Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You gotta dance with the one that 'brung ya' (A parable)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 10:47 PM
Original message
You gotta dance with the one that 'brung ya' (A parable)
and Obama's been ignoring Naomi Klein while chatting up Ann Coulter at the Sadie Hawkins. Trying to impress Ann, he publicly mocks and berates his date. Naomi leaves out of disgust, but Obama isn't worried since he's got Ann. He NEEDS Ann. And he believes that Naomi will come back to him no matter what - she's got no place else to go. Only problem with the plan is, Ann's already got someone. Even if she didn't, she wouldn't give him the time of day anyway - he's not her type. Still, Obama believes that he has what she wants and needs. Even if Obama does have what she's looking for, she doesn't want it from HIM. She's only using him for free drinks. She's making fun of him while he's buying. Where does that leave our hero when the 'ugly lights' come on? What's he gonna do when when Naomi doesn't take his calls? What if Naomi is so disenchanted that she decides to remain single while she figures things out? She has to put her own needs and well being over that of some guy that clearly doesn't give a shit about her in the first place and was only taking advantage of her.

Now our protagonist is on the shoe sole express....
He's quick to blame his date for leaving him, but in reality he has no one but himself to blame for his predicament.


**Disclaimer: The characters used in this story are fictitious and any similarities to any person living or dead is purely coincidental.**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dumb fucking post..nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Wah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. slight twist
Sad thing is that as much as you like to think Naomi brought him, the people who brought him as the really fickle Independent voters, the ones that consider themselves to be better than Naomi and Ann. There were also the Minority voters, the Latinas, but we all know if he courted them, certain people would day he is selling out "white Middle class" girls, especially when some of the Union types hate hispanics only slightly less than the KKK, because uncle Lou Dobbs told them to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. meh what bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Backatcha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think you mean Naomi Wolf. Naomi Klein is a true progressive, Naomi Wolf writes self serving lies
People have been confusing the two of them since that silly guardian article came out.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. No, I meant Klein. Klein is the 'Left'. Coulter is the 'Right'.
I'll admit when the brouhaha over Wolf's article first appeared, my kneejerk reaction was "I'll tker her word over yours any day" - until I realized it was the wrong Naomi. Luckily I had not posted before my moment of clarity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-29-11 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. The election upcoming ain't about Obama and his dates,
Edited on Tue Nov-29-11 11:14 PM by FrenchieCat
but I guess some folks don't quite get that.

You can think that your parable meant something profound...
but Obama ain't telephoned Naomi Klein/Wolf
nor bought Ann Coulter's a drink....
so the whole parable of yours is
based on a fantasy that is far from the truth.....


The more realistic parable I can come up with is Obama gets married
after he gets a brand new job. Then his new wife finds out
that instead of spending all of his money on her,
he's gonna have to pay some bills too, and there may not
be that much left for her "wants". She gets pissed and
threatened divorce. He tries to explain the reality of life
to her, that he will have to work at this job for a while,
then get a better job, and perhaps sooner than later, she will
get most of those things that she wants. She tells him to go to hell,
and that she's ready to move out and go live in her car instead of
putting up with him and his "bills". He suggests that maybe if she
gets a job too, she won't have to wait as long. She tells him that
work was marrying him....and that's about as much work as she feels
she deserves to have to do.

Moral of the story: Never marry a man for his Job and think you deserve
anything more than what you will earn in the long haul of being his wife
in good times and in bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-30-11 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You're right - it's a referendum on his policies and he's on the wrong side of things.
Hence 2010 and OWS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC