|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Liberal_in_LA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 12:06 PM Original message |
Apartrment complex evicts several residents for not calling 911 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
1. The police can't give personal protection to everybody. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bunny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 12:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Because shootouts with drug dealers when there are children nearby |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 12:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Especially in a state that will execute you based on recanted heresay... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy Vixen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 12:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 09:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
28. So letting drug dealers shoot at them while unarmed is better? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 12:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Boy, howdy - residents of the poor sections of town armed with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 12:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. That data specifically covers a city that has banned handguns. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 12:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. But it does illustrate the effect of widespread gun use. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 12:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. By outlaws who have a virtual monopoly on gun possession. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 09:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
29. Even the best police protection isn't enough to guarantee... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 12:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Sure, a full fledged shootout will be best |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 10:06 PM Response to Reply #6 |
35. Being defenseless against crime is better? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 10:26 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. I'd like to live in that fantasy world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-24-11 08:37 AM Response to Reply #38 |
47. So you do hold that being defenseless against thugs to be better. N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 12:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. If all people should be armed, why should they be concealed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 09:44 PM Response to Reply #9 |
30. The genuine Old West had a much lower crime rate than today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 10:27 PM Response to Reply #30 |
39. And a much lower gun ownership too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-24-11 08:31 AM Response to Reply #39 |
45. Bellesiles was proven to be a liar. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 12:27 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. a gun in the hands of a witness to criminal activity would have helped how, exactly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 09:58 PM Response to Reply #12 |
32. You have a very active imagination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-24-11 01:16 AM Response to Reply #32 |
43. i never said being defenseless and helpless is a good thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-24-11 08:35 AM Response to Reply #43 |
46. If you are against gun ownership, which you are, then the only alternative... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-24-11 09:34 AM Response to Reply #46 |
50. what makes you think i'm against gun ownership? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abelenkpe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 01:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
17. crazy. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 10:00 PM Response to Reply #17 |
33. Why is being able to defend oneself crazy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 01:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. they should walk around with guns out and pointed at all times and warn people to keep away lol nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 10:01 PM Response to Reply #20 |
34. That is called brandishing and is a felony. N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 01:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
23. They'd better check their leases to see if they're permitted to own firearms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 10:08 PM Response to Reply #23 |
36. Such clauses are probably unconstitutional. N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 10:22 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Such clauses are fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-24-11 08:42 AM Response to Reply #37 |
49. Maybe. I'm not a lawyer. It would be an interesting court case. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabblevox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
11. I pray the women have a good lawyer, they should make bank on this. /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demoiselle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 12:42 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. I do too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
13. I don't get it--is that in their lease, that they are "required" to call 911 if they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rabblevox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 12:49 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. There has been a ton of case law on this, and the apt. owners are toast... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 01:03 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I have no personal understanding either--all I can say, though, is, that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 01:24 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. In my case, it's in the lease... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 01:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. If you don't mind me asking, how was that worded in the lease? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 04:00 PM Response to Reply #22 |
27. And how could it be proven in the court, however worded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 09:57 PM Response to Reply #19 |
31. That can't be legal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-24-11 12:54 AM Response to Reply #19 |
41. I am flummoxed--how can a landlord make you work for them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-24-11 10:00 AM Response to Reply #13 |
51. yeah i dont get it either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
18. If the landlord feels that strongly about it, why doesn't he set up his own |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
21. Pass the popcorn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Synicus Maximus (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
24. This is just wrong and it is a HUD property. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 03:55 PM Response to Original message |
25. Is that in the lease? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WinkyDink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
26. That landlord is going to pay big-time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-23-11 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
40. Not enough info contained in the WSB TV report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-24-11 12:57 AM Response to Reply #40 |
42. You might be right. The only thing I can suspect, if this is allowed to happen, is that some of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-24-11 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
44. I can solve the problem: FREE RENT TO ANY OFFICER WILLING TO LIVE IN APT. COMPLEX. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenStormCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-24-11 08:40 AM Response to Reply #44 |
48. That amounts to a tax on the apartment complex owners. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-24-11 11:07 AM Response to Reply #48 |
53. Well, if I were an apartment complex owner, I wouldn't mind two or three officers living inside. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipi_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-24-11 11:49 AM Response to Reply #44 |
54. One would think so, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipi_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-24-11 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
52. Something doesn't smell right about this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-24-11 12:42 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. I am wondering if some of the illegal activity happened WITHIN THE WALLS of the evicted tenants' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pipi_k (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-24-11 09:01 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. Yep, that's about the only thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-24-11 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
56. Liberal in LA, this story is FAKE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AverageJoe90 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-25-11 02:49 AM Response to Original message |
58. Is Atlanta run by Rethugs now? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 04:10 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC