Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One More SEC/Citigroup Sweetheart Deal - Five Reasons to Be Outraged

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-11 12:35 PM
Original message
One More SEC/Citigroup Sweetheart Deal - Five Reasons to Be Outraged
http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/rj-eskow/39079/one-more-sec-citigroup-sweetheart-deal-five-reasons-to-be-outraged

The President says he understands the frustration behind the Occupy Wall Street movement. That's nice. But the anger will keep growing as long as the government keeps handing out free passes instead of perp walks to bankers at serial corporate criminals like Citigroup.

The Administration is finally talking the talk, but without criminal investigations it's not walking the walk. Iit's still not too late. While the SEC's latest deal should outrage you, the Administration can makes things right with two decisive actions.

:snippage:

Here are five reasons you should be outraged. Warning: If you have high blood pressure, you should probably stop reading:

1. Once again, nobody had to confess.

:snip:

2. Once again the criminals won't pay for their crimes - you will.

more at the link --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PETRUS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-11 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yup. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-11 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Don't forget, it was Citi that DROVE the end of the Glass Steagall act.
When they bought Travelers, it basically forced the issue. Citi's new motto: Crooks since 1999.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-11 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. knr, another snip ...
"...The SEC announced yesterday that Citigroup agreed to pay $285 million to settle charges that it misled (synonyms for that word include deceived; lied to; tricke and defrauded) investors in a mortgage securities deal, telling them it was a good investment when it knew otherwise and was secretly betting it would fail.

That kind of behavior isn't just slimy. As the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission found in other instances, it's also illegal..."


And ...

SEC Doing Collusion Deals With Big Banks over Dodgy CDO Deals?

http://news.firedoglake.com/2011/10/21/sec-doing-collusion-deals-with-big-banks-over-dodgy-cdo-deals/

"Yesterday, I acknowledged and came within inches of praising an SEC resolution with Citigroup on a $1 billion mortgage-backed securities deal. They got $285 million in the settlement, all of which went to investors burned on the deal, which was similar to the setup of deals like Abacus or Magentar: end-bubble deals of synthetic CDOs that the bank knew would fail, where they had outside people with an interest in taking the other side of the bet construct the mortgage pool. This was rampantly illegal, and given some of the other settlements in this area, I thought a 28.5% return on the deal was noticeably higher.

But it turns out I was way premature in citing the SEC settlement as anything but craven. According to Pro Publica, Citi settled ALL its liability with the SEC from this one deal, even though they made plenty of other synthetic CDO deals at that time. They get this on the record from a Citi executive...

...Felix Salmon goes further, looking at all of the SEC’s CDO prosecutions. In all cases, they have made only one enforcement action for each bank investigated. That means that they make a high-profile and largely symbolic settlement on one deal, take back a thimble-full of cash, and ignore the dozens of other deals made under exactly the same premises for which they investigated and fined the bank.

...I think Felix uses the right word – collusion.
This is regulatory capture of the first order. It’s different from constructing deliberately complex and confusing rules that will never be administered, or just looking the other way at misconduct. This generates the illusion of regulatory enforcement while letting off the offending parties for next to nothing. The exact same premise is at work with the Obama Justice Department’s attempted get out of jail free card for foreclosure fraud. It certainly makes the banks happy, but it’s also a primary reason why there are protesters in Zuccotti Park and across the country.

...Felix asks, “Is the SEC trying to protect the banks it’s meant to be prosecuting?” It sure looks that way."






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-11 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-11 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick again! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devil_Fish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-21-11 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Great article. Read the whole thing! K&R NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-11 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC