Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Clinton: We Can't Legalize Drugs Because 'There Is Just Too Much Money in It'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 03:25 AM
Original message
Hillary Clinton: We Can't Legalize Drugs Because 'There Is Just Too Much Money in It'
Hillary Clinton: We Can't Legalize Drugs Because 'There Is Just Too Much Money in It'


Last week, while visiting Mexico, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was interviewed by Denise Maerker of Televisa, who asked her opinion of proposals to address black-market violence by repealing drug prohibition. Clinton's response illustrates not only the intellectual bankruptcy of the prohibitionist position but the economic ignorance of a woman who would be president (emphasis added):

Maerker: In Mexico, there are those who propose not keeping going with this battle and legalize drug trafficking and consumption. What is your opinion?

Clinton: I don't think that will work. I mean, I hear the same debate. I hear it in my country. It is not likely to work. There is just too much money in it, and I don't think that—you can legalize small amounts for possession, but those who are making so much money selling, they have to be stopped.

Clinton evidently does not understand that there is so much money to be made by selling illegal drugs precisely because they are illegal.


http://reason.com/blog/2011/02/07/hillary-clinton-we-cant-legali


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Translation from Bullshit
"we know that if we did legalize it, the same Corporations that we refuse to control would be all over it, selling Lemon flavored cocaine aimed at preschoolers. Therefore, we will not even try to l;egalize it, as we would have to switch from attacking those who are easy prey (minorities and poor white trash) to the people who will either sign the checks to keep us alive, or our death warrants."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Too much money is Private Prisons
DEA budget, ATF budget and pharmaceutical profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Not to mention the fact that many of our shady overseas 'allies'
who have a long, cozy relationship with the CIA would lose their biggest revenue stream...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-11 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
30. What a steaming pile of diarrhetic bullshit this woman is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hillary Has Never Had an Intellectual Leg to Stand On
for all her education and experience has been Corporate, not human.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timtom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Precisely what I've always thought. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It sure sounds that way,,,,, But who is making all that money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. The Cartels
in Mexico and the ME. A portion of that money gets funneled through to the C.I.A. for under-the-radar operations that you and I aren't supposed to know about.
The prison industry -- remember, more and more states are going towards for-profit (privatization) prison systems.
The pharmaceutical companies -- millions of people deny themselves the relief that canibus can offer them for a variety of ailments because of the illegal status and lack of availability unless they live in a MM state.

Those are off the top of my head. I know there's more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. ugh... k&r, nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. Clinton towing the status quo BS line... how un-surprising.
I wonder if she knows how stupid she sounds when she talks rot like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
8. Did all these pro-prohibition politicians fail 20th Century American History?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. Too much money in...what? The war on drugs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. I took it to mean that the drug lords make to much money to be stopped...
Edited on Tue Feb-08-11 08:22 AM by Little Star
jmho
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. And what an embarrassing admission that would be, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. Just like Anheuser Busch is uncontrollable.
See alchohol was illegal, highly priced, and thus very lucrative for organized crime.

After we legalized it, things went to hell. The Anheuser Busch cartel routinely buys politicians, manipulates beer prices higher, and kills rivals in running gang wars.

Oh wait none of that happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-11 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
34. I think one could argue that two of those three things HAVE happened.
The Anheuser Busch cartel routinely buys politicians, manipulates beer prices higher, and kills rivals in running gang wars.


I'd note that all three happened under prohibition. Add campaign finance laws and regulation to legalization and all three would disappear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
14. Too big to fail! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
15. Legalize pot, tax it and the deficit goes away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. Well no. Our deficit is a magnitude larger than that.
Alchohol sales are roughly $116 bil a year, tobacco is a $20 bil a year. Lets say someday pot is $200B industry. Lets also say you tax it at 25%. That's $50B a year. Our deficit is $1500B a year.

Still it can't hurt but it does illustrate how deep our deficit is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. The most ignorant statement I have ever heard uttered by
Hillary Clinton. Apparently she is equal parts stupid and shill. Hey Hillary, how'd we stop those bootleggers making so much money? Yeah, we removed the market via legalization.
Hill is officially a stooge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
18. What if Bill got caught not inhalin' and thrown into the slammer?
It might've changed a thing or two. Like, no governorship or presidency. She'd also be singing a different tune today, I suppose. Especially when Dubya and Dick manage to seize the highest offices with DUIs on both their records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurks Often Donating Member (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
19. Is Hillary speaking for herself or she communicating the
Administration's position on the legalization of drugs? In theory, as Secretary of State, she is stating the Administration's position on legalization.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobinA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-11 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #19
31. Party Line
Clinton is not this dumb. She's saying what she has to say, badly, because she's a member of the administration. I have no idea what she really believes, but she's not, as Secretary of State, going to come out in favor of legalization. Politics doesn't work that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-11 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. sigh
If she believed in drug legalization, she sure could have done something about it back when she and bill ran the show..why do people think she is some super liberal kept in obama's dungeon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
20. Thick as a brick.
Perhaps intentionally so, since her argument is also incoherent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
21. Hillary channels Palin. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
24. Hey, that sounds like the same reason we can't have a public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conspirator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. She means: there is too much money for the status quo and the CIA to give up
the monopoly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yeah, you can't take away the CIAs' revenues... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
27. Correct, and not just for the drug lords!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-11 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
28. My new winner
for "Dumbest Prohibition Supporting Line".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReggieVeggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-11 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
29. we know Mrs. Clinton isn't dumb, so that leaves 2 possibilities...
either she was tired and wasn't thinking clearly about the question or her answer, or she admitted to the establishment take on illicit drugs: it's a moneymaker for certain sectors of our own government and legalization would put too many people out of work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-11 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
32. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-11 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
35. 'Error: you can only recommend threads which were started in the past 24 hours'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC