Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tunisia and three eras of transition from non-democratic to democratic political systems: 1943-1964,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-23-11 08:58 AM
Original message
Tunisia and three eras of transition from non-democratic to democratic political systems: 1943-1964,
1828-1926, and the 1970s and 1980s.

http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=234524

In 1991, right after the collapse of the Communist bloc, Samuel Huntington, the late professor of Harvard University, wrote a book titled “The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century”. This oft-cited study analyzed the transition of some 35 countries, mainly in Asia and Latin America, from non-democratic to democratic political systems during the 1970s and 1980s. The other “waves” occurred from 1828-1926 and 1943-1964. They have all failed to “rock” the Arab Middle East.

Following the 9/11 attacks on Washington and New York, former U.S. president George W. Bush promised what many commentators dubbed at the time as the “fourth wave” which implied spreading democracy in the “last stronghold of world tyranny” — the Middle East. The U.S. military intervention was a complete disaster in every single aspect. It was a disaster to the cause of democracy in the Arab world, it destroyed the credibility of the U.S. as champion of human rights, and it harmed its interests and fed the cause of extremism in the Islamic world. Soon thereafter Bush found himself in a position where he had not only to leave governments heed the call for democracy at their own pace; but had also to support the very tyranny he claimed to be fighting.

If Arab elites were not committed to democracy, one should truly wonder how much commitment was there among the Portuguese or the Spanish elites during the transition to democracy in these two countries in the mid 1970s. In addition, neither homogeneity nor GDP could explain why poor and heterogeneous India has become the world biggest democracy. Last but not least, the success of some Muslim countries, such as Turkey, Indonesia and Malaysia, to establish democratic institutions has undermined the argument that Islam is a hindrance to democracy.

Unlike Iraq, Tunisia's democracy is home-grown.
However, there seems to be attempts by some western powers to abort and cancel what has resulted from this unique popular uprising, fearing that it may have a domino effect throughout the region. Our hope is that the men and women of Tunisia who made this historic victory possible will not allow that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC