Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

George Washington's Farewell Address RE: Foreign Relations, Dangers of Permanent Foreign Alliances

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Gravel Democrat Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 11:42 AM
Original message
George Washington's Farewell Address RE: Foreign Relations, Dangers of Permanent Foreign Alliances
Happy (late) Birthday General Washington. You don't get enough respect (you don't even get a birthday these days) so here's a post for you. It's too bad you're not around these days.

When was the last time you read Washington's Farewell Address?

Summary of Address Regarding Foreign Relations, the Dangers of Permanent Foreign Alliances, and Free Trade
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington's_Farewell_Address

Washington dedicates a large part of his farewell address to discussing foreign relations, and the dangers of permanent alliances between the United States and foreign nations. This issue had taken special prominence in American politics during conflict between France and Britain, known as the French Revolutionary Wars, and the efforts of the Federalists to join sides with Britain and the efforts of the Democratic-Republicans to convince Washington to honor the 1778 Treaty of Alliance, which established the Franco-American alliance, and aid France. Washington had avoided American involvement in the conflict by issuing the Proclamation of Neutrality, which in turn led to the Neutrality Act of 1794. He clearly tries to further explain his approach to foreign policy and alliances in this portion of the address.



Once again making reference to proper behavior based upon religious doctrine and morality, Washington advocates a policy of good faith and justice towards all nations, and urges the American people to avoid long-term friendly relations or rivalries with any nation. He argues these attachments and animosity toward nations will only cloud the government's judgment in its foreign policy. Washington argues that longstanding poor relations will only lead to unnecessary wars due to a tendency to blow minor offenses out of proportion when committed by nations viewed as enemies of the United States. He continues this argument by claiming that alliances are likely to draw the United States into wars which have no justification and no benefit to the country beyond simply defending the favored nation. Washington continues his warning on alliances by claiming that they often lead to poor relations with nations who feel that they are not being treated as well as America's allies, and threaten to influence the American government into making decisions based upon the will of their allies instead of the will of the American people.

Washington makes an extended reference to the dangers of foreign nations who will seek to influence the American people and government. He makes a point to say that he believes both nations who may be considered friendly as well as nations considered enemies will try to influence the government to do their will and it will only be "real patriots" who ignore popular opinion and resist the influence of friendly nations to seek what is best for their own country. Washington had a recent experience with foreign interference, when in 1793 the French ambassador Edmond-Charles Genêt organized demonstrations in support of France, funded soldiers to attack Spanish lands, and commissioned privateers to seize British ships. His mobilization of supporters to sway American opinion in favor of an alliance with France crossed the line and he was ordered to leave.


Washington goes on to urge the American people to take advantage of their isolated position in the world, and avoid attachments and entanglements in foreign affairs, especially those of Europe, which he argues have little or nothing to do with the interests of America. He argues that it makes no sense for the American people to wage war on European soil when their isolated position and unity will allow them to remain neutral and focus on their own affairs. As a result, Washington argues that the country should avoid permanent alliance with all foreign nations, although temporary alliances during times of extreme danger may be necessary, but does say that current treaties should be honored although not extended. (Despite his claim that current alliances should be honored, Washington had in fact through the Proclamation of Neutrality not honored the Treaty of Alliance, which promised aid in case the French were ever attacked by the British.)

Washington wraps up his foreign policy stance by advocating free trade with all nations arguing that trade links should be established naturally and the role of the government should be limited to insuring stable trade, defending the rights of American merchants, and any provisions necessary to insure that the government is able to insure the conventional rules of trade.

(more at link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington's_Farewell_Address):

The Dangers of Political Parties

The Importance of the Constitution's System of Checks and Balances, Separation of Powers, and Constitutional Amendments

(link to complete original text: http://www.bartleby.com/43/24.html)




"Real Americans Question Absolutely Everything"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UncleTomsEvilBrother Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Okay
Was this speech delivered before or after his daily beatings and rapes of his slaves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. wow, you know, you're right!
NOTHING George Washington ever did or said is relevant because (according to your post) he beat and raped his slaves on a daily basis.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gravel Democrat Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. sources for beating and rape accusation please
haven't been able to come up with anything credible saying he beat and raped his slaves.

Apparently he did free them in his will, although I don't have time right now to triple check that.

Here is a question for you:

Why was bloodshed not required in England to end the despicable practice of slavery there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Rec'd for information n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC