Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clarence Thomas speaks....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:13 AM
Original message
Clarence Thomas speaks....
He also lashed out at his critics, without naming them, asserting they “seem bent on undermining” the High Court as an institution. Such criticism, Thomas warned, could erode the ability of American citizens to fend off threats to their way of life.

“You all are going to be, unfortunately, the recipients of the fallout from that – that there’s going to be a day when you need these institutions to be credible and to be fully functioning to protect your liberties,” he said, according to a partial recording of the speech provided to POLITICO by someone who was at the meeting.

“And that’s long after I’m gone, and that could be either a short or a long time, but you’re younger, and it’s still going to be a necessity to protect the liberties that you enjoy now in this country.”



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/50277.html#ixzz1FGb6izLq

Funny, he could be rallying people against him with that sort of talk....

He can't be that irony impaired, could he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. So the mute finally speaks and has basically nothing to say.
how does that saying go? Better be thought the fool than speak and have it confirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. That's pretty hilarious. He thinks WE are ruining the credibility of the court?!?!?!
Guess he doesn't have a bathroom mirror to look into. Otherwise he'd be seeing the problem face-on, every morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chemenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Seems to me that Clarence and A. Scalia
have already done a pretty good job of undermining the Supreme Court as an institution. Those two have done a lot to turn the USSC into a judicial activist body to further conservatist Republican agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. Poor Clarence he is SO YESTERDAY!
He doesn't even realize that the day I needed the institutions was back in December of 2000!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. LOL
Damn I glad I didn't have a mouth full of coffee when I read that. :rofl:
What you wrote being so spot on is what got the reaction out of me that it got
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. It's probably unfair to play baseball with a pudgy 16" softball guy
but, he did step onto the field under his own power (less or more, ya know?).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. See?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Impeace Slappy and Tony the Fixer
ASAFP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chemenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. Self delete
Edited on Mon Feb-28-11 10:25 AM by chemenger
stupid computer glitch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. Still a victim after all these years
have you ever seen somebody feel so sorry for himself for so long?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. You nailed it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. His wife is the same way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. The Right loves playing the victim
I've got a right-wing friend who's white, straight, male, American, married, and Christian and yet when you hear him complain - which is often - you'd think that he was a member of the most oppressed group on the planet. It should be almost laughable, but instead it's scary. And sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Supreme Court has no credibility now
just an angry stupid man that feels that being a Supreme does not fill his pockets enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. The Nation got ROBBED when them GOPers sucked him into the scotus
ANITA WAS RIGHT

All he does is look at PORN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'm afraid he really IS that "irony impaired."
Uncle Clarence just ain't that bright and having a man so easily identified as an ignoramus, and a LAZY ignoramus at that, is about as "undermining" as it comes.

The sooner he's off the court the better chance that it might be restored to a body that is pledged to "protect the liberties" of the American people and not the pocketbooks of American corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
13. "High Court as an institution"? No, just the members who are corrupt.
Nobody is criticizing the Supreme Court "as an institution"...they are criticizing specific members of that institution who are corrupt and should be thrown out.

Like Clarence Thomas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
14. What a putz. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
18. Fucking A.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
19. hey clarence if you want to promote credibility in the court.....RESIGN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
21. Who's he talking to about "protecting liberties"? Corporations?
Because Clarence Thomas is the main threat to the CIVILIAN way of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
22. wish you had mentioned WHERE he was speaking
from the article:

"Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas – his impartiality under attack from liberals because of his attendance at a meeting of conservative donors sponsored by the Koch brothers and his wife’s tea party activism – struck a defiant tone in a Saturday night speech in Charlottesville, Va., telling a friendly audience that he and his wife “believe in the same things” and “are focused on defending liberty.”

Delivering the keynote speech at an annual symposium for conservative law students, Thomas spoke in vague, but ominous, terms about the direction of the country and urged his listeners to “redouble your efforts to learn about our country so that you’re in a position to defend it.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/50277.html#ixzz1FGnxh9fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. good catch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
23. Ah yaas, the SCotUS is *him*!1 Apres HIM le deluge!1 The silent deluge!1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-11 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
25. No one has undermiinded the integrity of the Supreme Court more
than Clarence Thomas. Scalia is a close second, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC