Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FL GOP bill would end state regulations at seaports

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-11 11:46 AM
Original message
FL GOP bill would end state regulations at seaports
Florida is in the throes of hard right assault.


This group of monsters have never cared about the security of our state or country, and this is proof positive.


But, wait, we thought they HATED federal help!



Jodie Tillman reports at Tampa Bay's The Buzz:


April 1, 2011


Florida would leave seaport security up to the feds under a Tampa representative’s bill headed for the House floor.
House Bill 283 is sponsored by Rep. Dana Young, R-Tampa, and passed its last committee stop this week. A similar bill pushed by Sen. Jack Latvala, R-St. Petersburg, is working its way through the Senate.

Among other things, Young’s bill repeals statewide security standards and removes the requirement that Florida Department of Law Enforcement Enforcement conduct annual inspections and run background checks on seaport workers.

The federal government already oversees security regulations at the state's 14 seaports. The seaport industry says the state regulations are duplicative and burdensome and has pushed for the legislation.

Port workers could save hundreds of dollars since the state background check and security cards would no longer be required. FDLE, however, stands to lose nearly $522,000 in revenue.

.....




We will no longer recognize Florida when these criminals, thieves and despots finish with it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-11 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. This will work out well.....
NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CherokeeDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-11 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. This entire situation across the country is becoming bizarre...
Child labor laws reduced, port security reduced, unions destroyed, I'm getting a bit overwhelmed by the audacity of these Republicans. Worse, the elected Democrats seem not to be putting up a fight. It's the people who are fighting back...and thank goodness. I've never seen anything like this...it's unbelievable and frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-11 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I agree with completely! This is very scary and seems to be systemic!
I've had a very bad feeling for a while now..since the oil spill...
I hope more people start paying attention to what's going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howaboutme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-11 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. What happened to state's rights?
and pushing the power to the people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-11 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. That would explain the drug testing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mister Ed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-11 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Who would benefit from reduced port security besides terrorists and drug cartels? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-11 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Maybe the "legitimate" US firms tangled up with the smugglers
In the 1990's, Phillip Morris and other tobacco companies began facilitating the smuggling of their cigarettes into Colombia, because they were losing customers in the US and evading Colombian import tariffs allowed them to compete with local brands and grab off market share. They knew but didn't care that the same smuggling operation were simultaneously serving to money launder the profits from cocaine sales in the US back into Colombia.

There was a case brought against Philip Morris for this under RICO statutes in 2000, with several European countries complaining about lost tax revenues. However, it was dismissed in 2001, with Judge Sonia Sotomayor writing that "claims by foreign sovereigns invoking their tax statutes may embroil the courts in an evaluation of the foreign nation's social policies, an enquiry that can be embarrassing to that nation and damaging to the forum state."

Following that, the original version of the Patriot Act included a provision that would have let foreign countries sue American tobacco firms in US courts, but the Bush White House and the US Chamber of Commerce quietly arranged for it to be dropped.

Bill Moyers did an extensive investigative report on this in 2002, which is still available online -- links at http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/peso.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-11 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. And this is bad, how?
Our state law enforcement is a joke. They are easily influenced by political maneuvering. I would rather have a federal employee doing the job than someone who has to depend on Florida's corrupt style of good ole boy networking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lochloosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-02-11 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I agree Backlash. I have had the BG checks to get onto Jax Port.
I'm sure the FBI's was more extensive than the States. Funny, they never mentioned DU. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC