shraby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-13-11 09:46 PM
Original message |
What is needed on all nuclear reactors is a manually operated |
|
cooling mechanism. Maybe the coolant stored above and a large wheel to turn and let the coolant into the reactor. Then if the power is out and the back up generators don't work, the manually operated one will. It would have solved a lot of problems right now in Japan.
|
HysteryDiagnosis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-13-11 09:47 PM
Response to Original message |
1. The runaway heat should be what forces the water in, it's called a failsafe type |
shraby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-13-11 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Mr. Shraby worked for about 20 years at nuke plants and he |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-13-11 09:53 PM by shraby
said he thought a manually operated cooling system in a case like at Japan would do the job and it shouldn't be outrageously expensive to have.
|
rzemanfl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-13-11 09:50 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I toured a nuke plant once as part of my job and I used to use |
|
hand pumps to get water at fishing resorts as a kid fifty some years ago. The pipes at a nuke plant are huge and would drain a water tower quickly.
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-13-11 09:50 PM
Response to Original message |
4. They are... it is not working very well |
|
the workers turing them have been exposed to a few RADS...
|
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-13-11 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. There's no passive safety on these designs. |
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-13-11 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. I guess NHK has been lying goodbye |
truedelphi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-13-11 09:51 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Sounds all right by me. |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-13-11 10:06 PM by truedelphi
But you still have the problem of storage, and of security, and health risk factors, and when you consider all the money that the nuke industry has pilfered from the unsuspecting public, how nice it would have been if that money had gone to solar or wind industries instead.
By tail end of the Jimmy Carter Administration over 17% of all the upscale housing in the USA was being built with solar. That fact scared the be-jesus out of the nuke and gas and coal people.
So the first thing that happened when Reagan came in, the lobbyists for those non-renewable sources hit Washington DC and overturned the tax exemptions for solar.
And now these many years later, we are still debating the F___king nuclear problem.
|
RKP5637
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-13-11 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. Reagan and Bush fucked this country up so badly we well might never recover. n/t |
Old and In the Way
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-13-11 09:52 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I wonder why the back up generators weren't mounted on the roof. |
|
Losing the generators in the flooding seems to be the root cause of this disaster...why weren't the bright minds in charge of emergency planning thinking about where to site the generators?
|
sharesunited
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-13-11 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
9. That and lead-lined underpants. |
Travis_0004
(417 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-13-11 10:33 PM
Response to Original message |
11. I think these types of reactors exist |
|
It is newer technology, so it can be done, but these are older reactors. As somebody else said, the idea of a water tower or something just wouldn't work. The worlds largest water tower holds 1.2 million gallons. With nuclear plans using up to 10-15 million gallons a day, so they would need about 10 of the largest water towers ever built, to get one day of passive cooling
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 02:09 AM
Response to Original message |