Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TRO Denied; No Tents!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 04:47 PM
Original message
TRO Denied; No Tents!
Edited on Tue Nov-15-11 04:52 PM by Hosnon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Live at Zuccotti, they haven't yet heard, but I expect chants when they do:
Edited on Tue Nov-15-11 04:51 PM by Fire Walk With Me
http://www.ustream.tv/TheOther99

"No tents, no sleeping bags."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. So he finally found a judge ... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Judge shopping worked....
Disgusting and pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. This judge was assigned by normal court procedures; NLG shopped for the previous one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. No, the original Judge was removed without cause...
Her name and possibly others were left off the list of 'candidates' to replace her. That IS Judge shopping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Lucy Billings was contacted at her home by lawyers for OWS
She was not the judge on after hours duty in the courts last night. The judge on duty, after being contacted later, let her proceed.

The judge for the hearing was selected at random from the slate of judges who would normally hear cases of these type.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. How does this change the fact it was Judge shopping....
"The judge on duty let her proceed." In doing that, it had the effect of handing over the case to her. Removing her without cause after her ruling and, given she had heard and ruled on the case, prohibiting her from being on the list of candidates was Judge shopping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. The lawyers for OWS did the shopping by selecting her; Stallman was picked at random
out of the slate of judges who were regular candidates. They just undid the judge shopping of the OWS lawyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. LOL, keep trying, it is quite humorous!
It is the removal of the Judge without cause and then excluding that Judge, after her having heard AND ruled on the case, from being on the list of candidates that is judge shopping. The judge was qualified to hear the case, the judge on the 'call list' obviously agreed as he/she did not step in after being called, yet she was removed without cause. To equate the lawyers of OWS calling the Judge in hopes she would hear the case being the same as those who REMOVED the judge after her ruling to be the same relative to power is beyond ludicrous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. What will OWS' reaction be? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. San Diego will be the model
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. knr nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Interesting, the lawyers for OWS are saying....
while the order upholds the 'no tents, structures', there is NO mention of sleeping bags, prohibiting entering the park immediately, staying in the park 24/7.

OWS is appealing this decision which would be expected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. "Tim" is saying a text alert went out rallying everyone to Liberty Square. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Good! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. Staging areas where those "off duty" can rest while other go out in shifts
to occupy is my immediate thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC