Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Just curious

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:22 PM
Original message
Just curious
While walking home today I thought about this question. Are there any Companies or Corporations that people really trust or would honestly endorse anymore? If you had to list your top three in the United States who would you chose? Am I cynical that I can't think of just one?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ben & Jerry's.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Didn't they get bought out by someone else?
If they did not, I'd vote for them too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Oh, no!
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. They were bought-out by Unilever. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
29. They did; a big part of the sales contract required buyer to maintain Socially Responsible policies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #29
45. Good to know that the founders had some stipulations
For the new owners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not cynical, Capitalsim is unmitigated evil.

And it doesn't even work, which is why we have recurrent economic meltdowns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. How are you defining capitalism?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
36. A method of production...
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 04:26 PM by blindpig
where one class(capitalist) controls the means of production and the other class(workers) must work for them for wages. What is unique about capitalism is that in previous methods of production most workers did have control of of their means of production, be that farmland and implements, a craftsman's tools, etc. In this system the worker is entirely dependent upon the owning class for their sustenance. Even in feudalism there was a social contract, in capitalism there is none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. That's a bad definition, and relies on false assumptions.
Every previous and future method of production has or had a ruling and servant class. Capitalism is the only one I know of where a worker can control their own production and can keep the results of their production if they know how or want to. The fact that the majority of people choose to work for someone else has nothing to do with capitalism.

As for feudalism, as a former medieval historian I can assure you there was nothing close to a social contract, nor anything resembling freedom within the system. You were born into a system, you were forbidden to ever leave, and whatever your lord told you he wanted of your labors, you owed him, unless you could form an army and defeat his army. That system gave way when capitalism began to emerge, and people were free to sell their labor where they wanted, and to whom they wanted. The freedom to sell it also meant people had to be able to buy it, but at least it was only the labor, and not the whole person and every moment of their time and and every shred of their freedom, who was bought and sold, as in feudalism. Feudalism was slavery.

What you are complaining about isn't capitalism, it's grand-scale feudalism that has crept into the system because our government refuses to provide the regulations necessary for capitalism. Capitalism is an artificial construct requiring constant regulation by the society using it. When that regulation is present, it's the most free and fair system in existence. When society surrenders that control and regulation, the result is feudalism. You just think that's capitalism because the overlord wannabees convinced you that it was. They told the people that to have "true" capitalism the market had to be "free" and unregulated, so that they could take control away from the people, and too many people believed that. But that was the devil, convincing people that the flames were really icewater. Capitalism is defined by regulation, and when that regulation is lost, you have the feudalism that is slowly emerging now.

I blame Reagan. First, he tore down the protections we'd built over the last century to protect capitalism. Second, he cut education spending so much that people don't know a damn thing about economics these days except what they learn from people trying to sell crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. People choose to work for Capitalists?

What choice do they have when the capitalists own the means of production? A generalization of course but generally true. If people keep the results of their labor then where do profits come from?

Capitalism is not a static thing, it is a historical development. To pick a moment in it's development and say, "This is what capitalism is supposed to be." is akin to pointing to Australopithecus afarensis and saying that is what humans should be. The method of capitalism, the ceaseless accumulation, precludes the static, as the excess capital seeks new venues to reproduce itself in. Thus we have bubbles and 'market corrections', and so finance capitalism inevitably come to the fore as the repository of excess capital that cannot find a profitable venue elsewhere.

Yours is a fine libertarian narrative, an ahistorical excuse for ruling class dominance. People were 'free to sell their labor' only after they had been dispossessed of their land and had no other means of sustenance. Surely you are familiar with the Enclosure Acts and similar laws from the Continent.

Regulation is a mirage, a temporary expedient at best. Witness the fate of the New Deal. As long as Capital has the means it will seek to maximize profit and control of government is just one means of realizing that goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. to be fair, your way didn't work at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. History ain't over yet bucko. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm almost afraid to answer this
because if I think of any companies, someone might point out something I didn't know about them :(

The only one I can think of is Credo, who apparently supports a lot of progressive causes.

Then again, why am I not a customer of theirs? No idea! :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I tried to be their customer but ATT held my LD hostage
and I finally gave up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. I like Costco.
I know they're not perfect, but they're close.

My dear AsahinaKimi!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. Same here, they treat their employees well.
And I am personally pretty happy with Publix grocery store as they are employee-held, although no doubt they have issues being based in a right-to-work state. Our son has worked for them since he was 14, we know a number of employees and management and really have only good things to say about them and how they treat their employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Howler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yep.
Dharma trading co.
They are environmentally and socially conscious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Off the top of my head: Costco, Barnes and Noble, Woodman's grocery stores.
I think any operation that supports unions, fair wages, and decent charitable and political giving would be included. I'm sure if I gave it a few minutes of thought I'd come up with more. I also tend to like companies like LL Bean which are all American made products even if their contributions are middling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Trust for what? To provide a product? Sure, plenty. To care about anything other than money?
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 03:37 PM by jobycom
Of course not. The only purpose of a business is business. The only purpose is to make money. That's why we need a strong government to regulate business, to protect people from their predatory tendencies and to protect the economy from the destructive competition that leads to monopolies and feudalism.

So there's nothing to trust or not trust about businesses. They exist for a purpose, and as long as the nation uses that purpose properly, things are beautiful. When the government fails to regulate them, then government is to blame. Blaming corporations to me is like blaming water for people drowning in it. Water is necessary and can be used for good, but if you don't pay attention to it, it will eventually destroy you, not because it's bad, but just because it is.

As Churchill very well might have said, capitalism is the worst economic system ever devised, except for all the other ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. Apple. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. Homer Laughlin China Co.
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 03:52 PM by Kurovski
"...By 2002, ownership of the company was shared by third, fourth and fifth generation members of the Wells and Aaron families and others. Many of the shareholders were scattered throughout the country and had little involvement with the business. In an effort to consolidate resources and provide improved direction for the company, Joe Wells III, together with his sisters, Jean Wicks and Elizabeth McIlvain, purchased the interests of the other stockholders. In June, 2002, Joe Wells III was elected president and chief executive officer.

Since the re-organization, the company has experienced continued growth and is poised to move forward with the Wells Family’s pledge to continue producing quality, American-made china and provide jobs for potters of the Ohio Valley."

http://www.hlchina.com/company.htm



I know that they have become quite huge, and they use GMO, but General Mills still treats employees extremely well, and they do share the wealth.
( I think they also own that restaurant, Olive Pit, whatever) :)

Heinz is still good, I believe.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. HL is still family owned? That's wonderful! That's great stuff.
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 04:07 PM by blondeatlast
Or, rather, that's wonderful because they aren't going the Wal-Mart family adcendency way.

And, it's great stuff anyway; I started adding to my late mom's collection a few years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. They also make least toxic glazes. No lead, for one.
I'll buy any piece I find on clearance or garage sales.

I love to mix up the colors.

It's a good American company that ships all over the world. I think it's very popular in France.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. Mostly local/regional: Powell's Books, New Seasons Groceries, Rudy's Barber Shops...
... it's hard to come up with larger companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. I was contemplating that. I bet none of us will name a transnational corporation.
I was thinking about the choices I listed and none of them are on the same global scale as say Microsoft, GE, Halliburton, Kraft etc.

I wonder if that's when things go so wrong - the company becomes too big to be ethical?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. Maybe if you started a company, you would expect people to
trust it?

Why should they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. Cabot Cooperative (cheese) (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. CREDO ("Working Assets")
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 03:44 PM by Tesha
There -- that's my three.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Maybe things have changed, but...
... it was hard to stay with them. We had them for five or six years, back in the '90s. Eventually, I realized that I could give far more to charity if I went with a cheaper provider, and gave the difference in savings to good causes. There may be other reasons to go with them, but we're just about to get rid of our land line, so...

Anyway, blah, blah, blah.

Cheers! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. None from me.
Corporations are the apotheosis of power hierarchies, and so by definition are anti-human. The best we can say about the best of them is that they don't ruin their employees' or customers' lives completely.

Corporations are a major part of the problems of the planet. We may have to live with them, but we don't have to like them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. Costco and Progressive Insurance I like
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalLoner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. I've heard Wegman's treats their employees well. Maybe them? Dunno. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. wegmans rocks and is always in the top 5 best companies to work for list. this year they are three.
they were first a few times recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newest Reality Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
25. You can scratch Whole Foods
off the feel-good company list, now.

Many people I know are not so hot on shopping there anymore due to the major blow-job they are giving Monsanto. The impact of that is far-reaching. Plus, when you look into it, other than the labeled organic foods, the "natural" label, (which comprises a significant amount of their offerings) does not amount to much anyway and so, the prices at Whole Foods are not justifiable in that sense.

There are other places to hook-up with quality foods, anyway.

Oh, and I agree that corporations, are, by nature business, profit, bottom-line, a model that I can find no allegiance with and, despite the feeling of being like a Salmon swimming up-stream to mate, it would be nice to see a paradigm shift before we render our species, (and many others) totally extinct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
30. Southwest Airlines, the YMCA, Girl Scouts...
I help establish 501(c)3's (and others) for a living. Many I wouldn't trust as far as I could throw their boards but that isn't the case for all. Chances are, if they are smart, the local bagel deli or taco stand is a "corporation" by definition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. I was just going to say that a local butcher is a great company. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
31. Kroger (UFCW) comes to mind. Also some gov't manufacturing contractors I've worked with
Textron makes the boat my office supports for the Navy; they do a good job.

I guess it depends on what you mean by "trust"; there are corporations I trust to follow the law, make a decent product, and sell it at a fair price. That's all I really expect from a corporation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
32. Define "corporation." The Girl Scouts are a corporation, so is Halliburton.
I've helped some wonderful charitable organizations incorporate under 501(c)3 status and some real slimeballs as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
33. No corporation can be trusted to do the right thing by defnition.
They are legally required to maximize profits before all else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
38. tough to say. i use geico for my insurance for example. the few experiences i've
had with them were positive, so i suppose i "trust" them to provide auto insurance.

then again, there's probably DUers who had a bad experience with them and think they're scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Geico got into politics by firing voice-over actorwho criticised the so-called Tea Party
yet when another actor, the Drill sargeant in geico ad spouted rightwing nuttery in public, they didn't pull his crap ad. For all that's worth.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/21/geico-fires-dc-douglas-vo_n_546038.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
39. Corporation is a word that covers both huge and small organizations.
Both local and multinational. Both public and private. I do not trust any multinational corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
40. "Top Three" misses the point
I can think of a fair number, but they're mostly too small and local to matter to anyone outside my region.

Hardware Sales, Bellingham, WA.
They're an old-fashioned hardware store for people who still do real work. They deserve to be known as well as Wall Drug, but it would ruin them.

Heet Sound Products, Los Angeles, CA.
Makers of the E-Bow for (mostly) electric guitars. I use mine on my acoustic guitar and on my ukulele.

Great Harvest Bread Co., Dillon, MT
They're a franchise, so my experience is biased by my local branch. Great bread, great place to work.

Tillamook Cheese Co, Tillamook OR - oops, they're a farmer-owned coop, so they don't count

Moog Music, Asheville, NC
Robert Moog, the synthesiser guy, got his name back (he lost the rights to it back in the seventies), before he died. They may yet turn corporate, but right now they're still a pretty good company.

I could also name about twenty local farms that have had to incorporate for legal reasons...

No multinationals, of course. I think that by the time they have enough products that they start to buy and sell product lines, that they've lost any commitment to the products being any good any more. So if you can't answer the question "what do they make" (NOT "what do they do"), I think they've lost it. I don't trust 'service' companies of any size, because I think the model is fundamentally flawed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vim876 Donating Member (268 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
42. Yes.
There are private and not-for-profit corporations I trust and would endorse. But public ones? Do you think people are stupid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC