Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DU a poll: Should workers be able to refuse to join a workplace union?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:23 PM
Original message
DU a poll: Should workers be able to refuse to join a workplace union?
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 12:27 PM by Omaha Steve

Please help workers in Ohio by keeping unions strong there.

Please vote NO here: http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2011/02/04/hotissue_04.html

Currently YES has 80%

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Done !!! - K & R !!!
Voted NO

Comment: Only if the Union gets to refuse them the pay raises and benefits it bargains for.

:shrug:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. My wife use to work with "parasites"
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 12:30 PM by KansDem
That's what we call those workers who refuse to join the union but enjoy the benefits the union provides.

She is in the KNEA and works at a college here in Kansas. Two of her colleagues refused to join the KNEA citing they didn't like unions. But when the union negotiated raises and other benefits with the administration, her two colleagues got the same package as the KNEAers.

They became known as "the parasites" in our household...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, as long as they do NOT receive any of the union negotiated benefits.
Only seems fair, if you didn't bargain for it you don't get it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not always the case...
See my post no. 2...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
du_da Donating Member (239 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. That seem fair
Let each individual in that situation negotiate their own salary and benefit package. Is it possible though for a individual to do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. I negotiate mine... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Same here. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:59 PM
Original message
This should be the ONLY tiered system there is, union and non-union.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
41. Agreed. I recently refused, and I understand that. My choice. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Force them to join the union? How is that fair?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. How is it fair that they benefit from union negotiations if they aren't union themselves?
Join the union, reap union benes, don't join the union, don't get union benes..seems simple to me..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demstud Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. How would a partially unionized workplace work?
If you're working someplace with a union you're going to benefit from their actions, so you should pay the dues and be a member.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. The Union Difference

http://www.aflcio.org/joinaunion/why/uniondifference/index.cfm

The Union Difference
Home > Join A Union > Why You Need a Union > The Union Difference

Get the facts on why

* Collective Bargaining Raises Wages—Especially for Women and People of Color
* Nonunion Worker Pay Is Significantly Lower in Nearly All Occupational Groups
* Unions Workers Have Better Health Care and Pensions
* Workers’ Incomes Are Lower in States Where Workers Don’t Have Union Rights
* Unions Are Good for Business, Productivity, and the Economy
* Unions Help Bring Low-Wage Workers Out of Poverty
* Unions Help Bring Workers Into the Middle Class

Learn more about

* Unions and Professional Workers
* Union Membership by State
* Union Membership by Occupation
* Trends in Union Membership

More

* Download a one-page flier of the “Union Advantage by the Numbers.”
* How much difference does a union make? Download a quiz and find out!
* Unions 101, a one-page “crash course” on unions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. How is it fair is they are protected and have benefits
guaranteed by a contract that came into being by the workers who have joined together and pay dues. In fact these scabs steal money and benefits right out of my pocket because their non membership hurts us at the bargaining table. -HOW IS THAT FAIR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. "...by the workers who have joined together and pay dues"
"Pay dues"

My wife belongs to the KNEA and pays dues. Two of her colleagues didn't, claiming to dislike unions.

They received the same raises and benefits the union negotiated with the school's administrations, yet they didn't pay dues!

My wife pays about $40 a month for ten months each year to the union. That means, not only did "the parasites" get what the union members got, they got an additional $400 a year!!! :grr:

I don't know about anyone else, but I could use an additional $400 a year!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Texas is a "Right to Work" state
That's the way it is here. I pay nearly $800.00 in dues and $350 to COPE. It is well worth it. But those who reap the goods that we gain for all are really stupid if they think they are saving money. My brother-in-law makes 2 bucks more than we do because they have nearly %100 membership. That comes to about $4000.00 a year. Thanks for that parasitic scabs!

Oh and I would gladly pay $1000.00 annual dues for that kind of increase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. they can go work someplace else if they don't want to join the union. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Because of federal law...

Because of federal law, all workers are covered by the contract and MUST get all the benefits even if they don't join the union.

It is state right to work laws that let them do this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. I voted YES
I just don't see why a worker shouldn't have the right to refuse to join a union..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
34. if they don't like the union, they should work at a NON-UNION shop then....
unless they just like to reap the benefits of the union shop without any personal responsibility.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NaturalHigh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
49. Me too.
I'm very pro-union, but I strongly disagree with forcing someone to join.

Several years ago when Oklahoma had a right-to-work vote, I voted yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
svsuman23 Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. while I'm pro union, shouldn't people have the right to make their own decision?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
35. yes, they can decide to work in a non-union shop
problem solved!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. No. I believe in closed shops. Open shops lose much
of their negotiating ability. As a matter of fact, if I were Queen, I would make a proclamation that all workers with a rank that is below an executive officer be required by law to belong to a union or trade guild or professional association that functions like a union and that is independent of the company or corporation they work for. The only exception would be cooperatives where the workers are also owners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Wouldn't I t Just Be Easier....
If you were Queen, wouldn't it just be easier to make a proclamation that all employers would treat ALL of their workers with dignity and respect, and that all employers would provide ALL of their workers with a living wage that was fair?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
43. Yes, but I might not be Queen at a future date so
I need to leave a legacy so that employers will find it harder to exploit workers when I'm not around to protect their rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Of course they should. Why the hell would I vote no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. "Union limit is back on GOP radar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. No one can "force" someone to do what they don't want to do.
It's that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I agree,but didnt US government just force people to buy health insurnce from private firms in 2014?
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 12:59 PM by stockholmer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
44. So few people understand labor law, here is the correct answer


http://www.nrtw.org/rtws.htm

A Right to Work law secures the right of employees to decide for themselves whether or not to join or financially support a union. However, employees who work in the railway or airline industries are not protected by a Right to Work law, and employees who work on a federal enclave may not be.

Check the map at the link.

Click on a Right to Work state below to read that state's Right to Work law.

NOTE: State laws are in a constant state of flux. Before relying on the text of any state Right to Work statute, you should check the most recent edition of your state laws.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. here in Sweden, it's optional, but 80% of our workforce is unionized, the US is only 12%, 7% private
Also, you get no union support or benefits if you do not join, however our basic labour laws are loads better than the USA, so even the non-union workers have more protections than even a unionized American worker, in most cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Of course the Swedes get it right...
social democracy wins every time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
20. Workers SHOULD Be Able Not To Join A Union
...but they should be required to pay dues in any case.

Most of that money goes toward collective bargaining of wages, benefits, work rules, and workplace safety.

BTW, there's nothing in union contracts that stops an individual from negotiating a deal better than the union contract. The contract is just a floor for wages and benefits.

: )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. My union lets you refuse but you must still pay dues
That's because the union includes the non-union workers in negotiated benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #23
46. fair share dues
which aren't much less than full share dues (maybe $5?). before i retired, i worked for the state, full share union member, but my manager never was, even when he was not a manager. never could figure out why either (he didn't share his political idealogy). he was/is a skinflint though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. Workers already have that right. They can pay a "service fee" without joining the union.

There are no federal or state laws requiring workers to become members of any labor organization.

But, workers who receive wage and other benefits negotiated by a labor organization must pay a service fee to cover bargaining and other union costs associated with obtaining and enforcing those collective bargaining agreements. Most workers don't like "free loaders".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. ONLY because your state has a fair share law

Most right to work for less states don't have that option. Unless your in a right to work state, you must join in closed shop states!

I'm headed out with Marta. I'll be back later this afternoon.

OS

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. ONLY because your state has a fair share law


Most right to work for less states don't have that option.

I'm headed out with Marta. I'll be back later this afternoon.

OS

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleTouch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
27. Of course they should be able to refuse.
What happened to the right of individual choice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. then they can refuse to join a union at a non-union shop.
simple, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleTouch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Sure. I don't see a problem with that either. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamtechus Donating Member (868 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
28. Research the subject carefully before making up your mind on this
Workers in RTW states make approx $5000 per year less than those in free-bargaining states.

Infant mortality is higher in RTW states than in non-rtw states.

21% fewer people are covered by health insurance in RTW states.

And on and on. Check it out before you end up voting against your best interests like so many right-wingers do.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
38. I thought they could. Maybe they can sometimes, in some states, or with some unions?
I really don't know if they should or should not be allowed to. I don't know enough about it. I can see valid reasons for both sides of that question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
39. Yes they should be able to refuse to join a union.
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 03:22 PM by county worker
But if they want the benefits that the union workers negotiate for they have to pay the union dues even though they are not in the union. That is the way it is were I work. I am in the SEIU but no one is forced to join, all have to pay the dues because all win the benefits when there is a negotiation.

We are always giving up something to keep layoffs to a minimum and as a non union member we are giving up things for non union member's benefit too. We are giving up raises, COLAS and now we are going to give the FICA reductions back to the county to lower the cost of retirement contributions the county has to make. We give up money for the benefit of everyone, so everyone should pay to support the union costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
40. done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
42. Yes, of course
individual rights and all.

If unions don't like that, they can go and work for a company who also doesn't believe in individual rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. and if they refuse to join,
they can go work somewhere without a union. I think everyone agrees on that point; nobody should be compelled to work anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
45. It's not simple
If someone doesn't want to join a union, how is it practical to deny them any SAFETY benefits won by union negotiation? They certainly don't have a right to profit from this work without paying for it.

I can just see the new electrician...
"Well, we all need our safety suits, helmets, and fiberglass ladders. The non-union guy gets the polyester jacket and the aluminum ladder."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
47. We flipped the #'s!

80% yes is now 34% Yes 66% No

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC