Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cenk Uygur: "Can anyone name Obama’s principles? Something he will not bend on?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:11 AM
Original message
Cenk Uygur: "Can anyone name Obama’s principles? Something he will not bend on?"
Edited on Tue Aug-09-11 11:20 AM by Better Believe It
Obama’s Tipping Point
By: Cenk Uygur
August 9, 2011

Can anyone name Obama’s principles? Something he will not bend on? A progressive priority he will defend to the end?

Does Obama even think of himself as a progressive? He once pointed to a glass half-filled with water and told Sen. Bernie Sanders, “That’s the problem with you progressives. You see this as half-empty.” You progressives?

But does anyone think that the guy who hired Tim Geithner, Rahm Emanuel, Larry Summers, William Daley, Peter Orszag, Ben Bernanke, etc. is remotely progressive? If you looked throughout the whole country, could you find more conservative, establishment Democrats? Barely, if at all. And, of course, some of those guys aren’t even Democrats.

Now, the Obama supporters won’t believe this either. They’ll blame the messenger as usual. But go ahead, ignore this message at your peril. Apparently, the people at the White House think they’re such geniuses. “Did you know it turns out centrists decide elections?” This is the kind of politics you learn in third grade and they think they’re playing three dimensional chess. Yes, independents are important, but they hate weakness in their leaders. Giving the Republicans everything they want every single time doesn’t appeal to any independents and will lead to half of your own voters staying at home.

Read the full article at:

http://firedoglake.com/2011/08/09/obamas-tipping-point/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cenk and FDL...
a match made in heaven.

:rofl:

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Maybe
But what are Obama's standards...does he have any, or do they change with the shifting of the political winds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. No kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. They'll wind up endorsing Bachmann out of spite!
If you read Cenk's bio at wiki, you'll see he is such a great progressive that he worked for the opposing side half of the time.

Sort of like Ms. Hampster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Will Obama endorse Bachmann because he works for the opposition 3/4 of the time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. vaght? it's the ODS... two peas in a bitter pod...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
60. Yeah... And The Thin-Skin-Ness Of Obama, And His Sycophants Is...
really unsettling.

Prepare for battle, but make sure you moisturize first.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
67. yeah, hilarious-- especially coming from a die-hard OCTist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
72. Cenk rules. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
83. So you agree with the OP?
You don't seem to be arguing against it, so your post must indicate agreement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's just it -- *what*, if anything, is his "line in the sand?"
Edited on Tue Aug-09-11 11:15 AM by villager
Does he have one?

Because we have yet to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Obama's own words indicate he thinks lines in the sand are the problem.
"So it’s not a lack of plans or policies that’s the problem here. It’s a lack of political will in Washington. It’s the insistence on drawing lines in the sand" -- President Obama


If he thinks lines in the sand are the problem, it seems unlikely that he has any himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. He has clearly delineated lines in the sand when it comes to...
..progressive policies. He mocks them, scoffs at them, denigrates them, ignores them, and refuses to even consider them. I'd say that's a pretty blatant line. So - yes, he most certainly does have "lines in the sand" he draws. What's interesting is WHERE he puts them. And that is the problem - not the lines or no-lines -- it's where they ARE that is at issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
59. Excellent point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #15
94. Not so much where he's putting the line
but on which side of it he is standing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chervilant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
129. Furthermore,
many of us have no use for Obama's patronizing and/or condescending rebuttals to our concerns or criticisms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #129
131. I certainly don't. I don't appreciate his minions' condescending namecalling either
Edited on Wed Aug-10-11 11:32 AM by ProfessionalLeftist
thus, my DU name. ;)

It's really a f*ck YOU to the lot of them. I got a damn letter from the DNC asking for $$ to support Obama in 2012. Back it goes with a photo of a damn can of peas and a message that says: "SORRY, I'M BROKE, call Goldman Sachs. -Sincerely, Professional Leftist"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chervilant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
130. Furthermore,
many of us have no use for Obama's patronizing and/or condescending rebuttals to our concerns or criticisms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
137. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
45. ^ I take Obama at his word on that ^ n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
62. Obama has no core beliefs
whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
117. That's exactly right. That's his core principle.
The process is all-important and everyone needs to see that the other side is operating in good faith too.

That principle can't cope with the reality that they're not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, he will not bend on cutting SS, Medicare, funding for Public Ed.
Tax cuts for the wealthy, bailing out Wall Street, wars and no accountability for the Bush admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. Principles are soooooo 18th century.
“Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost." John Quincy Adams

"Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." Tom Paine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. don't lose your temper.
at least not on camera.

i'm pretty sure that one's etched in stone for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kudzu22 Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. Obama's one core principle seems to be
that Obama is awesome. Never seen him back off from that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. "Compromise is a tactic, it’s not a principle."
Compromise is a tactic, it’s not a principle. It doesn’t give you the right answer. It is sometimes necessary, but offers no guidance in what should be the final outcome.


:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bettie Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. I wish he had one thing he would not bend on
Just one thing would make me feel so much better about him.

I hate voting for the lesser of two evils and, unfortunately, I've come from supporting him and believing in him to thinking he's maybe not quite as bad a a teabagger candidate would be.

I'll vote for him, but it won't be with enthusiasm as it was last time, it will be with a feeling of resignation and loss.

The loss is of the potential for our country that has been wasted, we had a chance to implement an honestly progressive agenda and it was squandered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
41. I feel the exact same way you do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CherylK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
44. +1
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mochajava666 Donating Member (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
113. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
13. Bailouts for the rich, accountability for teachers, more war, and entitlement cuts.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
14. Obama is so ridged he is starting to look like Gumby. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
103. Make up your mind either he is ridged or he is startting to look like
Gumby can't have it both ways!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
16. Caving. He will absolutely not bend on caving.
He will cave on any and all issues , every time, without exception , regardless of past stated positions on the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
66. Obama will cave imo only if caving takes him to where he really wants to go, so
sell him short at your own peril. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libmom74 Donating Member (577 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #16
101. +100
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roxiejules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
17. Wall Street found him pleasing
from May 2008

"The Wall Street plan for the Obama-bubble presidency is that of the cleanup crew for the housing bubble: sweep all the corruption and losses, would-be indictments, perp walks and prosecutions under the rug and get on with an unprecedented taxpayer bailout of Wall Street. ... Who better to sell this agenda to the millions of duped mortgage holders and foreclosed homeowners in minority communities across America than our first, beloved, black president of hope and change?

Why do Wall Street and the corporate law firms think they will find a President Obama to be accommodating? As the Black Agenda Report notes, "Evidently, the giant insurance companies, the airlines, oil companies, Wall Street, military contractors and others had closely examined and vetted Barack Obama and found him pleasing."


- via Counterpunch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swilton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
19. Attacking
Republican candidates overtly

Democratic principles covertly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
20. His Number One Principle:
Always compromise - even before negotiations begin.

Think "Single Payer", "Public Option".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #20
125. Add Bush Tax Cuts, Debt Ceiling, Afganistan Occupation, Iraq Occupation
and closing Guantanamo Bay to that list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Second Stone Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
22. He will not bend on the principle that progressives
and liberals must be sacrificed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tranche Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
23. I don't see how this is surprising.
Edited on Tue Aug-09-11 11:55 AM by tranche
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
25. He holds the principles and goals of the Third Way,
and is working toward them very successfully.

Unfortunately, with the exception of a few social issues, they are the same principles and goals the Republicans hold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
26. The never ending wars....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
27. The one thing he won't bend on is letting some rapture ready Republican win the White House
As he should.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
28. Obviously he bends to those who put the most pressure. It's up to us to be relentless with what we
want. We may not have the billions of dollars but there are more of us then there are of them.

I'm sure if the pressure goes on for more than one day, the needle will begin to move. Until that happens, we only waste time and energy bickering with each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #28
74. +1 it's sooo true. October 6, Freedom Plaza, D.C. will be where...
that urgently needed pressure will be applied (hopefully).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
29. Careful. Some here think compromise, tax cuts for the rich, and debt deal are just fine. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creon Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
30. Cenk is a Republican
His complaints about Obama are an insult to hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. you win for most pointless troll post of the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #35
77. +1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #77
99. +2 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. Ah yes. That's why he votes Democratic? He strongly supported OBAMA too.

<snip>
On social issues, Uygur is now pro-choice on abortion, and supports LGBT rights, including same-sex marriage. In 2009, he advocated the liberalization of drug laws, arguing that the War on Drugs has been a failure, as shown by the continuing violence in Mexico and the border region. He also opposes imprisoning non-violent drug offenders for marijuana possession. He previously supported capital punishment in the United States, but now opposes it largely due to multiple exonerations of death row inmates since the reinstatement of the death penalty.

Uygur has expressed support for a return to Clinton-era income tax brackets and has criticized the 2010 Obama–GOP compromise which provided for a temporary extension of the Bush tax cuts. Uygur has stated that he favored welfare reform as enacted under Bill Clinton. He has been critical of excessive regulation, but has argued that in recent decades, regulation of the financial sector has been inadequate. In particular, he faults the deregulatory policies of Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush. He views the repeal of the Glass–Steagall Act (which Clinton signed into law}, as a major contributor to the late-2000s recession.

On national security and civil liberties issues, Uygur has strongly opposed the practices, begun under the Bush administration, of indefinite detention, warrantless wiretapping and extraordinary rendition, and believes that waterboarding is an illegal torture technique. Though Uygur has been a strong critic of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli government, he has stated that he is an advocate for a two state solution in the West Bank and has repeatedly criticized the Israeli government for its failure to materialize. <17>
On Democratic politicians and officeholders

The 2000 election was the first time Uygur voted Democratic, supporting Al Gore. Uygur has supported Democratic congressional and presidential candidates ever since, though he frequently criticized the Democratic congressional leadership for insufficiently opposing the Bush administration on civil liberties and foreign policy issues. Uygur has criticized Blue Dog Democrats and other centrist and conservative Democrats, some of whom he has labeled as "corporatists". However, he has described former Wisconsin Senator Russ Feingold, a Democrat, as "probably the only guy in the whole entire Senate we can trust".<18> When Feingold was defeated for reelection in 2010 by Republican Ron Johnson, Uygur said Feingold had been "the best Senator we had, and we no longer have him".<16> He has also effusively praised former Florida Congressman Alan Grayson.<16>

In part because of concerns over Bush's foreign policy and policies on civil liberties, Uygur said he would support an impeachment of Bush. Early in the 2008 Obama campaign, Uygur questioned Obama's suitability for the presidency, claiming the Obama lacked political experience at the national level and had limited achievements in the U.S. Senate. Nevertheless, he moved to a position of strong support later in the campaign.

Since the fall of 2009, Uygur has taken an increasingly critical attitude towards the Obama administration, saying after two years in office, Obama is, "not a progressive .... He is a consummate politician."<19> Uygur has criticized the 2010 health insurance reform law as overly watered-down, owing to excessive concessions to business and conservatives in Congress, noting the deal made between Obama and the drug companies. Uygur has similarly criticized the 2010 financial reform law.

Uygur feels the Obama administration has too readily conceded to conservative ideological arguments to the point of demonstrating an unwillingness to defend liberal positions. Despite this, Uygur has stated that he intends to vote for Obama's reelection in the 2012, and has asked rhetorically, "What am I going to do, vote for a lunatic?"<snip>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cenk_Uygur
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #30
43. What is your basis for that claim?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #30
47. CENK WAS A Republican... He No Longer Is!! Google Him... Then Read It! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #47
55. Sounds like an "infiltrator" to me.
I'm pretty sure his former producer is now connected with the "Third Way".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
certainot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #47
80. anyone the last 30 years who was a republican has some serious personality issues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #80
140. I'll take that in a heartbeat over someone who *currently* pushes GOP policies
while calling himself a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
certainot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #140
141. GOP policies?
he has to try to win some GOP support and could if it wasn't for limbaugh and sons being so potent, because they are ignored by the left, soem republicans would be able to compromise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #30
51. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. No Really, I LOVE Cenk... But I Did Google Him & It Does Say He WAS A Repuke...
Check it out. I'm with Cenk ALL THE WAY! Just thought I would relate what I read. I was shocked when I read it, but after reading ALL of it, it was great.

YAAAAAAAAA Cenk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #30
52. Attack the messenger-you lose. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #52
78. + 1 !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #52
84. Notice that they don't even try to discuss the message.
This is because principle has nothing to do with their loyalties. It is based completely on personality. If Obama ends the war. That is the right thing to do. If Obama expands the war. That is the right thing to do.

So they believe everything boils down to who said or did something. What they do or say doesn't matter to them. That is why they never discuss the message, the issue, the principle involved. If Obama or one his praisers says it, it is right. If someone who disagrees with Obama says it, it is wrong.

Life is very simple for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsPithy Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
89. Cenk admits he was a Republican. Which is way better than Obama
who is a Republican NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_ed_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #30
115. I guess irrelevant information like this is much
easier than dealing with the argument he put forth. Why not just make an insult about his weight, too? It's much easier than thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #30
116. Your statement is a blatant lie! Admit it! He's voted Dem. since 2000
Like most well-educated, intelligent people, his political views have changed to reflect the changing political realities.

Wikipedia:
He earned a B.S. in management from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, and a J.D. from Columbia Law School.

"The 2000 election was the first time Uygur voted Democratic, supporting Al Gore. Uygur has supported Democratic congressional and presidential candidates ever since, though he frequently criticized the Democratic congressional leadership for insufficiently opposing the Bush administration on civil liberties and foreign policy issues. Uygur has criticized Blue Dog Democrats and other centrist and conservative Democrats, some of whom he has labeled as "corporatists". However, he has described former Wisconsin Senator Russ Feingold, a Democrat, as "probably the only guy in the whole entire Senate we can trust". When Feingold was defeated for reelection in 2010 by Republican Ron Johnson, Uygur said Feingold had been "the best Senator we had, and we no longer have him". He has also effusively praised former Florida Congressman Alan Grayson."

On social issues, Uygur is now pro-choice on abortion, and supports LGBT rights, including same-sex marriage. In 2009, he advocated the liberalization of drug laws, arguing that the War on Drugs has been a failure, as shown by the continuing violence in Mexico and the border region. He also opposes imprisoning non-violent drug offenders for marijuana possession. He previously supported capital punishment in the United States, but now opposes it largely due to multiple exonerations of death row inmates since the reinstatement of the death penalty.

Uygur has expressed support for a return to Clinton-era income tax brackets and has criticized the 2010 Obama–GOP compromise which provided for a temporary extension of the Bush tax cuts. Uygur has stated that he favored welfare reform as enacted under Bill Clinton. He has been critical of excessive regulation, but has argued that in recent decades, regulation of the financial sector has been inadequate. In particular, he faults the deregulatory policies of Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton, and George W. Bush. He views the repeal of the Glass–Steagall Act (which Clinton signed into law}, as a major contributor to the late-2000s recession.

On national security and civil liberties issues, Uygur has strongly opposed the practices, begun under the Bush administration, of indefinite detention, warrantless wiretapping and extraordinary rendition, and believes that waterboarding is an illegal torture technique. Though Uygur has been a strong critic of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli government, he has stated that he is an advocate for a two state solution in the West Bank and has repeatedly criticized the Israeli government for its failure to materialize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
31. Getting elected
For that, he'll stand fast and do just about anything. Just ask Hillary about South Carolina if this is unclear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Bingo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. I don't care if he has to promise to pass out hundred dollar bills and free turkeys to win
Edited on Tue Aug-09-11 01:27 PM by NNN0LHI
Anything is worth keeping another rapture ready Republican out of the White House.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #38
88. Yes, that's true, but don't you feel even the least bit offended?
As one of the few remaining VERY early DUers, you've seen all of the interplay.

Don't you feel the least bit hijacked and abused by this administration? That's not meant as anywhere near an accusation; I'm just surprised that we have to fight so hard to sustain someone who continues Bill Clinton's idiotic quest to forge right for personal love from the unswerving reactionaries.

The horrifying net result of Obama's course is that it drags the reasonable non-right ever rightward as the right just goes for the gusto. Those who reveled in the new thrust of this administration are deeply disheartened because it is not transcendent politicking, it's the most mundane and toxic of the same old crap: soft-soaping and appeasement to duck anything difficult and curry favor. This administration, trumpeted as "new politics" reeks to the very marrow of the lamest and unthinking ward-heeling bullshit of old.

I don't want more people to turn away in rightful cynicism from our politics; that bolsters two very dangerous things: lack of turnout among the non-reactionaries and a general scofflaw feeling of disenfranchisement.

I'll probably buy a turkey, I'll vote and I'll try to sway the swayable, but this administration--and by that I mean our President--are Quislings to the spirit of pluralism. I mean that to their faces and to their eyes; it is pathetic.

Thanks for still being there, and press on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #88
111. Well said n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #38
96. And you are certain he is not? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
32. Corporatism and "free trade"
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
34. That is the GREAT thing about "Centrism"!
Edited on Tue Aug-09-11 12:49 PM by bvar22
Centrism.....because it is so EASY!
You don't have to STAND for ANYTHING,
and get to insult those who DO!
:party:




-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
36. "It turns out that centrists decide elections"...
...sounds familiar. Oh yeah: "It turns out, by the way, that oil rigs today generally don’t cause spills."

I give both statements equal credence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsPithy Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #36
90. "It turns out that centrists decide elections," only works if you have solidified your base.
And, you don't solidify your base by constantly "punching" them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #90
97. Yep. Wishy-washy no-committment centrists are drawn toward the side
that they think will win. You win with a strong base, which attracts the centrists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
37. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
20score Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
40. Short answer, no.
Edited on Tue Aug-09-11 02:00 PM by 20score
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
42. Free trade.
He's not going to back down on that one. He'll get more free trade if he has to sacrifice every last safety net to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
46. HUGE K & R !!!
Yep...

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
48. k & r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
49. Compromise!
or else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erodriguez Donating Member (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
50. Race to the top and privatizing the public school system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. and keeping Bush tax cuts for the rich in place. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
54. Giving the rich what they want, he never bends on that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
57. He will not bend on bendability!
You can depend on that bendability!

Take that Princess Bendy-Straws!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
58. easy
the all elusive BI-PARTISANSHIP bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
61. Who knows what he believs or doesn't believe at this point...it's muddy.
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
63. Free trade agreements are good and must stand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
64. He's a strong, powerful yielder. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firebrand Gary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
65. Vote for Pedro!
Why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #65
126. I'm with you. What could it hurt?







"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans.
I want a party that will STAND UP for Working Americans."
---Paul Wellstone


photo by bvar22
Shortly before Sen Wellstone was killed



"By their WORKS you will know them."



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayrow Donating Member (230 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
68. Obama's principal seems to be attempting to accomplish "peace in our time"....
with teabaggers, republicans, Bush junta criminal operatives, and anyone else that would want to see his type lynched for seeming uppity. And a demand for unconditional surrender for those that would assist him, supported him, and elected him president in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim_Shorts Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
69. Cmon ,there ARE things that Obama will absolutely not bend on ever

* Bo can only sit on the old furniture... "shit , is this furniture old or new? ah, never mind"

* Bo can not sleep on the bed... "well, as long as he doesn't put his head on the pillow"

* If someone important is in the house, Bo has to stay outside... "is that guy important? well just this once"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny Noshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #69
106. Interesting picture
The dog is walking him. Tells it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
70. Obama will cave at every opportunity.
Just read who Reid picked for the "super congress." So, how does this work. 4-2 or 5-1 ... Rupublicons get their way again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
71. The only principle that I'm certain he possesses.....
...is the idea that he should be President.

- Not everyone agrees......

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
man4allcats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
73. Everytime I log in here, I realize anew that there's NOTHING he won't cave on.
For those interested in what this country is about vs. what it was supposed to be about, read Howard Zinn's A People's History Of The United States, also available at Amazon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
75. Capitulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
76. Yes, making sure mega-corporations don't suffer at the expense
of the citizenry. That was obvious after the oil spill in the Gulf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
certainot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
79. i'm surprised he got this much done without mass protests and considering how fairweathery his 'back
ers' turned out to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
81. REC. This is just a continuation of voting "Present". I regret the day I voted for the man. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
82. He places a high value on his comfortable shoes. and as soon
as he finds them....look out....shit is going to happen...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvNewcastle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
85. Obama has some twisted principles.
He's like a whore who has unprotected sex and then, as a good deed, goes and donates at the blood bank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
86. he seems pretty unwavering on the whole killing people in afghanistan and pakistan..
stalwart and resolute even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
87. No wonder Washington didn't like what they hear from Cenk
He tells em like it is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LatteLibertine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
91. Look closely at our
coming "trade" deal with Panama. It's good stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dash_bannon Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
92. On Centrism
If the president continues to cling to his centrist policy, it'll cost him the White House in 2012, and We the People the last strands of our democratic and free lives.

It's just stunning how we on the Left put Obama in the White House and he continues to kiss up to Tea Baggers.

I'm really not filled with optimism lately. Hopefully the Dems take back the state senate in Wisconsin.

It'd be nice to see us on the Left actually stand up and fight back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsPithy Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
93. Obama is positively rigid when it comes to
supply side economics. Yippee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
95. he does as he is told, like every other pResident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfpcjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
98. I think you get in that office and are introduced to the U.S. Shadow Government...
the first week. Then they show you the Fox "private detective" copies of your voice mail and email for the past decade. Even Cenk doesn't know what that is like. I personally would not have appointed the Goldman-Government dudes like Larry Sommers and the phony Geithner to oversee the recovery, but apparently Obama felt he had to have Goldman close. No one can guarantee what it would be like as a captive in the prison Whitehouse, even me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
100. k&r

amused and (almost) intrigued by the absolutely ridiculous bashing directed at FDL, of all places! some pretty illustrative stuff there. :)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
102. Percentage to tip?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
104. Okay I think we all understand "progressives" want
to get back to the safe norm of a Republican President!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
105. I no longer feel the need to participate
in these threads. The reason being is that I know with certainty that Obama is not on my side. I will vote for someone else.

I participate because it makes me feel a little better. But I must confess, I feel that those continuing their support of Obama are downright foolish.

It is if he wants you to know that he isn't on your side. He's convinced me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #105
132. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
107. Yawn...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
108. He admires what Reagan did

Probably won't bend on that.


---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seeker4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
109. Obama is dedicated to caving in and being indignant if called out for it.
Much like the push right, lesser evil defenders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
110. I can only hope that instead of causing half of the base to
stay home, it causes most of the base field a candidate. Bernie, Matt Damon..,I don't care as long as they are a real Progressive Democrat.

Then if all the votes really do count (where's that damned tooth fairy?) we might end up with a leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a2liberal Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
112. K&R (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
114. Yes . . . Obama will not bend on . . . COMPROMISE. He must do it always. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dad Infinitum Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #114
122. The process is more important to Obama than the end result
That is why we are so screwed. Obama is sharing his presidency with the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capitalocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #114
134. Caving in on 95 to 100% of the terms is an interesting definition of "compromise"
Some might call it giving away the store.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #134
138. Heh . . . I agree totally. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
118. Republicans get to pick the movie, the restaurant - and later, in bed, they get to come first.
Democrats must pay for the theater tickets and dinner, and have to provide for their own satisfaction manually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #118
135. LOL! That brought back memories of my first marriage!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #135
136. Now that was funny!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timefortherevolution Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
119. We Clinton supporters tried to warn you! He always voted PRESENT
on all the tough issues while in Congress.

Very telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capitalocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #119
120. I've heard a lot of people say Clinton would've been better
but I have my doubts. I guess it's hard to imagine she'd be worse, but she's a very establishment politician. She's looked very bad in my eyes ever since the Honduras coup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dad Infinitum Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #120
121. She is a fighter
Doubtful she would have been a right winger on everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #121
142. Well, that's the one thing about Hillary.
Eric would not have called her bluff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #120
133. I have to agree. Her husband played a major role in Wall Street de-regulation and I've never seen

and indication that she has been opposed to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #119
123. One "No" vote on Iraq War authorization and Mrs. Clinton would be President right now
Even some contrition on her go-with-the-flow vote may have helped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #123
124. I agree,
and I hope that she regrets that vote every single day,
along with all the other "Democrats" who placed Political Convenience above Principle.



"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans.
I want a party that will STAND UP for Working Americans."
---Paul Wellstone


photo by bvar22
Shortly before Sen Wellstone was killed



"By their WORKS you will know them."



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #119
127. Yes, you did!
In the end, I think Hillary is more of a straight shooter than obama.

I'd vote for her in the 2012 primary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
128. Staying the course in Afghanistan?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hifiguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
139. I can think of one, but it ain't progressive.
He certainly believes in comforting the comfortable and afflicting the afflicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC