yoyossarian
(821 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:14 PM
Original message |
Fuck YOU, Andrew Brietbart! |
|
Veteran Wes Clark GOES OFF on lil'Andy... no mercy, no quarter. LOVE IT! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41jcsTh60MM&feature=player_embedded
|
tblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:16 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I worked on his dad's campaign and adore them both.
|
Blue Owl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Andrew "Not Too Bright" Bart |
|
Smack that chickenhawk DOWN baby.
|
mod mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I would love to see that "doughy white male" get his due. |
Scuba
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Andrew Brietbart syphilis sheep santorum |
Whisp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:24 PM
Response to Original message |
|
fuck you, Andrew Briebart!!!!!
|
one_voice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I don't even need to watch the video... |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-11-11 12:46 PM by one_voice
(though I did)--to agree with "FUCK YOU Brietbart" aka doughyman.
KnR
edited cuz I spell like a freeper...LOL
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
7. What's With the Bleeps? |
|
They don't even cover up the word. So, why have them? It's just stupid.
BTW: I did love Clark's sentiment. That's why i wish they would just let him say what he wanted to say without the annoying bleeps that don't work anyway.
|
yoyossarian
(821 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Some of 'em are dropped in just a lil' too early or a lil' too late! |
|
It reminds me of somethin' Mel Brooks mighta done, just for atmosphere or somethin'... LOVE it!
:rofl:
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. They're Also Not At A High Enough Volume To Block The Words |
|
He's talking louder than the beeps! It's really stupid, ain't it? GAC
|
jayfish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. If not for the bleeps the content might be tagged as... |
|
"inappropriate for some users" requiring age verification and a log-in to be seen.
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
But, still. . .
If you can hear every word he said, the bleeps are fake. So, the warning would be fake.
What's the difference?
Really, i'm just being obstinate. I get your point. But, it's still silly. GAC
|
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:38 PM
Response to Original message |
8. It's really ashame that the name "Doughy Pantload" is already taken. |
|
I guess for Andy, plain old "Pantload" will do.
|
kayakjohnny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:45 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Loved the half-assed bleeps. Why did they even bother? |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 10:59 PM
Response to Original message |