Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Polluted Air Another Danger to U.S. Troops in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 05:45 AM
Original message
Polluted Air Another Danger to U.S. Troops in Iraq
Polluted Air Another Danger to U.S. Troops in Iraq
By Serena Gordon
HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, March 31 (HealthDay News) -- While the risks of gunfire and explosive devices to U.S. soldiers stationed in Iraq are obvious, new research suggests that high levels of air pollution in that country might pose a threat to their respiratory health.

Scientists have been collecting air samples in Baghdad since 2008, and they found that the Iraqi air often contains fine particulate matter made up of many elements, including silica, sulfates and heavy metals, such as lead, arsenic, cadmium and mercury. Fine particulate matter is of greater concern than large particulate matter because these tiny particles can travel deep into the lungs, where they can cause more damage.

Some air quality readings in Iraq found that the fine particulate matter was nearly 10 times higher than the levels generally considered acceptable in the United States.

"There is concern with the amount of the fine particles in the atmosphere that the soldiers, and the Iraqi citizens, are living in," said study co-author Jennifer Bell, a doctoral student in the department of chemistry and biochemistry at the Geophysical Institute at the University of Alaska in Fairbanks.

"Fine particulate matter is very, very small. If you think about the size of a hair follicle, these particles are smaller than a hair follicle," said Bell. "The natural defenses, like the hairs in the nose, normally trap coarse particles, but these particles are so small they bypass the body's natural defenses."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Aryo Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why is Depleted Uranium never mentioned in articles like this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Depleted Uranium is Agent Orange on steroids.
We had to drag the Veterans Administration into admitting that AO was bad for you for decades. I suspect it will be more decades before they admit DU is harmful to humans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aryo Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Great point.
Have you seen any of the deformed babies born in the countries where we use DU? Really tragic and sickening that no one knows this stuff is going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not personally, but I helped put a presentation together a few years ago
***CAUTION - contains graphic pictures - CAUTION ***

http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&source=hp&biw=1280&bih=557&q=%22birth+defects%22%2Bbasra&btnG=Search+Images&gbv=2&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=

***CAUTION - contains graphic pictures - CAUTION ***
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gravel Democrat Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. ^^^
The US and NATO militaries used DU penetrator rounds in the 1991 Gulf War, the Bosnia war,<15> bombing of Serbia, and the 2003 invasion of Iraq.<16>




Annex II to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material 1980 (which became operative on 8 February 1997) classifies DU as a category II nuclear material. Storage and transport rules are set down for that category which indicates that DU is considered sufficiently "hot" and dangerous to warrant these protections. But since weapons containing DU are relatively new weapons no treaty exists yet to regulate, limit or prohibit its use. The legality or illegality of DU weapons must therefore be tested by recourse to the general rules governing the use of weapons under humanitarian and human rights law which have already been analysed in Part I of this paper, and more particularly at paragraph 35 which states that parties to Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 have an obligation to ascertain that new weapons do not violate the laws and customs of war or any other international law. As mentioned, the International Court of Justice considers this rule binding customary humanitarian law.

In 2001, Carla Del Ponte, then the chief prosecutor for the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, said that NATO's use of depleted uranium in former Yugoslavia could be investigated as a possible war crime.<43>


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depleted_uranium
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC