|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-08-11 08:38 PM Original message |
Senate Panel Reportedly Probing S&P Downgrade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-08-11 08:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. I hope it will be quick and inexpensive! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tansy_Gold (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-08-11 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. They had nothing better to do??? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Firebrand Gary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-08-11 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
3. Is it true that S&P is affiliated with Murdoch? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rurallib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-08-11 08:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-08-11 08:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Read the discussion on the link below |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-08-11 08:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. There is a discussion regarding that on the link below |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fool Count (878 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-08-11 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
7. Those bozos got some balls. Why don't they investigate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KeyserSoze87 (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-08-11 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
8. Good for them! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-08-11 10:03 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KeyserSoze87 (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-08-11 10:34 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. I'd say just detain them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fuddnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-08-11 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
9. They should have been investigating them for 3 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngkorWot (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-08-11 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
12. Investigating them for what, exactly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC