Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

St. Louis Post-Dispatch Editorial: If U.S. is serious about debt, there's a single-payer solution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:52 AM
Original message
St. Louis Post-Dispatch Editorial: If U.S. is serious about debt, there's a single-payer solution


Editorial: If U.S. is serious about debt, there's a single-payer solution.
By the Editorial Board
STLtoday.com
August 10, 2011

If America truly is serious about dealing with its deficit problems, there's a fairly simple solution. But you're probably not going to like it: Enact a single-payer health care plan.

.... there are two broad ways for the government to address its spiraling health care costs. One, shift more of those costs to recipients, by trimming benefits and/or extending eligibility ages and indexing eligibility to personal income. This is politically unpalatable, particularly to most Democrats, President Barack Obama being a conspicuous exception.

The second way for government to address its health costs is not to shift them, but to reduce them. This is what a single-payer health care system would do, largely by taking the for-profit players (insurance companies for the most part) out of the loop.

Once everyone is covered, the government would have the clout to bring discipline into the wild west of health care spending. It could insist that providers be paid for quality of service, not quantity. Health facilities and equipment could be managed by regional boards. Medical services could be "bundled" — rather than paying hospitals and doctors and laboratories separately, there would be fixed prices for treatments. And so on.

Please read the full editorial at:

http://www.stltoday.com/news/opinion/editorial/article_97afa329-42f8-5f12-adb0-97fa305c3e4b.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Great article...
Clear and to the point. That should be forwarded to a lot of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It was written by their editorial board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Finally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. good article....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-11 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wait a tick, what's that about shifting costs to recipients, trimming benefits and the rest?
By JOVE, what a stroke! After all, nobody wants that socialistic health care, what with the longer life spans, lower infant mortality rates, better access to preventive care and such. Death panels!!!

The really dirty little secret behind single payer is that there will indeed be insurers and health care providers eager to provide premium care to the well-heeled. Don't want to wait your turn for an exam? Just pay something extra to a doctor outside the system, and jump to the head of any line! It's always been that way, and for those willing to pay, always will be. The good news is that people currently waiting until something catastrophic happens will get in far sooner to be seen, and head off any number of very expensive illnesses. Early diagnosis and treatment will result in huge savings on health care, as people will no longer wait to be seen because they can't afford a diagnosis.

This is such a no-brainer, it's a wonder that the people with no brains are carrying this debate. I think the terms of the discussion could be changed very quickly with a fierce advocate in a key position of the government. But who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC