ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-11 07:54 PM
Original message |
I'm coming to think the Republican hierarchy doesn't really want to get rid of Obama |
|
It is very surprising to me that the Republican leadership in the Congress have not begun moves to impeach President Obama over the lawless, or "extrajudicial" as it has been called, killing of US citizens. If they really wanted to they could get rid of him over that. The House would certainly be willing to get on board and on the Senate side the Turtle has publicly stated that his main priority is to get rid of Obama. There are enough turn-coat Democrats on the Senate side to make it possible to remove Obama from office ... if they were to go after him.
But not a word.
You've got to ask yourself, why? Its certainly not fear of Biden.
|
bluestate10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-11 07:59 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Alrighty. A new line of attack on President Obama. |
|
I must admire your ilk, you never give up. Even after being pounded into the ground by superior logic and simple common sense.
|
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-11 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. What the fuck are you talking about? |
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-11 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. You said, the "lawless" killing of U.S. citizens, despite the fact |
|
that Obama had gotten legal opinions before he went ahead.
|
NashVegas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-11 08:00 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Some years ago, I found myself in conversation with a retired military type who had any number of complaints - many that actually seemed somewhat legitimate - about Bill Clinton. I asked him why the VRWC didn't go after Clinton on all that and instead went for Paula Jones & Monica, and his reply was that they didn't want to damage the office.
Just like Democrats had any number of reasons to impeach Bush & Cheney and failed to. Alas, no sex scandal to do the work for them.
They want whomever is in office (when it's THEIR guy) to have the same power to abuse that office, unimpeded.
|
Kennah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-11 08:21 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Umm. So you mean, like. What? |
NNN0LHI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-11 08:27 PM
Response to Original message |
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-11 08:29 PM
Response to Original message |
6. They'd never get 2/3 of the Senate. No way. n/t |
Swede
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-11 08:33 PM
Response to Original message |
customerserviceguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-26-11 08:50 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Because the "citizens" executed |
|
Had it coming. Even Repukes know that.
When I saw the title of your OP, I figured it was about the weak-ass field that the Rethugs have in front of them this election year.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 09:21 AM
Response to Original message |