Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court rules against challenge to religious school aid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 09:08 AM
Original message
Supreme Court rules against challenge to religious school aid
"The Supreme Court of the United States ruled Monday against a challenge to tax aid to religious schools in Arizona.

In the 5 to 4 decision , the court ruled that taxpayers cannot challenge government scholarship programs that direct money to religious activities. The Supreme Court said the taxpayers who challenged the program lacked standing to bring the case.

"This misguided ruling betrays the public school system by directing tax dollars to religious schools," Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United, said. "The court, with the full support of the Obama administration, has slammed the courthouse door in the face of Americans who don’t want their tax dollars to subsidize religion."

...

"The Obama administration argued in favor of the program and the Solicitor General’s Office at the U.S. Department of Justice requested and was granted 10 minutes to argue in favor of the plan."

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/04/04/supreme-court-rules-against-challenge-to-religious-school-aid/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Lacked standing to bring the case" because it was a tax cut
Edited on Tue Apr-05-11 09:13 AM by ck4829
The 5 in the SCOTUS want to make a precedence out of this, having the people who get tax cuts become our castes above us little people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. and Obama who is supposed to appreciate Constitutional law can't seem to see the problem is beyond
me

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. And the dancing supremes ignore the Constitution, yet again so they can dance for their masters.
They should not be called judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Dupilcate subject from Yesterday, 4-4-2011
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. Political thuggery. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC