malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-03-11 08:27 AM
Original message |
So then were the reactors in cascade from day one |
|
Edited on Sun Apr-03-11 08:33 AM by malaise
Did the tsunami destroy the reactors. They found workers who died as a result of tsunami. They had to keep those bodies until they detoxed them.
So then is the following correct (from March 12th): "...these reactors are in cascade and we are having a cascade failure..."
Looks like we do have informed posters at DU.
change word
|
GKirk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-03-11 09:04 AM
Response to Original message |
1. It would not be correct |
|
to say that the tsunami destroyed the reactors. It damaged or destroyed important support equipment. Check out the reactor before and after pictures in this link: http://www.abc.net.au/news/events/japan-quake-2011/beforeafter.htm
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-03-11 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. It damaged or destroyed important support equipment |
|
So it didn't damage the reactors?
Nice pics.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:33 PM
Response to Original message |