Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ariz. sues feds over Voting Rights Act : claims law is unconstitutional

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 11:36 AM
Original message
Ariz. sues feds over Voting Rights Act : claims law is unconstitutional
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44280196/ns/politics-more_politics/

Opening up a new front in its legal battles with the Obama administration, the state of Arizona on Thursday challenged the federal Voting Rights Act, prompting a swift response from Attorney General Eric Holder.

"The Voting Rights Act plays a vital role in our society by ensuring that every American has the right to vote and to have that vote counted. The Department of Justice will vigorously defend the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act in this case, as it has done successfully in the past," Holder said.

The state's lawsuit claims the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional, Horne said, "because it suspects all changes to state election law, however innocuous, until pre-clearance is given by the federal government."

The state objects to seeking federal approval to dissolve school districts that have no students and annex them to adjoining districts. "A statute as innocuous as this has to go through an approval process with the Justice Department. Such laws cannot be justified by any power delegated to the federal government by the Constitution," says the state's lawsuit, filed Thursday in federal court in Washington, DC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Voting Rights Act? Really?
These people have lost their collective minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hifiguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Of course, it is perfectly constitutional
as was held by the SCOTUS back in the 1960s.

Given the Koch four and Anthony Kennedy, it may be up for grabs now. Though I can not see Kennedy voting to overturn it. The other four would in a heartbeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC