|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 02:57 PM Original message |
Sexy pot ads provoke debate over medical marijuana goals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
1. Oh Please. I had a Big Pharma rep as a roommate once. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 03:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. No, don't ban the products. Ban the objectification in ads. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 03:10 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. OH I would love it too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 03:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I read it as them wanting to be extra careful in image management... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. It's about 'toning it down', obviously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:35 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 07:12 PM Response to Reply #16 |
112. The thinkpol is working on that one too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 04:41 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Oh brother, here we go again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:06 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. I thought it was about 'education', not 'banning'? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:24 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. Pornography != objectification in advertising. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:26 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Oh, okay. So you're NOT in favor of banning "porn", just 'objectification in ads' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:28 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. We put restrictions on all kinds of ads. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:31 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Oh, so now it's "restrictions", huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 02:29 PM Response to Reply #22 |
79. "I don't know what objectifying is..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 02:32 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. Who doesn't know what it is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 03:25 PM Response to Reply #81 |
88. No, you've made a decision and formed an opinion as to what is.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 03:33 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. Since this conversation originated when I mentioned the laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 03:43 PM Response to Reply #89 |
92. Trust the government to define those things? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 03:48 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. Are you not trusting them to define discrimination? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 04:01 PM Response to Reply #93 |
95. There are plenty of folks who would wish to defund.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 04:03 PM Response to Reply #95 |
96. Do you sincerely believe that Norway and Denmark are in bed with the far right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 04:17 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. Didn't say that.....guess you are being obtuse again or just can't read thru your vitriol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 04:31 PM Response to Reply #97 |
99. Again, not making sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 07:23 PM Response to Reply #93 |
113. I don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 06:17 PM Response to Reply #81 |
101. "objectification" is a bullshit term that DOESN'T MEAN ANYTHING. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 06:24 PM Response to Reply #101 |
102. Yes. Two of the most progressive countries in the world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 06:31 PM Response to Reply #102 |
104. So EVERY LAW that Denmark passes makes sense, then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 06:36 PM Response to Reply #102 |
107. They could pass a law mandating that people clean up their unicorn turds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 08:11 PM Response to Reply #102 |
114. Laws result from public opinion, which is often wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-30-11 07:32 AM Response to Reply #114 |
119. Logic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-30-11 09:55 AM Response to Reply #119 |
120. Logic seems to be missing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-30-11 10:48 AM Response to Reply #120 |
121. This is exasperating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-30-11 11:03 AM Response to Reply #121 |
122. Sorry, but I'm going to have to invoke Godwin here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 10:12 AM Response to Reply #21 |
65. We went from sexy ads to Porn ROFL ROFL ROFL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 10:32 AM Response to Reply #65 |
70. Some people seem to be obsessed with it. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 01:59 PM Response to Reply #70 |
76. Obviously, yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:14 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. Strange the way the word "ban" always seems to come up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:21 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. no, no one wants to ban |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:38 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. It's all the fault of the evil great patriarchy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 02:32 PM Response to Reply #20 |
80. Oh...shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texasgal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:39 PM Response to Reply #18 |
27. Why are you all jumping on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:44 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. It says that we as a society prefer to make decisions based on emotion over logic and reason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texasgal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:54 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. How sad that as a society |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 07:10 PM Response to Reply #28 |
35. true. and targeting medical marijuana for men, rather than men and women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texasgal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 07:26 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. Yes, I agree! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 08:01 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. if they want to market recreational cannabis to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texasgal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 08:15 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 08:30 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 09:02 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. I would not be offended by an ad w/ charlie parker with an erection selling kind bud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texasgal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 09:24 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. Glad to hear that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 10:11 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. LOL. good to know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 10:53 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. I think it's sort of goofy, personally, and I do think it undercuts the "medical" angle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 11:18 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. me too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 10:40 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. oh, and btw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 11:12 PM Response to Reply #44 |
50. that is easy to say. BUT.. it wont happen. that is the issue. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 12:33 AM Response to Reply #50 |
52. How about we work to get it legal, regulated, and taxed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 07:28 AM Response to Reply #52 |
60. people can always "advertise it however the fuck they want". and other people can call it out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 08:46 AM Response to Reply #60 |
61. naked men are used for advertisements. one male porn star is very popular with girls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 09:19 AM Response to Reply #61 |
62. true 'nough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 09:46 AM Response to Reply #62 |
63. the traditional view is that porn is for men |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 10:06 AM Response to Reply #63 |
64. ya. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 10:16 AM Response to Reply #64 |
66. okay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 10:28 AM Response to Reply #66 |
68. lol. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 06:35 PM Response to Reply #63 |
106. "I don't think you're going to stop men from enjoying looking at women" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 03:37 PM Response to Reply #61 |
91. Wow, that's weird |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Withywindle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 04:25 PM Response to Reply #91 |
98. I think the reason men in Cenk's situation feel threatened isn't jealousy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 06:16 PM Response to Reply #60 |
100. You really think that the big problem around pot is sexy ads in alt. weeklies? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 06:41 PM Response to Reply #100 |
108. the thread is about the women in bikinis in the ad. the conversation is the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 06:45 PM Response to Reply #108 |
110. No, it's pretty specific to medical marijuana, and I suspect the motivation of the Med. MJ players |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 09:11 PM Response to Reply #110 |
115. what a j0ke.. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 09:37 PM Response to Reply #115 |
116. That's a vacu0us resp0nse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:48 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. I'll tell you what bothers me.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texasgal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:53 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. I honestly do not care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:59 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Spot on! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texasgal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 07:08 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. I guess it's just weird to me that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 07:12 PM Response to Reply #34 |
36. but these people cheer the exploitation of women because it works in their frame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texasgal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 07:17 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. I guess the advertisers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 10:44 AM Response to Reply #34 |
71. Yeah, I'm not surprised AT ALL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 09:42 PM Response to Reply #71 |
117. I want pouty lipped scantily clad beauties everywhere! Everywhere, I say! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-30-11 04:41 PM Response to Reply #29 |
124. Carlin said it best |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snooper2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 10:17 AM Response to Reply #27 |
67. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 10:30 AM Response to Reply #67 |
69. hence, the in general |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-30-11 04:37 PM Response to Reply #27 |
123. No, it doesn't bother me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 07:02 PM Response to Reply #3 |
33. How does one determine what is objectifying? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 08:59 PM Response to Reply #33 |
43. If you get a cogent, specific, logically consistent answer to thatr one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 02:29 AM Response to Reply #43 |
59. Feminists can't even agree on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 09:26 PM Response to Reply #33 |
46. Deleted message |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 01:38 AM Response to Reply #3 |
56. .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awoke_in_2003 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 02:18 AM Response to Reply #3 |
58. you are speaking of civilized countries... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 10:47 AM Response to Reply #58 |
72. Yes, I'm not exactly holding my breath. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awoke_in_2003 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-30-11 01:58 AM Response to Reply #72 |
118. liberals have embraced these things... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 02:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
77. It's doubtful that it will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 02:24 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. What idea is it that you think has been soundly debunked? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 03:01 PM Response to Reply #78 |
83. The claims made for cause and effect have been soundly debunked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 03:03 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. I stopped reading at "porn". We are not discussing porn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 03:08 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 03:17 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. We're also not discussing the etymology of the term. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 03:24 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 03:34 PM Response to Reply #87 |
90. It's called staying on topic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 06:28 PM Response to Reply #90 |
103. Please. It's called avoiding the issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 06:35 PM Response to Reply #103 |
105. Apparently you're not reading my posts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Nikon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 06:41 PM Response to Reply #105 |
109. Not anymore I'm not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 03:29 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Ha! You should see my cousin! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 05:59 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. He didn't have to wear a push up bra - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:09 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. That would be a sight to see!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
era veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 12:54 AM Response to Reply #1 |
53. Pharma recruiters target cheerleaders on college campuses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norrin Radd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 01:18 AM Response to Reply #1 |
54. Yep. I used to special order books for a bookstore. There was this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
2. do you really need half-nude girls to market reefer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 03:32 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. I agree with you. I don't think people would give a shit if Grandma and Grampa Moses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capitalocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 03:48 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I'd be more likely to buy it if a scruffy old hippie was selling it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 04:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Ladies and Gentlemen....Willie Nelson, for "Golden Bud!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 04:37 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. yeah, I was thinking "cheap beer commercial gimmick", too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
14. Jesus. Just fucking legalize it, already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:11 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. And then TAX it. Our financial woes would be solved in no time. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 06:15 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. No shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Locrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Nov-28-11 07:30 PM Response to Original message |
39. please...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 01:37 AM Response to Original message |
55. meh. people get so worked up about stuff like this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jtuck004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
57. So SEX is a gateway drug? Uh oh. /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Irishonly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
73. This article is pure spin.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
court jester (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 03:53 PM Response to Reply #73 |
94. The Feds hold a patent on the use of "Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NashVegas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 12:00 PM Response to Original message |
74. This Is Specifically What I've Been Writing About - No One Wants To Hear It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 12:10 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. Cannabis should still be legalized for both medicinal and recreational use. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 06:46 PM Response to Reply #74 |
111. And how the fuck would that be worse than what we have now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-29-11 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
82. Weed and hot girls...like High Times magazine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-30-11 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
125. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC