Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone else wonder if Palin's planning to jump in, to save the party from Romney?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 08:35 PM
Original message
Anyone else wonder if Palin's planning to jump in, to save the party from Romney?
I can't believe that Newt will be successful, in the long run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
teddy51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not sure she would be a serious candidate at this time, but I do see someone
such as Jeb Bush jumping in, with a Rove brain again. This has always been my fear, cause the current list of candidates on the right, suck big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. I was thinking that myself......
Romney just can't seem to get the loonies interested in him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SomethingFishy Donating Member (552 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Interesting isn't it... you have to wonder what the Republican
strategy is here. THey cannot win with a loony candidate. They need someone independents can vote for and Romney is that guy, if he stops pandering to the loonyasfuckistan folks. The Republicans are
going to bury themselves using every freak they can find as a leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teddy51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. But Romney has already put a major hole in his boat with his ongoing
flip/flopping. He can't be taken serious as a candidate either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. He's been waving and yelling "pick me, pick me" for ages, yet
he still can't seem to lock it up.

Of course his notorious flip-flopping has everyone on that side dissing him.

There's nothing more enjoyable than a food fight in a dysfunctional family's kitchen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's way too late for CaribouBarbie to jump in. Jan 3 is Iowa and Jan 10
is New Hampshire. There is no savior for the Republicans. They dealt their own hand and have to chose from the Jokers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Haven't people ever jumped in at this point before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. I don't know but the money and logistics of getting a ground game in these early
Edited on Mon Nov-21-11 10:38 PM by neverforget
states would be the biggest hurdle. I just don't see how it could be done in the time left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-22-11 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
27. Maybe they're still counting on Fred Thompson. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. I hope so. If your enemy is drowning, throw them an anchor.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Filing deadlines have passed already in some states.
Too late for Palin or anyone else to get in. I don't think she would take the paycut anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Isn't it possible to win without being in all the primaries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Sure it is.
But if someone dominates the early primaries they will probably have the momentum for the nomination. Now it is possible that no one will have the required delegates by the time of the convention. That has not happened since TV started televising conventions. The parties don't like their fights to be shown on tv. But if that happens the delegates could choose anyone -- even someone who had not announced to that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh man, I wish!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. She could only do so in the context of a brokered convention.
Edited on Mon Nov-21-11 09:15 PM by tritsofme
Filing deadlines have already passed in many states. She has no campaign infrastructure.

This is not going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Genealogist Donating Member (495 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think it will be a very interesting primary season
Republicans everywhere will be trying to decide if they want the candidate who endorses the return of child labor, or the one who wants people to suffer in the best Christian tradition, someone who seems to have built a career on flip-flopping...the list goes on. There is going to be some serious nose-holding during the first few months of next year. I honestly don't think this birther crap is going to help the GOPers, since the people who buy into it are already going to vote for the republican. It'll be interesting to see what they will lay at President Obama's doorstep, once that party finally gets behind one of the clowns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. It's like they are all competing
to see which one can be the craziest. Newt for child labor, Romney is tepid and nobody likes him, and Cain with enough sexual harassment incidents to forever tarnish his campaign.

They might as well just flip a coin, because no one they have is electable. Hard core Republicans will end up voting for whichever clown gets the nomination, but they are going to end up with a serious enthusiasm problem in one way or another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. Donald trump is considering getting back in according to news/book pimping today (nt)
Edited on Mon Nov-21-11 09:16 PM by The Straight Story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. They don't have anyone
Palin won't run. She's not taken seriously anymore by the vast majority of Republicans, and Independents never took her seriously to begin with. They essentially have nothing but a bunch of clowns. I doubt seriously that Romney even comes close to getting the nomination.

It's probably going to come down to Cain and Newt. It makes me laugh my butt off every time I imagine how this is going to turn out. Both of these guys have so many skeletons in their closets I'm surprised they have a place for their clothes. Nobody has had to do anything to sabotage any of the Republican candidates - they've all sabotaged themselves one way or the other. It's hilarious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
procon Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. A Brokered Republican National Convention?
Neither the Republican leaders or their voters are thrilled with the 2012 smörgåsbord of rejects. It would be the ultimate piece GOP stage craft if they could pull it off and nominate some dream candidate from the wings.

It would probably turn the 2012 Republican National Convention into a theater of the absurd with a mysterious dark-horse candidate, betrayals, threats, fighting camps -- dare I hope for a duel? -- of delegates, back door deals, high drama... everything you need for great entertainment television.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. That mysterious dark-horse candidate could be Jeb ridding in on a white horse
I've seen nothing but stalking horses so far.

A brokered convention is certainly a possibility

Nothing shocks me anymore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. I think she crunched the numbers, and decided her current path is more lucrative.
That's the bottom line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Troop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. I don't think the Presidency pays as much as she hopes to get from
staying on the outside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. I think that there
is a 60-40 chance that she'll run 3rd party if Willard Romney is nominated by the republican party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I agree with you.
I've always thought that if she was going to run, it would be as a third-party candidate. Maybe it's why she was trying to sound more reasonable in that latest editorial that's been posted here a couple of times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. She demands attention.
She might do it simply to increase her ability to sell books & tour. She might be attempting to take the republican establishment hostage. But she isn't going to go gently into that insignificant night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-21-11 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. There's also a 60-40 chance one of the Koch brothers has her shot if she tries it
The last thing the Republicans need is Sarah Palin siphoning off teabaggers, which is what'll happen if she runs a third-party campaign.

If Palin runs a third-party campaign against Romney there's a very real possibility Obama will take Idaho. The various teabagger groups will go for Palin, the Mormons (the lower half of this state is North Utah and there's no shortage of them in North Idaho either) will go for Romney, the "independents" who are pissed that the state GOP excluded them from voting Republican in the primary will stay home, and the rest of us will put Idaho's four EV into the Democratic tally for the first time since...well, forever.

Which, of course, will make editing Letters to the Editor especially fun for the first six months of 2013.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC