ErikJ
(480 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-11 10:18 PM
Original message |
Republicans' war on science and reason |
|
By Katrina vanden Heuvel, Published: October 24 | Updated: Tuesday, October 25, 5:00 AM Washington Post
...The contempt with which the party views reason is staggering. Republicans have become proudly and unquestionably anti-science. (It is their litmus test, though they would probably reject the science behind litmus paper.) With the exception of Jon Huntsman, who polls about as well as Darwin would in a Republican primary, the Republican presidential candidates have either denied the existence of climate change, denied that it has been caused — and can be reversed — by man, or apologized for once holding a different view. They have come to this conclusion not because the science is inconclusive, but because they believe, as a matter of principle, that scientific evidence is no evidence at all.
..............This kind of guttural rejection of reason, evidence and science trickles into just about every aspect of Republican ideology. There’s Herman Cain’s much-discussed 9-9-9 plan, for example, which has been eviscerated by independents, conservative and progressive economists alike, but which Cain continues to champion. Why? Because, he argues, the skeptics haven’t read his analysis yet — as if he is entitled not just to his own facts but to his own math.
snip
|
eppur_se_muova
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-11 11:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Guttural: I do not think that word means what you think it means. Rachel did the same thing on a show recently.
|
ErikJ
(480 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-11 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
eppur_se_muova
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-11 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Thanks. I like her suggestion for a bumper sticker ... |
|
"Repeal the 20th Century. Vote GOP."
|
Electric Monk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-11 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. being or marked by utterance that is strange, unpleasant, or disagreeable |
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-11 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
If I'm not mistaken it refers to the sound of words that are formed - how to say this - sort of deep in the throat. Sort of like the sound is coming from the gut is how I think of it. There is another meaning too, but you don't see it used much. There is something that happens to foals, young horses, where their necks swell up badly. Its called a gutteral something (it sounds like they are saying purse or pouch or something like that, but imagine it in German) or another; I've heard old Amish farmers use the phrase a few times.
|
opihimoimoi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-11 07:45 AM
Response to Original message |
5. The GOPers Embarrass Themselves with their Emotional Simplicity rejecting Reason Logic Facts |
ErikJ
(480 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-11 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
ErikJ
(480 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Oct-29-11 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. When the Independents tell you that both sides "do it" |
|
which also means lie, my favorite response is that the Republicans lie so much they are willing to DENY SCIENCE!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 11:10 PM
Response to Original message |