|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Omaha Steve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:23 PM Original message |
DU a poll: Should workers be able to refuse to join a workplace union? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:29 PM Response to Original message |
1. Done !!! - K & R !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
2. My wife use to work with "parasites" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yes, as long as they do NOT receive any of the union negotiated benefits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:31 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Not always the case... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
du_da (239 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:36 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. That seem fair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProdigalJunkMail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:41 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. I negotiate mine... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:45 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Same here. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:59 PM Original message |
This should be the ONLY tiered system there is, union and non-union. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 03:25 PM Response to Reply #3 |
41. Agreed. I recently refused, and I understand that. My choice. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansasVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
5. Force them to join the union? How is that fair? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:34 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. How is it fair that they benefit from union negotiations if they aren't union themselves? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demstud (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. How would a partially unionized workplace work? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Omaha Steve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. The Union Difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasProgresive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
16. How is it fair is they are protected and have benefits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 01:09 PM Response to Reply #16 |
29. "...by the workers who have joined together and pay dues" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasProgresive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 02:54 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. Texas is a "Right to Work" state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 03:02 PM Response to Reply #5 |
33. they can go work someplace else if they don't want to join the union. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Omaha Steve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
7. Because of federal law... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
9. I voted YES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 03:06 PM Response to Reply #9 |
34. if they don't like the union, they should work at a NON-UNION shop then.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NaturalHigh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-05-11 03:21 AM Response to Reply #9 |
49. Me too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
svsuman23 (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
10. while I'm pro union, shouldn't people have the right to make their own decision? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 03:08 PM Response to Reply #10 |
35. yes, they can decide to work in a non-union shop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
11. No. I believe in closed shops. Open shops lose much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zorahopkins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:44 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Wouldn't I t Just Be Easier.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 04:57 PM Response to Reply #18 |
43. Yes, but I might not be Queen at a future date so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
12. Of course they should. Why the hell would I vote no? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Omaha Steve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:47 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. "Union limit is back on GOP radar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. No one can "force" someone to do what they don't want to do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stockholmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. I agree,but didnt US government just force people to buy health insurnce from private firms in 2014? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Omaha Steve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:21 PM Response to Reply #24 |
44. So few people understand labor law, here is the correct answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stockholmer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
17. here in Sweden, it's optional, but 80% of our workforce is unionized, the US is only 12%, 7% private |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:46 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Of course the Swedes get it right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
20. Workers SHOULD Be Able Not To Join A Union |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Other (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
23. My union lets you refuse but you must still pay dues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:41 PM Response to Reply #23 |
46. fair share dues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
25. Workers already have that right. They can pay a "service fee" without joining the union. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Omaha Steve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 01:12 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. ONLY because your state has a fair share law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Omaha Steve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 01:12 PM Response to Reply #25 |
31. ONLY because your state has a fair share law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InvisibleTouch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
27. Of course they should be able to refuse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 03:10 PM Response to Reply #27 |
36. then they can refuse to join a union at a non-union shop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InvisibleTouch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 03:15 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Sure. I don't see a problem with that either. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamtechus (868 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
28. Research the subject carefully before making up your mind on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
38. I thought they could. Maybe they can sometimes, in some states, or with some unions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
county worker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
39. Yes they should be able to refuse to join a union. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
40. done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kctim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
42. Yes, of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 07:42 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. and if they refuse to join, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saras (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
45. It's not simple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Omaha Steve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-04-11 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
47. We flipped the #'s! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC