Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Decentralizes Wildlife Management in National Parks, Threatening Reagan Protections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 08:01 AM
Original message
Obama Decentralizes Wildlife Management in National Parks, Threatening Reagan Protections
Obama Decentralizes Wildlife Management in National Parks, Threatening Reagan Protections

In proposing to decentralize the management of national forests and endangered species, the Obama administration may undo protections that President Ronald Reagan approved 29 years ago.

A new rule developed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) would give directors of the 155 individual national forests more authority to manage local habitats. Currently, such decision-making is in the hands of officials in Washington, DC, which has been the case since the Reagan administration established this centralized-authority approach in 1982.

Officials with the U.S. Forest Service say the change would move the government away from a one-size-fits-all approach to ecosystem management, pointing out how different national forests in Alaska are from those in Florida.

But environmentalists are wary of expanding the power of local forest supervisors because they doubt whether all of them will have the same regard for wildlife protections.

http://www.allgov.com/Controversies/ViewNews/Obama_Decentralizes_Wildlife_Management_in_National_Parks_Threatening_Reagan_Protections_110215
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't see this as necessarily bad. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdadd Donating Member (950 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I was kind of thinking along those same lines......
Like changing anything Reagan originated,is a bad thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC