Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you believe that the USA is an oligarchy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Admiral Loinpresser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 05:14 PM
Original message
Poll question: Do you believe that the USA is an oligarchy
maintained in that status by the two major political parties?

And the banks -- hard to believe in a time when we're facing a banking crisis that many of the banks created -- are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place.


Senator Dick Durbin, c. April 29, 2009

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/29/dick-durbin-banks-frankly_n_193010.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, We are a Constitutional democracy.
Its our fault we vote stupid. Michele Bachman is proof and Minnesota is supposed to be a better educated state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Admiral Loinpresser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What do you think about Justice Brandeis's quote?
"We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both."

Louis D. Brandeis (Supreme Court Judge)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I'd never heard it before. But
I don't agree because we have both now. The 99% just don't know how to vote in their best interest.

Peoples families are often in the same demographics and have big arguments on party affiliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Admiral Loinpresser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I guess we'll have to disagree about Brandeis.
In my experience, it is generally true that anyone with enough money to greatly outspend his opponent can win political office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Well, Meg Whitman, Linda McMahon, and Carly Fiorina are all very wealthy
reasonably decent women and they all lost big in a GOP year (2010).

There is hope!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Admiral Loinpresser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Certainly there are years like 2010 and 1994,
when incumbency is less significant. But the larger political trend is toward greater entrenched power for the 1%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The only people who voted for her are the people in her own district.
However, I cannot claim my district did any better - we have craavack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. If we ever were... We certainly are not now. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. What state do you live in??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banned from Kos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Georgia --- lol... I have two terrible Senators and a far-right Congresman
named Tom Price. Atlanta has one of the highest foreclosure rates in the country outside of the Southwest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. See, there are enough assine republicans to stink up this whole country
No state is immune

I guess the people of Minnesota are so proud of our Michele that we just wish to share her with the rest of the country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trackfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. According to Syme, virtually all governments are oligarchies. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The two stable forms of government are monarchy and oligarchy
Democracy is a transitional form generally found either in small homogeneous communities, or large communities with low populations and large resources.

Once population and resources are in balance, democracy evolves towards oligarchy and a complex heirarchical structure.

In case of severe disruption such as plague, war, revolution, a "strong man" usually takes over in alliance with the lower classes and social mobility increases. Over time, the center gives up power to the oligarchy.

Thus, most societies in the long run oscillated between a strong king and powerful barons. Charlemagne was a strong king. Under his weaker sucessors, the barons became more powerful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Do you have evidence from elsewhere than the shithole that was Europe for the last 2K years?
Does this theory hold up in Asia? Africa? The Middle East? South America?

We already know that Europe has some deeply systemic problems with power, but there's no reason to assume without evidence that they are universal or necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Look at the dynastic sucesssions in China, Japan, Egypt, etc.
Generally the new dynasty starts with the concentration of power in the dynastic founder, following a military victory over internal or external foes. However, the problem of sucession typically allows power to flow outward to great landowners, military official, bureaucrats, etc. who form power bases of their own. When this diffusion of power becomes inheritable, the monarch becomes progressively weaker.

In Latin America, the "man on horseback" who brings military order to a country is a well known phenomenon. However, as time passes, power goes out to the latifunda, cardinals, generals, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Locrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-20-11 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. voting
Big deal, we get to vote for corporate robot "A" or corporate robot "B".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC