|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 06:45 PM Original message |
NCI Cannabis Antitumor admission may be good news for cancer patients but not for recreational users |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scuba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 06:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. But it is good for your morale. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
2. ahhh... ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
3. Cost benefit analysis? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 06:58 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Sounds better than magic elixir. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 07:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. It seems to be exactly that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 09:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. If a rational observer were to think that you exaggerate the benefits and minimize the cons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 10:25 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Well...what an idiotic analogy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-25-11 11:56 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I don't need to guess, "THC receptors" also bind to other endogenous compounds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 12:54 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. whatever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 01:36 AM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Did you give up the then why is there a THC receptor argument? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Webster Green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 01:55 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Nah, I just got bored with your reefer madness bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 01:59 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. You can misrepresent my position as "reefer madness" all you want but it only indicates that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 12:10 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. When you equated alcohol to cannabis you told me everything I needed to know about your position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 01:35 AM Response to Reply #13 |
18. I wasn't comparing toxicity, I was comparing the use of rationalization |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtbymark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
4. The 'cost benefit analysis' of poking smot hahahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
7. What the hell happened to the idea of being able to do something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 09:48 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. When that feeling good becomes addictive and becomes more important than family, freedom, and health |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Mar-24-11 10:30 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Deleted message |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 12:31 AM Response to Reply #9 |
15. DSM-V will be removing the "cannabis dependence" diagnosis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 01:34 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Under that proposal, which you misrepresented, you can still Specify "With Physiological Dependence" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 01:45 AM Response to Reply #17 |
21. You could say the same about religion or Diet Coke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 01:50 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. I'll make my own points thank you but I'll have to disagree about religion causing physiological |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 11:01 AM Response to Reply #17 |
28. Again, the diagnosis "cannabis dependence" is being removed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 06:11 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. So which is it "least addictive" or not addictive at all? It can't be both. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
14. And what's the cost benefit analysis of spending $40B a year to imprison people for getting high? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 01:39 AM Response to Reply #14 |
20. It is a sham and a huge waste of money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tsiyu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 02:06 AM Response to Original message |
25. Gee, Ya Think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 02:11 AM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Research like this has been used by some recreational users to support their often inaccurate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-26-11 02:16 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. No where did I say that cannabis users are stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC