been hyped by the media into a big scare story about hordes of black youth randomly attacking people for fun. 5 black kids were arrested & convicted based on confessions & nothing else.
later turned out:
Although the suspects (except Salaam) had confessed on videotape in the presence of a parent or guardian, they retracted their statements within weeks, claiming that they had been intimidated, lied to, and coerced into making false confessions.<9> The detectives had indeed used ruses to convince the suspects to confess, with Salaam confessing to having been present only after he was told that fingerprints were found on the victim's clothing.<10> While the confessions themselves were videotaped, the hours of interrogation that preceded the confessions were not.
No DNA evidence tied the suspects to the crime, so the prosecution's case rested almost entirely on the confessions.<1> In fact, analysis indicated that the DNA collected at the crime scene did not match any of the suspects — and that the crime scene DNA had all come from a single, as yet unknown person.<9>
In 2002, another man's confession, plus DNA evidence confirming his crime, led the district attorney's office to recommend vacating the convictions of the teenagers originally accused and sentenced to prison. In 2002, convicted rapist and murderer Matias Reyes, serving a life sentence for other crimes but not, at that point, associated by the police with the attack on Meili, declared that he had committed the assault when he was 17, and that he had acted alone. The DNA evidence confirmed his participation in the crime and identified him as the sole contributor of the semen found in and on the victim "to a factor of one in 6,000,000,000 people".<11> Supporters of the five defendants again claimed their confessions had been coerced. An examination of the inconsistencies between their confessions led the prosecutor to question the veracity of the confessions. District Attorney Robert M. Morgenthau's office wrote:
"A comparison of the statements reveals troubling discrepancies. ... The accounts given by the five defendants differed from one another on the specific details of virtually every major aspect of the crime... In many other respects the defendants' statements were not corroborated by, consistent with, or explanatory of objective, independent evidence. And some of what they said was simply contrary to established fact."<11>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Park_Jogger_caseI remember very well how that case was hyped, how all the usual pundits came out to decry the breakdown of society, the breakdown of the black family, blah blah -- while the media published crazed reports about this new (& entirely imaginary) phenomenon of "wilding".
after the initial hype around the case died down when the black kids were charged, i never heard anything more of "wilding" or of hordes of black kids running around randomly attacking people, even though the media told me it was a "trend" of "disaffected black youth" who were "monsters"!!!!!!!happening everywhere!!!!!!
it was 99% bullshit. and i am willing to bet that this will be as well.
the media get the facts wrong. they exaggerate. they spin based on politics. they lie. and they do psyops. i have personally experienced a major case of this and have never taken any of these kinds of stories without a dose of salts since.