Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP's "Block Grant" Proposal for Medicaid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
wysingm Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 02:14 PM
Original message
GOP's "Block Grant" Proposal for Medicaid
Source: CBO

Bad idea then, bad idea now!

The Republicans' Medicaid plan funding would be shifted into "block grants" for states. The GOP has been pushing for Medicaid "block grants" ever since the Clinton era... 1995 Congress passed but President Clinton vetoed.

Source: CBO

Block Grant Would Produce Disparate, Harmful Effects for States Over Time

Some policymakers, including House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton and House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, are considering converting Medicaid to a block grant to produce large federal budget savings. For example, a block-grant proposal that Ryan co-authored last fall would reduce federal Medicaid spending by $180 billion over the next ten years, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). All states would face substantial reductions in federal funding under such a block grant, but some states would likely be hit particularly hard — including states whose current Medicaid expenditure levels are relatively low and states whose expenditures would rise relatively quickly in future years due to demographic, economic, or other factors...


Read more: http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3422
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's already pushing people out of care. Then the grant runs out and they're left with nothing.
Edited on Sun Apr-03-11 02:20 PM by freshwest
No medical care, no assistance, nothing. In most of those cases, the results are fatal. More deaths to satisfy the phony pro-life movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
penndragon69 Donating Member (409 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. God bless those hatefilled rethuglicons.
Fascists, one and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwishiwas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Ryan is another repug from WI. He and walker are 2 peas in a pod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. I have to mark this for a later read
basically it sounds like instead of adding the cases up - usually hospitals get around $3,000 per hospital stay, the earlier out the more money they make- they want to approximate (probably low) and dole out the money to states to pay hospitals.


Have to read all the info at your great link. Will respond later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Death panels.
Edited on Sun Apr-03-11 03:18 PM by No Elephants
``Scrooge and Marley's, I believe,'' said one of the gentlemen, referring to his list. ``Have I the pleasure of addressing Mr Scrooge, or Mr Marley?''

``Mr Marley has been dead these seven years,'' Scrooge replied. ``He died seven years ago, this very night.''

``We have no doubt his liberality is well represented by his surviving partner,'' said the gentleman, presenting his credentials.

It certainly was; for they had been two kindred spirits. At the ominous word ``liberality'', Scrooge frowned, and shook his head, and handed the credentials back.

``At this festive season of the year, Mr Scrooge,'' said the gentleman, taking up a pen, ``it is more than usually desirable that we should make some slight provision for the Poor and destitute, who suffer greatly at the present time. Many thousands are in want of common necessaries; hundreds of thousands are in want of common comforts, sir.''

``Are there no prisons?'' asked Scrooge.

``Plenty of prisons,'' said the gentleman, laying down the pen again.

``And the Union workhouses?'' demanded Scrooge. ``Are they still in operation?''

``They are. Still,'' returned the gentleman, `` I wish I could say they were not.''

``The Treadmill and the Poor Law are in full vigour, then?'' said Scrooge.

``Both very busy, sir.''

``Oh! I was afraid, from what you said at first, that something had occurred to stop them in their useful course,'' said Scrooge. ``I'm very glad to hear it.''

``Under the impression that they scarcely furnish Christian cheer of mind or body to the multitude,'' returned the gentleman, ``a few of us are endeavouring to raise a fund to buy the Poor some meat and drink, and means of warmth. We choose this time, because it is a time, of all others, when Want is keenly felt, and Abundance rejoices. What shall I put you down for?''

``Nothing!'' Scrooge replied.

``You wish to be anonymous?''

``I wish to be left alone,'' said Scrooge. ``Since you ask me what I wish, gentlemen, that is my answer. I don't make merry myself at Christmas and I can't afford to make idle people merry. I help to support the establishments I have mentioned: they cost enough: and those who are badly off must go there.''

``Many can't go there; and many would rather die.''

``If they would rather die,'' said Scrooge, ``they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population. Besides -- excuse me -- I don't know that.''

``But you might know it,'' observed the gentleman.

``It's not my business,'' Scrooge returned. ``It's enough for a man to understand his own business, and not to interfere with other people's. Mine occupies me constantly. Good afternoon, gentlemen!''

Seeing clearly that it would be useless to pursue their point, the gentlemen withdrew. Scrooge resumed his labours with an improved opinion of himself, and in a more facetious temper than was usual with him.



MODS: COPYRIGHTS ON ALL DICKENS' WORKS HAVE EXPIRED. HIS WORKS ARE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Actually had a GOPer quote part of that rant shamelessly, agreeing with Scrooge. Big Xtian, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Do they KNOW who they are cutting? My partner shops for them, and I WANT to pay taxes for them.
They cannot do for themselves. My partner has shopped for years for women on Medicaid. One story: An absolutely good-hearted sweet soul in her 40s who is confined to a wheelchair in a tiny subsidized apartment who has no relatives and only survives thanks to Medicaid. She's a sweetheart who makes gifts for others (they aren't very good, but her heart is in the right place).

A disabled, poor black woman with no resources. Yes, that's the ticket: Punish her.

I pay and have paid for 40+ years for war, oil subsidies, the Koch interests and other benefits for the filthy rich. Or just the filthy.

Now the Repukes are going to cut off support for people like this nice lady, who I WANT MY TAXES TO SUPPORT.

I am sickened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Fucking bleeding heart liberal.
I so want to give you a big hug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Right back at ya.
We can use all the hugs we can get. But hug those who truly need it first; I'm doing OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-11 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Running the government like a business, she's bad for the bottom line along with a LOT of people...
That I know and care about. It's nothing less than murder, and they know it, but they've demonized these folks so much, the teapartiers support this as good for society. Certainly for themselves. And we would have been sent to prison for not paying for all those stinking wars, past, present and future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. There they go with their damn "block grants" again.
They were the answer to everything back when Clinton was President, not just for Medicaid. Same tired, old shit, different decade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wysingm Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-03-11 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Got that right
same old, same old... it's getting annoying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC