http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/bob-burnett/34900/suffer-the-little-childrenWhen I was growing up in the fifties, my parents, grandparents, and all the adults I knew lived an ethic of sacrifice. During the Great Depression and World War II they'd learned it was sometimes necessary to sacrifice for our children. This moral precept used to be shared throughout the U.S., but recently it's been lost. As a consequence, Congress now threatens to abandon America's children.
Americans cherish the notion that we are the number one nation on earth; that no matter what the metric is the U.S. comes out ahead of other countries. But that's far from the truth when the focus is on how we treat our children. A recent study rated developed nations in terms of a children's index and the U.S. came in 34th out 43 -- Sweden was number 1 and Bosnia 43; Canada was 21 and England 24. The Children's Index included infant mortality and in 2009 the U.S. had an infant mortality rate of 6.3 percent. According to the UN that placed us 33rd among 195 nations (the CIA ranked us 46th among 226 nations) -- Iceland was number 1, while England and Canada were 22 and 23. Furthermore, among industrialized nations only Mexico has a higher percentage of children living in poverty than does the US.
We're not only not number one in terms of how we treat our children, but over time our ranking has deteriorated. Why? What's happened to us?
Despite our differences on other issues, Americans once agreed on the necessity for caring for all our children. For Christians this ethic stemmed from Jesus' teaching, "And who shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me" (Matthew 18). For legalists, the admonition derived from the Parens Patriae concept in English common law, the notion that the King was ultimately the "father" of all children and, therefore, the state could intercede to protect them. Then something shifted in our collective morality.
More at the link --