Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

*NOT* April Fools. GOP House- LESS rest for airline pilots, MORE pesticides in water sources

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 07:33 PM
Original message
*NOT* April Fools. GOP House- LESS rest for airline pilots, MORE pesticides in water sources
GOP Guts Regulation Requiring Adequate Rest For Pilots
http://thinkprogress.org/2011/04/01/gop-guts-flight-safety/

But today, the Republican House of Representatives passed an amendment sponsored by Rep. Bill Shuster (R-PA) to a Republican-drafted aviation bill that would essentially gut the planned pilot fatigue rules by requiring extensive tailoring to many different segments of the aviation industry, and exempting several others.

Hero pilot Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger blasted the amendment yesterday before it passed, saying “it creates a huge obstacle to new regulations,” and that, "at some point in the future, we don’t know when, it’s likely people will die unnecessarily.”


Anti-EPA House Votes To Let Agribusiness Dump Pesticides In Our Water
http://thinkprogress.org/2011/04/01/epa-dump-pesticides/

By a veto-proof margin, the U.S. House of Representatives voted yesterday to prohibit Clean Water Act limits on pesticide pollution of lakes, streams, and rivers.

Lobbyists for industrial agriculture polluters cheered the 292-130 vote for H.R. 872, which “will amend the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Clean Water Act to clarify Congressional intent and eliminate the requirement for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits for applications of pesticides approved for use under FIFRA.” The California agribusiness lobby Western Farmers Association praised the “practical, bipartisan example of eliminating government regulations that needlessly increase farm business costs“:

The measure would bar the Environmental Protection Agency from requiring farmers or companies to comply with the Clean Water Act when using pesticides on or near water sources. The bill’s supporters said pesticides are adequately regulated by other laws. The bill passed 292 to 130 on Thursday. The 130 negative votes came from Democrats. Fifty-seven Democrats joined 235 Republicans in supporting the bill, which has yet to see Senate action.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Words fail.
:mad:



K & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Everything that's good and decent
The GOP is against. Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Every day that passes this country gets more fucked up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. 57 Dems? Damn. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddwv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-11 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yep. Hell, they didn't just voter for it...some of them cosponsored it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC