Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One Wisconsin Republican state senator has been voting with Democrats on labor issues.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 08:25 AM
Original message
One Wisconsin Republican state senator has been voting with Democrats on labor issues.
John Nichols of The Nation says that even though Republicans have 17 state senators and Democrats now have 16, there is one of the Republicans who has consistently been bucking his party on some of the issues, particularly those regarding labor.


His name is Dale Schultz.

In effect, he is the swing vote, as he has been voting with the Democrats, notably during the collective bargaining battle.


So he may be the Lincoln Chafee 'of Wisconsin'. (The GOP is still smarting over that.)



Here is an example of Schultz working with his Democratic colleagues.



Maddow: If Republicans Retain Power in WI Senate, All Eyes Will Turn to Dale Schultz

August 10, 2011

From Crooks and LIars:


....

The final results of the Wisconsin recall elections came in after Rachel Maddow made this report and just afterward, the AP did declare the race in Wisconsin Senate District 8 for Alberta Darling. After taking the viewers through a wrap up of the other final results of the elections during some of MSNBC's extended coverage Tuesday night, Maddow discussed what this is going to mean for the balance of power in the Wisconsin Senate and how all eyes might now be turning to state Sen. Dale Schultz in that regard since he has shown a willingness to work with some of his Democratic colleagues and push back against Gov. Scott Walkers radical anti-union agenda.

..... (video at link)



All is definitely not lost.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
N7Shepard Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Correct, 16-17 or 17-16 changes little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC