Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Britain unites with smaller countries to block US bid to legalise cluster bombs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 04:22 AM
Original message
Britain unites with smaller countries to block US bid to legalise cluster bombs


A coalition of countries including Britain on Friday defeated an attempt by the US, Russia, China and Israel to get an international agreement approving the continued use of cluster bombs. The weapons, which have been used in Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon scatter "bomblets" over a wide area, maiming and killing civilians, notably children, long after they have been dropped and are banned under a 2008 convention which was adopted by the UK and in more than 100 countries. The US, refused to sign and in negotiations in Geneva, over the past two weeks pressed for a protocol to be added to a UN convention to provide legal cover for the continuing use of cluster munitions. But smaller countries, supported by agencies including Amnesty and Oxfam, refused to give way.

Thomas Nash, director of Article 36, a group which coordinated opposition to cluster munitions, said: "The rejection of this attempt to set up a weaker standard on cluster bombs shows that states can act on the basis of humanitarian imperatives and can prevail in the face of cynical pressure from other states".

He added: "It shows that it is not only the US and other so called major powers that call the shots in international affairs, but that when small and medium sized countries work together with civil society and international organisations we can set the agenda and get results".

snip..



The US and its supporters argued that their proposal would allow the use of cluster bombs manufactured after 1980 and that these had a less than 1% failure rate. Opponents said that most bombs produced before 1980 are unusable and that modern cluster munitions have failure rates much higher than the manufacturers claim.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/25/us-cluster-bombs-bid-blocked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
limpyhobbler Donating Member (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Arguing for cluster bombs at the UN
not our proudest moment...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. A total of 111 UN member states have already signed up to the Oslo convention
A total of 111 UN member states have already signed up to the Oslo convention prohibiting the production, transfer, and use of cluster munitions. The US, Israel, Russia and China have not.

The US position on the new 'understanding' on cluster bombs is a con.
'We are against cluster bombs made before 1980'

1980????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Has to do with fusing technology in use
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. I wish Princess Diana wa alive.
She was fiercely opposed to cluster bombs.

She had the power to bring an immense amount of attention to this issue. Her opposition wouldn't have been a minimal gesture. It could have had an impact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newfie11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. GOOD, Someone needs to block us!
I am sick of our war mongering country and the pain, misery we have and are causing world wide. All built on lies to make the rich richer!!!:mad: :banghead:
and how long before we do this! :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. DU used to be anti war....
I'm surprised that this tread doesn't get the acknowledgment
that it should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. This is not a block or any kind of setback
What would have been a limited use role which could have later been tightened now does not exist. The existing treaty is not universally recognized and is therefore ineffectual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newfie11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. thanks for explaining
So this sucks even more!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. Dupicate thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. For once the UK hasn't been a total sellout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelMcGuire Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. UK in 2008 topped the world table of weapons sales
Edited on Sat Nov-26-11 11:52 AM by MichaelMcGuire
According to the guardian //edited// And I don't think its stopped selling arms.


Got this off the bbc

Arms exports to Africa and Middle East
Country Value (year to Sept 10)* Examples 2009/10
SOURCE: COMMITTEES ON ARMS EXPORTS CONTROLS, DEPT FOR BUSINESS INNOVATION AND SKILLS (*COVERS MILITARY AND OTHER RESTRICTED LICENCES).

Algeria
£270m
Components for military utility vehicles, combat helicopters, military utility helicopter

Bahrain
£6.4m
Assault rifles, submachine guns, shotguns, sniper rifles, CS hand grenades, smoke ammunition, stun grenades, tear gas/riot control agents

Egypt
£16.8m
Machine guns, imaging cameras, electronic warfare equipment, components for semi-automatic pistols

Iraq
£424m
Machine guns, assault rifles, small arms ammunition, stun grenades, semi-automatic pistols, smoke cannisters, fragmentation rockets

Jordan
£20.2m
Armoured personnel carriers, CS hand grenades, submachine guns, tear gas/irritant ammunition, armoured fighting vehicles, grenade launchers

Kuwait
£7.3m
Small arms ammunition, submachine guns, armoured personnel carriers, hand grenades, military utility vehicles

Libya
£214.7m
Combat shotguns, tear gas/irritant ammunition, command control and intelligence equipment, crowd control ammunition

Morocco
£2.1m
Shotguns, components for combat aircraft, components for large calibre artillery, components for armoured fighting vehicles

Oman
£11.8m
Small arms ammunition, semi-automatic pistols, components for tanks and armoured vehicles, submachine guns, tear gas/irritant ammunition, CS hand grenades, stun grenades

Qatar
£11.1m
Components for combat aircraft, heavy machine guns, CS hand grenades, small arms ammunition, stun grenades, tear gas/irritant ammunition

Saudi Arabia
£139.5m
Components for combat aircraft, CS hand grenades, tear gas/irritant ammunition, tear gas/riot control agents, sniper rifles, armoured personnel carriers

Syria
£2.7m
Equipment employing cryptography, small arms ammunition

Tunisia
£4.5m
Components for assault rifles, components for machine guns, components for semi-automatic pistols

United Arab Emirates
£208.2m
Assault rifles, components for machine guns, submachine guns, shotguns, small arms ammunition

Yemen
£0.3m
Body armour, night vision goggles, components and technology for military cameras
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. It is glad to ban what it does not sell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelMcGuire Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. promoting them?
Edited on Sat Nov-26-11 11:56 AM by MichaelMcGuire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Not surprising at a defense trade show
IIRC the UK does not manufacture them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichaelMcGuire Donating Member (240 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. banned I think from last year??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. That's why I said 'For once'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. CBUs are not illegal nor banned by the Geneva Accords
The current treaty is not universally recognized nor supported, The Guardian's hyperbole not withstanding.

The defeated effort would have been the first UNIVERSALLY RECOGNIZED restriction of CBUs. So rather than get a partial restriction that could be expanded, there is none. Good move there buckos.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
12. Will Obama get another Peace Prize for this act of humanity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC