Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Serious Bad News from Patreaus in Afghanistan...expect a bloody Summer.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 12:39 PM
Original message
Serious Bad News from Patreaus in Afghanistan...expect a bloody Summer.


"General David Petraeus, the top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan, says he is excepting a brutal fight in the spring when Taliban insurgents try to return from their winter safe havens to areas already cleared by the international forces.

"When you have 110,000 more of us than we had a year ago, we're obviously in many, many more places," he said in an interview with NATO TV. "We have taken away areas that matter to the Taliban and they have to fight back."

But he doesn't see more violence as mission failure.

"When you're on the offensive... the insurgents have to fight back and violence goes up, it's a necessary part of any counter-insurgency."

Last year was the deadliest for American troops in the 10 year war, with 499 service members dying in the line of duty."

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503543_162-20031135-503543.html


Patreaus says he has "110,000 more of us than we had a year ago".
Who are these 110,000 he is talking about?

The Obama Surge of 30,000 troops was in place before last Summer (2010).
As cynical as I am about the US Government, I don't believe they could get away with a secret escalation. Right?

Are these 110.000 Afghan troops ("more of us") that have been "trained & equipped" last year,
and expected to fight for the USA and the corrupt Karzai puppet this Summer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Patreus and his boss have never read Afghan history, or if they did, learned nothing from reading n
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. ..they don't call it the graveyard of empires for nothing..
...as in Vietnam the US thinks that those that preceeded them did it wrong and they can do better...the Brits and the Soviets got their asses handed to them in Afghanistan..at this point as things stand there is no reason to think that the US won't become the third empire to fail there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. I just watched "Charlie Wilson's War" last night. Very interesting!
And the movie closed with these lines, (after the Russian had to leave Afghanistan):

"These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world... and then we fucked up the endgame."

We're still dealing with the blowback from that.

Afghanistan. Where empires go to die!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think it's time for our summer sit in on the WH lawn.
We need to stay until they say they are leaving now. It might take longer than Tunisia and maybe less time than Egypt, but we must stop the bloodshed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hate the price that has to be paid, but the Taliban needs to be put down..
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. We went to Afghanistan to find bin Laden and
Al-qaeda..... Now we are fighting the Taliban??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. No. We went to Afghanistan to prepare to invade Iraq.
bin Laden was simply an excuse, as was invading Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. I am just quoting what I was told by little bush
We stay for the minerals and trying to stop the Chinese from getting them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. And how is that worthy goal to be accomplished?
So far, the United States has spent about nine years and hundreds of billions of dollars on violent solutions. Is there something else that might be tried? Or is this a problem that can only be solved by the application of more violence in a more ruthless manner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Step one, remove the politicians from the military decision-making process..
..step 2) give the military clearly defined objectives, step 3) give them as many troops and as much materiel as they need to get the job done, step 4) get out of their way and let them do their jobs..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Number 1 seems to conflict with number 2, and number 3 is totally political
But it seems that the upshot is that the solution is more violence, more ruthlessly applied. Good luck with that. Say hi to the Soviets when you get to where they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yes the upshot is more violence, more ruthlessly applied.
The time for half-measures has passed. You can't get a little bit pregnant. Either do it right, or don't do it at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. We heard the "more time, more troops, more money" song before.
It was particularly popular in that other lost war in another part of Asia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. When all of that continues to fail what do we do?
Edited on Fri Feb-11-11 01:31 PM by obxhead
You think the USSR did not do that very same process with a much broader set of rules of acceptable torture?

So, when unlimited resources, troop counts, and no political oversight fail what would be the next step?

We can make a choice between 2 options in Afghanistan. We can choose to pull out showing the world we do not have the will to win or we can expend every available asset we can borrow and pull out anyway proving to the world we do not have the ability to win. Personally I would rather keep it a matter of speculation whether we could have won or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polly7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Exactly wth are we in Afghanistan for, seriously? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. When you can not win a war with today's military in over
9 years, it is time to pack it up and come home.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. "We're obviously in many, many more places"
I wonder if those "many, many more places" are as secure as The Man Called Petraeus thinks they are? I also wonder if the "areas already cleared by the international forces" was because of positive action, or because the "Taliban insurgents" had left for their "winter safe havens"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. Petraeus survived the BushCo purge for a reason...
He kissed the neocon's ass 24/7. And it looks like he's still at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. looks like a retread headline of the past 10 years.
And it will be used every spring that we are there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. Memo to Petraeus: You lost. Get out. Get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. k&r with sadness for kid of friend who is there, k&r with sadness for the Afghani people
k&r with anger towards those seeking power and oppressing people, whether they be "little" warlords or Taliban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Thanks for the Rec.
Looks like there are those who don't want a NEWS report from CBS with direct quotes from the Commanding General in Afghanistan to be circulated on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. You are welcome. It is odd, guess Afghanistan is old news or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-12-11 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
24. Afghanistan?....War?
Hello?


Anyone?


Last night On Bill Maher, the panel agreed that there was NO Anti-War movement in the USA anymore.
Looks like they were right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC