Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wait not agian! Neutrino experiment repeat at Cern finds same result

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
RegieRocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:22 PM
Original message
Wait not agian! Neutrino experiment repeat at Cern finds same result
The team which found that neutrinos may travel faster than light has carried out an improved version of their experiment - and confirmed the result.

If confirmed by other experiments, the find could undermine one of the basic principles of modern physics.

Critics of the first report in September had said that the long bunches of neutrinos (tiny particles) used could introduce an error into the test.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15791236

Take that and smoke it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. There's shit out there that travels faster than light, trust me.
Any time a scientist says there's some limit, and I don't care if it's Einstein or anyone else, I get suspicious.

It's just a matter of time before it's proven.

And then something else will come along to be contested.

I love science!

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Trust you? That's evidence?! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MjolnirTime Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. The evidence is in the data from CERN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
30. given that this is what, the third confirmation of this fact... trusting
him is probably pretty good odds. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. Well, maybe, but it's just the way he put it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
28. Except that Einstein deduced relativity by realizing that time and space would be all fucked up if
things werent that way.

I suspect relativity is safe. It's been experimentally validated repeatedly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supply Side Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #28
40. subspace!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. subgenius!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supply Side Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Gene Roddenberry was pretty much a prophet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasTowelie Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. I will.
I mean, I did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. The neutrinos didn't really go fdaster than light.
They phoned ahead to some of their identical twin neutrino brothers and had them step in as ringers at the finish line. Kind of like you and your twin cheating on the marathon race by having him hide out near the finish line. Take my word for it. That's how those sneaky neutrinos pulled it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. Quantum entanglement
I agree, that's probably what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
21. You Know, Sir, You May Think You Are Joking, But You May Be On To Something....
Edited on Sun Nov-20-11 12:17 AM by The Magistrate
Modern physics is quite beyond me; these people bewilder and baffle me to the point of genuine aggravation. But one thing does seem to stand out about quantum effects, namely, that they are weird as all get out. The Greeks used to say that what was beautiful was true, and you will still see the elegance of a theory or its mathematics referenced as an indication it is,or at least ought to be, true. Well, at the quantum effect level, it seems it is not beauty that is truth, but weirdness. The idea that a particle creates duplicates of itself in advance of its movement strikes me as just the sort of idea these physicists nowadays would come up with...and maybe it is true....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #21
38. I've been watching the Nova shows of late, talking about string theory
and how it related to relativity...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. This might be closer to the actuality than you might believe.
It isn't that the neutrino actually travelled the distance faster than c, it's that already covered the observable distance before it started.

It would be more like having a twin neutrino standing at the finish line an hour before the race even started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
27. I heard that light just slowed down for a moment to let the neutrinos pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. Did the neutrinos even signal that they were passing? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Light could disCERN that they were coming by.
I hate myself for typing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #36
43. You had to do it!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. I love it, how science actually works
and no, I do not intend to try to explain this to you again...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Looking forward to independent confirmation. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. We may not know as much as we felt ...
if so, the Gods are laughing at us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. All You Zombies..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E2%80%94All_You_Zombies%E2%80%94

Narrative order of events
The story involves an intricate series of time-travel journeys. It begins with a young man speaking to the narrator, the Bartender, in 1970. The young man is called the Unmarried Mother, because he writes stories for confession magazines, many of them presumably from the point of view of an unmarried mother.

Cajoled by the Bartender, the Unmarried Mother explains why he understands the female viewpoint so well: he was born a girl, in 1945, and raised in an orphanage. While a fairly ugly teenager in 1963, he (that is, she) was seduced, impregnated, and abandoned by an older man. During the delivery of her child, doctors discovered she had an intersex condition: internally, she had both male and female sex organs. Complications during delivery forced them to give her a sex change. The baby was later kidnapped and not seen again. The now-former girl had to adjust to being a man and surviving as such, despite being unprepared for any job. As a girl he/she had preferred etiquette lessons, hoping to join an organization dedicated to providing "comfort and companionship" to astronauts, known at various times by the elaborate acronyms "W.E.N.C.H.E.S." (Women's Emergency National Corps, Hospitality & Entertainment Section), "A.N.G.E.L.S." (Auxiliary Nursing Group, Extraterrestrial Legions), and the Women's Hospitality Order Refortifying & Encouraging Spacemen (the only name without its acronym spelled out in the story, "W.H.O.R.E.S."). Handicapped by the physical aftereffects of childbirth, he used his secretarial skills to type manuscripts, and eventually began writing.

Professing sympathy, the Bartender offers to top his story. He guides him into a back room, and casts a net over the two of them. This is part of a time machine. The young man is set loose in 1963 where he dates, falls for, seduces, impregnates, and leaves a young girl; at the same time the Bartender goes forward eleven months, kidnaps a baby and takes it to an orphanage in 1945. He then returns to 1963, and picks up the Unmarried Mother, who is just beginning to realize what has happened. As the Bartender tells him, "Now you know who he is—and after you think it over you'll know who you are . . . and if you think hard enough, you'll figure out who the baby is . . . and who I am."
T
he Bartender then drops the Unmarried Mother—his younger self—at an outpost of the Temporal Bureau, a time-traveling secret police force that causes events in history to protect the human race. He has just recruited himself.
Finally the Bartender returns to 1970, arriving a short time after he left the bar. He allows a customer to play "I'm My Own Grandpa" on the jukebox, having yelled at the customer for playing the song before he left. Closing the bar he time travels again to his home base. As he beds down for a much deserved rest, he contemplates the scar left over from the Caesarean section performed when he gave birth to his daughter, father, mother and entire history. He thinks "I know where I came from—but where did all you zombies come from?".



:crazy:

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegieRocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. They don't get it. Impossible for zombies.
But there was some important information on CDC for Zombie protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Yeah, I saw a van a few days ago at the flea market that had this on it..


A big one on the back..

I didn't realize that was the CDC..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegieRocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #16
24. Not sure about that but much is coded and most don't get it
like this
www.youtube.com/watch?v=4a6YdNmK77k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. The only change they made to the experiment was to shorten the pulse duration..
to 3 ns.

We did have an exciting result coming out of the HCP conference last week, but this wasn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. They intend to repeat it at Livermore
Edited on Sat Nov-19-11 11:48 PM by nadinbrzezinski
I am concerned that the size of the Collider might actually prevent them from getting meaningful results... (Yes very much lay understanding but size matters in speeds achieved)... we enter into error in the instrument if indeed they are not getting the right result.

If they are... it opens doors to new avenues of research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MjolnirTime Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. why cling to the old ways with your eyes shut tightly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. What old ways?
Imagine this result is verified. Then what? it's not even a violation of SR, which we already know is wrong. It won't bring down GR so why pin your hopes to it?

I applaud the work and effort that went into this experiment. The hype has been overdone, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. Huh. Well, I'll be interested to see more tests.
Sounds like they still have possible errors to rule out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Einstein predicted infinite mass the closer a particle accelerated closer to light speed.
He never considered a particle that already traveled faster than the limit of light speed at creation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegieRocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yea yea yea. More blathering. Hard to swallow isn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-19-11 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. I Believe It's Called... 4G...
:hide::evilgrin::hide:

:rofl:

:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
17. What if it's not some quantum effect?
It's difficult for me to explain, but it could require further examination of theories of quantum physics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
22. But weren't we supposed to be sucked into a black hole right about now?
Maybe we were. I'm always the last to find out about such things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegieRocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. That was the ecconomic crash
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
29. And you believe this proves what?
Again, I think the fact that the Neutrinos from Supernova 1987A didn't show up in, say, 1984 prove that widespread superluminal neutrino transport across large distances is unlikely.

The most interesting potential explanation I've seen for these results is the notion- admittedly not fleshed out- that the neutrinos may be taking shortcuts across the kaluza-klein dimensions required for something like string theory.

The most idiotic "explanation" I've seen (using the term loosely) is "THIS PROVES THAT THE HOUSE OF SCIENCE IS COMING DOWN!" or that somehow this validates the cluck-nuttery of creationists and the other Vatican financed waterheads at the Discovery Institute.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Nerd wars. this is awesome. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. ROFLMAO !!!
:rofl::rofl::rofl:

Doesn't get much funnier, er... better than that.

:evilgrin:

:hi:

:kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. backatcha, love.
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #31
39. Damn straight.
Saturday motherfucking night. Right here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
32. Is deja vu faster than light?
I'm sure I've asked this question before...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
42. Oh, the horror! They'll have to lay some of them off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shadowflash Donating Member (180 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
44. Not new information
I saw this when it first came out 30 days from now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
46. Take that and smoke it?...
:rofl:

Faster than light finding faulted in new neutrino test

An international group of scientists says that the speed of light has not been broken, rejecting a "faster than light" particle claim made recently which cast doubt on Albert Einstein's century-old ideas about relativity.

The new paper, published in the online journal arxiv.org/abs/1110.3763v2, contradicts the findings of fellow researchers at Italy's Gran Sasso laboratory, who said their experiments with a neutrino beam registered particles flying faster than the speed of light.


http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-205_162-57328668/faster-than-light-finding-faulted-in-new-neutrino-test

'Faster-than-light' observations reined in

The same subatomic particles clocked going faster than light speed by European scientists show signs indicating they are moving at only the speed of light, says a group of Italian physicists.

The ICARUS collaboration based their conclusion on an independent analysis of particles known as neutrinos generated at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, and travelling to Gran Sasso, Italy.


http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2011/11/21/science-neutrinos-light-speed.html

Sid



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC