Scuba
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:18 PM
Original message |
My OP on capitalism got 111 replies and zero net recs. |
|
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=2092224&mesg_id=2092224Proving the rec/unrec feature leaves something to be desired. Interesting thread but lack of support for the premise. I wonder how many really interesting threads remain invisible due to this problem? Is there a way to search for threads with lots of replies?
|
KurtNYC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message |
meegbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:21 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Are people required to rec your threads if they reply to it? |
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:24 PM
Response to Original message |
Scuba
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Yes! Now if I can just figure out how you got there! |
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. Greatest (see star icon above)..then top tens. |
Scuba
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
14. Thank you. The vast universe of my ignorance is now slightly smaller. |
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. You were relatively close to being net recommended. |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-11-11 12:38 PM by dkf
I guess DU is as split on capitalism as the country is split on everything else.
Oops you were net rec'd!
|
TBF
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
11. Click on the "top tens" icon on the greatest page - |
|
Looks like this: Top Tens »
|
Scuba
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
15. Thank you. The vast universe of my ignorance is now slightly smaller. |
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:24 PM
Response to Original message |
4. The unRec feature works fine. The majority disagreed with your premise n/t |
Pisces
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. The majority disagree with most of Scuba's posts. |
Scuba
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
19. 52/48. Small majority for this one. |
Scuba
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. I didn't suggest otherwise! |
leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Your OP was still very visible |
|
Not sure what you're really complaining about
:shrug:
|
Scuba
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:31 PM
Original message |
It was not a complaint, but an observation. |
Scuba
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. It was not a complaint, but an observation. |
LynneSin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message |
13. So you're saying people can't disagree with you? |
|
Only problem is is for is you. YOu had 111 replies which means alot of people read your thread and yet you complain.
:eyes:
|
Scuba
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
16. Not a complaint, just an observation. Thanks to posting this, I now know... |
|
...a completely different way to sort posts that I didn't know before.
|
LynneSin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
22. If it means anything people disagree with me all the time |
|
I'd rather have 111 posts with 0 recommendations then 2 replies with a few recommendations.
|
uppityperson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
18. unrec for post on rec/unrec feature. Look down "replies" column to see # replies, and you can |
|
sort that way also. Unrec this thread for whining about rec/unrec feature. Do you know about the ATA forum...? http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=437
|
Shagbark Hickory
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:44 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Often times, posts do not trigger an emotional response that results in people clicking Rec/Unrec |
|
Don't take it personally.
Welcome to the club in fact.
|
Nye Bevan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 12:51 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Too many DUers obsess over recs. |
madinmaryland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 01:37 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Un-recced for starting a thread about the un-rec function. nt |
Liberal_in_LA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
30. rec for the same reason |
Obamanaut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 01:57 PM
Response to Original message |
24. 111 replies kept it on page one of GD for awhile, ensuring visibility. 'unrec' for |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-11-11 02:54 PM by Obamanaut
complaining about rec/unrec.
The OP was read, it generated discussion - isn't that the goal?
Edited to add: Some grammar texts suggest that the use of firstly, secondly, etc. should be avoided. One would probably not say 'seventhly', so why 'secondly'?
One would probably not say "We arrived at the party firstly, and departed lastly."
This was added to point out that the other post was read.
|
Dreamer Tatum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 02:20 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Unrecced this one and that one. Get over self. nt |
pintobean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
WilliamPitt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 02:22 PM
Response to Original message |
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 02:31 PM
Response to Original message |
28. I only Unrecommend posts that are utter bullshit. I didn't read yours. |
|
but anytime the title says something like Capitalism is dead or Capitalism sucks the life juice out of the human soul I just go ahead and Unrecommend it without reading any further.
|
backwoodsbob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 03:51 PM
Response to Original message |
31. here's the problem with this thread |
|
*I wonder how many really interesting threads remain invisible due to this problem?*
Your thread got 111 replies and you are complaining it is invisible?
unrec
|
AngkorWot
(792 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 03:53 PM
Response to Original message |
32. It's like that time I lost that marathon because my running shoes were no good. |
|
Or when I lost on jeopardy because my buzzer was broken.
|
Wait Wut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
33. I thought you had a good point... |
|
...I'm one of the recs.
I don't "unrec" without good cause, but I often "rec" based on original thought. Someone who can make my stubborn brain stop and think gets a rec, even if I disagree. But, I don't always comment.
|
fishwax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-11-11 04:15 PM
Response to Original message |
34. I don't understand how you get from unrecced to invisible |
|
"I wonder how many really interesting threads remain invisible due to this problem?"
What does the one have to do with the other?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 10:02 PM
Response to Original message |