Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For those of you who think Perry can't win

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 11:40 PM
Original message
For those of you who think Perry can't win
Look back at the 2008 election results.

On the night of the election I was ecstatic, the next morning it hit me. After the worst President in our lifetime about 1.5 million American voters jumped off the Republican bandwagon. Slightly over 1% of the voting public. The landslide was based upon new voters.

So after an Administration lied us into a major war, deregulated us to the point of economic meltdown, just over 1% abandoned the party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is something I had not considered.
We need to do that again, to ensure Perry doesn't take it.

And he is dangerous...

Recommended.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Living in CA I have days when I think, what the hell, let it happen
With the thought that the whole thing blows up and a least some of us can move on and make a better life for our children. To hell with Arizona, (my birth state) Utah, Texas, Oklahoma, the Dakotas, the entire South, Wyoming, Idaho, Indiana, let them fend for themselves while we on the Coasts move on. Then my non-"Christian" mentality takes over and I realize that I have met great people from all of these states. And ignorance of the overall population of these states does not exempt good people of these states from the efforts all of those who sacrificed to make this Country great.

For clarification, be calling myself a non-"Christian" is in no way of slam on Christians, some of the best people I have met are liberal Christians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. And some of those who jumped off, have now returned to GOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Without a doubt
My point is about 59 million people will vote for this asshole. They are ignorant, but if 8 years of Bush didn't shake their faith, or motivate them to stay at home, then we shouldn't expect anything lower than that number in '12.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is that one percent of the total voting public
or one percent of people who actually voted? That's kind of an important detail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Percent of the people who actually voted



2008
69,456,897 to 59,934,814. 129,391,711 Total

2004
62,040,610 to 59,028,439. 121,069,049 Total

Rebublican drop

62,040,610 - 59,934,814 = 2,105,796

As percent of 2004 vote 1.7%

As percent of 2008 vote 1.6%

Yes I overstated by 1/2 percent, still the numbers are friggen scary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think the Scary Republican is Huntsman.
He smiles real nice, sounds sane, calls himself "center - right" and rides a motorcycle. Looks normal, too.

Yes, he's Mormon, but he's not desperado Mittsy, with his "Love me!! LOVE ME!!! Corporations are PEEE-PULL, my FRIEND," schtick.

That guy is smooth. Not needy. Measured in his responses. Watching his words carefully, playing to his audience. A bit of a Tabula Rasa, as well. I can see people saying "Oh, he doesn't MEAN that," or "He's just saying that to get elected," or "I interpreted that to mean (insert something completely opposite to his actual intent)."

When all the First Tier Clowns beat each other to death and oppo the hell outta each other, he may be the last fool standing who can cobble together enough delegates to grab the thing.

Plus, he spells his name "Jon"--which means he's "youthful."

He makes me nervous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firebrand Gary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It freaks me out hearing you say this, clearly you are seeing what I am seeing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. Yep, he's got that "Manly yes, but oy like him too!" Irish Spring freshness all over himself!
People who go for the superficial will like him. People who want him to represent their POV will like him. People who like motorcycles will like him. People who like Mormons will like him. People who hate Mormons will say "Well, he's not a creepy Mormon" and they'll deal with his religion that way. People who think only white men who look Ken-Doll-ish should be President will like him. People who think Romney has foot-in-mouth will like him. Stupid women who like his looks will like him.

He comes across with a particular, essential POV (the whole center-right thing) but beyond that, he's a blank slate upon which one can write their hopes and dreams....and they can "believe." And he's not stupid--he knows how to say a lot of nice sounding buzzwords, yet still not say much of anything. Way smoother than Porgie was in that regard.

I look at him and I hear my wallet groaning. I thought I'd be able to go easy this election on the whole campaign contribution/check writing thing with an incumbent in the WH, but maybe not.

I hope one of the Batshit Crazies gets the nom, that's easy to beat. But Huntsman? He could be trouble with the right team behind him.

I suppose we can always pray for a deal-crushing scandal!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I think you are being logical
And that is a huge mistake when analyzing republicans.

Huntsman is somewhat logical, therefore has no chance of winning the primary. These new bred of Repubs are illogical, ignorant, and will take the County down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. One could say they are the in-bred
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Warren G. Harding wasn't supposed to get the nomination, either.
The frontrunners clawed each other to death, and he was the sweetheart of the second stringers--even with an illegitimate baby and a girlfriend in the wings. His biggest assets were he was both corrupt and malleable.

If none of the frontrunning leaders have enough clout to bring it home, they might cut a deal with Huntsman, or the state delegates could be teased away by a behind-the-scenes kingmaker. You never know. A power broker, who sees a fresh face named JON, a Tabula Rasa upon which anything can be written, could twist arms and make things happen. These sorts of things do happen at conventions where there's a lot of ... kerfluffle.

The Old Guard of the GOP don't appeal to the young kids and middle aged paunchy types who think they are still young; but a guy who rides a motorbike? He's got sizzle.

I will remain wary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. We also need to remember that few thought Bush could win at this point in time in 1999.
Edited on Mon Aug-29-11 11:57 PM by HuckleB
... Well, OK. He didn't actually win, but he was close enough for it to be able to be faked, or whatever.

Nonetheless...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
12. 2012 and all the bugs have been worked out.
Electronic manipulation should be our biggest worry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. I definitely think he can win
Edited on Tue Aug-30-11 12:39 AM by steve2470
I think it's important to remember that the vast majority of the electorate is not as well informed as we are.
DU (and sites similar to it) are an oasis in RW propagandized media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CelticThunder Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
14. If he wins - it will be because Obama has wasted so many opportunities to show leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
15. After 2000, I realized any right wing chowderhead can win.
All it takes is a tight race and enough vote fraud in the right places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC