Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jerry Brown orders California agencies to halt new car purchases

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 04:04 PM
Original message
Jerry Brown orders California agencies to halt new car purchases
The governor also wants vehicles that are not 'essential' for state business to be sold. He says the action is needed at a time when California faces a $25.4-billion budget shortfall.

Reporting from Sacramento — Gov. Jerry Brown on Friday ordered government agencies to halt new car purchases and sell automobiles that are not "essential" for state business as he launched an effort to cut the number of state-owned passenger vehicles.

The governor said the state needs to reduce spending at a time when it is facing a $25.4-billion budget shortfall.

"There is a lot of wasteful spending on cars that aren't even driven," Brown said in a statement. "And we can't afford to spend taxpayer money on new cars while California faces such a massive deficit."

Brown, who uses his state-owned 2008 Pontiac for work, wants to make a 50% cut in the 11,000 passenger cars and light trucks used mostly by bureaucrats. The state owns 50,000 cars, trucks, vans, buses, boats and aircraft, said Elizabeth Ashford, a spokeswoman for the governor.

Read more: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-state-cars-20110129,0,1929180.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Go Jerry, Arnie is a hard act to clean up after, but you seem to be doing ok...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. if you call balancing the budget on the backs of the poor, sick, and needy "ok...."
Edited on Sat Jan-29-11 04:17 PM by mike_c
Draconian cuts to higher education, social services for the ill and for children, jobs programs for the poor. And Jerry is going to ask permission via ballot initiative to raise additional revenue in a special election during June, which will undoubtedly fail and cause the cuts to double-- yet Governor Brown makes no demands for wealthy individuals or corporations to pay their fair share. While sufficient wealth exists within this state, it is unconscionable to abandon the poor, sick, and needy in order to avoid burdening the wealthy even a little bit.

I think it's refreshing that Brown is being honest about the magnitude of California's budget problems, and that he's willing to confront the issue directly. But it's political patronage as usual when he decided to let the poorest Californians suffer the most from his draconian cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. How do you feel about state pensions?
Being you are in CA, would be interested in your viewpoint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. well, I've been working for years in anticipation of receiving one...
Edited on Sat Jan-29-11 07:16 PM by mike_c
...so my feelings could generally be described as "Favorable? Hell yeah!" I'm faculty at the California State University so my pension, like many California state employees, is a defined benefit plan funded by joint employee/employer donations and administered by CalPERS. My impression is that PERS is fiscally responsible and solvent-- it's the largest public employee pension fund in the world, if I recall correctly.

In general though, I believe that all workers deserve to know that when they grow old or become disabled, either their employer or the state will provide for their care and a retirement income. I'd be quite reluctant to spend my working years in service to an employer whom I knew would abandon me as soon as they'd squeezed the last drops of effort from my body and soul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You might want to take another look at CalPERS
It is getting wobbly, mostly dues to bad real estate deals. It was also the subject to raids by governors from both parties until and initiative put a stop to it.

It is the one pension I am not counting on when I finally hang it up, which may come sooner than I planned with the recent cuts Brown has proposed, its CalPERS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Actually they figured out if you all retire too early, it will cost the state millions
because of the furloughs, state workers have been accruing more vacation/leave time, leave that is payable to each employee upon separation. and paying accrued vacation is not a state law requirement, but a national one.

so now the state is worried too many employees will retire.

interesting, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I declined to pursue tenure so technically I can be dropped at the end of any semester
I do not expect to lose my position but it is going to be hard times in higher education here in CA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wish this guy won the presidency n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peregrine Took Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's 25 years ahead of everyone else...always has been.
Good methods can save tons of money in terms of government procurement.

Commodities and equipment purchases can realize real savings by doing so but the big money is in contracts and real estate leases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Governor Brown needs to demand the wealthy individuals & corporations pay their way not to
copy Obama's tax cuts to the million/billionaires strategy. Jerry brown are you listening!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Jerry is doing what he can, as he said he'd do
Anyone griping about it too loudly does not understand California politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. He is much more constrained this time around
Recent initiatives and even the approach he took to address Prop 13 and Prop 4 have any governor in a corner. Right now he is pulling back on state support which will force localities to raise taxes. Some will go for it, some will not. It will require votes at every step.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-30-11 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. It's just so nice to have an adult in office
And not a movie star who hires fiscal magicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
browntyphoon Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-29-11 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Good. They can sell off old ones to cover new ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC