Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Open Letter to President Obama on the Nomination of Elizabeth Warren

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 08:12 AM
Original message
Open Letter to President Obama on the Nomination of Elizabeth Warren
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2011/04/02

by Ralph Nader

April 1, 2011

Dear President Obama:

An interesting contrast is playing out at the White House these days—between your expressed praise of General Electric’s CEO, Jeffrey R. Immelt and the silence regarding the widely desired nomination of Elizabeth Warren to head the new Consumer Financial Regulatory Bureau within the Federal Reserve.

On one hand, you promptly appointed Mr. Immelt to be the chairman of the President’s Council on Jobs and Competitive, while letting him keep his full time lucrative position as CEO of General Electric (The Corporate State Expands). At the announcement, you said that Mr. Immelt “understands what it takes for America to compete in the global economy.”

Did you mean that he understands how to avoid all federal income taxes for his company’s $14.2 billion in profits last year, while corralling a $3.2 billion benefit? Or did you mean that he understands how to get a federal bailout for GE Capital and its reckless exposure to risky debt? Or could you have meant that GE knows how to block unionization of its far flung workers here and abroad? Perhaps Mr. Immelt can share with you GE’s historical experience with lucrative campaign contributions, price-fixing, pollution and those nuclear reactors that are giving people fits in Japan and worrying millions of Americans here living or working near similar reactors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Like Nader, I also
look forward to Obamas response. I doubt there will be a response, but what the hell, one can "hope". K/R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Love him or hate him, you gotta admit, Ralph speak his mind w/o fear of repurcussions. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radiclib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. FUCK NADER!
He claimed that BUSH=GORE, causing the ensuing global financial meltdown and the massive torture, death and displacement of millions of innocents. Nothing out of his mouth has any credibility. In fact, progressives should automatically oppose anything he claims to stand for, because he's so obviously full of shit. GOBAMA! :bounce:

Do I really need this?--:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwishiwas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. OP is right--it is a stark contrast between the two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Nader
and all of his acolytes can go fuck themselves. Back to your gated home Ralphie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radiclib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Right
I'm sure Ralphie's "gated home" is protected 24/7 by armed security, like those of Obama's closest financial advisors. Unless you're a trolling billionaire, Nader is on your side, whether you like it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ralph Nader is a clown
Edited on Sun Apr-03-11 10:42 PM by ProSense
<...>

Compare, if you will, the record of Elizabeth Warren and her acutely informed knowledge about delivering justice to those innocents harmed by injustice in the financial services industry. A stand-up Law Professor at your alma mater, author of highly regarded articles and books connecting knowledge to action, the probing Chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel (COP) and now in the Treasury Department working intensively to get the CFRB underway by the statutory deadline this July with competent, people-oriented staff.

There were many good reasons why Senate leader Harry Reid (Dem. Nevada) called Professor Warren and asked her to be his choice for Chair of COP. Hailing from an Oklahoman blue collar family, Professor Warren is just the “working class hero” needed to make the new Bureau a sober, law and order enforcer, deterrer and empowerer of consumers vis-à-vis the companies whose enormous greed, recklessness and crimes tanked our economy into a deep recession. The consequences produced 8 million unemployed workers and shattered trillions of dollars in pensions and other savings along with the dreams which they embodied for American workers.

Much more than you perhaps realize, millions of people, who have heard and seen Elizabeth Warren, rejoice in her brainy, heartfelt knowledge and concern over their plight. They see her as just the kind of regulator (federal cop on the beat) for their legitimate interests in a more competitive marketplace who you should be overjoyed in nominating.

Yet there are corporate forces from Wall Street to Washington determined to derail her nomination—forces with their avaricious hooks into the Republicans on Capitol Hill and the corporatists in the Treasury and White House.

<...>


He's writing an open letter to the President to appoint Warren to head the consumer bureau, which was made possible by the President's Wall Street Reform bill that Nader repeatedly denounced? The bureau that the President appointed her to get up and running?

If he's going to grandstand he should at least get the name of the organization right, it's the Consumer Financial Regulatory Protection Bureau.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC