Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You will always be voting for the candidate that you dislike the least.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:16 PM
Original message
You will always be voting for the candidate that you dislike the least.
Edited on Tue Apr-05-11 08:18 PM by LoZoccolo
FDR kept people in camps because of their lineage and said that collective bargaining by public sector workers shouldn't be permitted.

Dennis Kucinich said that politics needs a left and a right wing to fly and considered Ron Paul as a vice-presidential candidate, on top of putting an element of a conspiracy theory inside proposed legislation (and retracting it in a later version of the bill - even if you say the conspiracy is real you then have to admit that he caved). Besides, he ended his presidential run to go home and save his job as a representative. If his run really did stand to change anything, then he thought those things less important than keeping his job; how does that make you feel? Why do you keep coming back to someone who slaps you in the face like that?

You could go on and on about this. If you say that you'd rather vote for someone than against their opponent, you are not saying anything meaningful. You still like one better than the other.

There is no perfect candidate and everyone knows this. When people talk about not having the perfect candidate, it's not really their purpose to promote one because they know such a candidate doesn't exist. They actually want something else. You are not going to get it by distracting all of us this way. The rest of us are trying to help people. Please do not distract us from helping other people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. People voted for reagan and not against carter
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, come on
Sometimes we get to vote for someone we really support strongly.

I agree that most of the time you are right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That is only a matter of degree.
As long as there is a better candidate, nothing really changes. There is still one better and one worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. The key to getting better candidates
Is to work in the primaries.

But of course, you are right. Nobody votes for the candidate they think is the worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. To win the primaries, you have to work on the electorate.
But that's work. The netroots think they have found a way around that, to give the elected officials the impression that there's going to be a lot of people involved in a mutiny, or just to browbeat them every day. It's easy, and it makes people think that they are doing something that will work. Mostly it just distracts the people who are willing to work from their work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Local party organization
Yes, it's a long slow process, but over time it is what changes politics.

That's not to say that forums like this don't help a lot - they make you aware of political trends and issues. They are only a supplement to traditional politics, though, not a replacement.

In the end, it is the precinct by precinct work that lays the groundwork so that we can have candidates of whom we are proud. We shouldn't ever forget that. I guess it just bothers me when I hear people making despairing comments. Okay, I'm miserable about a lot of things. But that misery should just be a signal to get out and do stuff at the local level.

I don't want people to fall into passivity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. One detail
There's no opposition party to corporatism. Kucinich was banned from nomonation debates and the other "Democrats" gave tacit aproval.

I'm done voting for Republicans, in either party.

done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Right, this is why they spend so much money trying to defeat Democrats.
I would have much more respect for someone who was able to point out specifically where Democrats need to change, rather than trying to foist hyperbole on thinking people.

Seriously, we're trying to be serious here. You owe it to us to be serious. There's no way that these people would spend their money so vigorously against Democrats if they were the same. We're tired of hearing this because there is overwhelming evidence that it's false. If you have a problem with this or that, then explain to us why you don't like this or that. Don't waste our time with tantrums and falsehoods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joentokyo Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. The money to both parties come from the same corporations. Wake up! You are owned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Why would the insurance companies spend so much trying to defeat Obama's health care plan?
Edited on Tue Apr-05-11 08:31 PM by LoZoccolo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. If I need to educate you about that
then you aren't worth the investment of my time.

I am serious. You are either drunk on TV News or in serious denial. Your post is flamebait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Why would anybody believe that you're not copping out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. or... you're sold out and pimpin' the same tired Obama BS
that was used to lie his ass into office in the first place.

Lie to yourself -fine. But can the flamebait and propaganda. Obama is a Republican in the Democratic Party. There will be no Democrat to vote for. We are disenfranchised.

And you must be new to the game son. Take a break from your own bullshit and take time to learn a thing or two about the movement we struggle for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Try to be serious and answer the question.
Person A has no explanation, but tells his opponent that if he doesn't already know, it's not worth explaining.

Person B has an explanation, but tells his opponent that if he doesn't already know, it's not worth explaining.

Person C sees both person A and person B say this.

How does person C distinguish between the person who has the explanation, and the person who doesn't?

Remember, there are a lot of people in the position of person C watching you right now! I would think you'd want to stick to the topic and answer the question!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. LOL
There are not a lot of people watching me, but thanks for playing.
Seriously. The list of Obama betrayals is almost as long as his record in office. His appointees are a roll-call of corporatists.
and YOU want to call ME out?
:rofl:
If you want to get serious, first get real and find a piece of ground in reality.

PREDICTION: You will get your Obama. You will get your corporatist Dem Party. And the country will collapse. Be filled with joy, you will get what you ask for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joentokyo Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Well, at least one person has awakened from the sleep TV promotes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Welcome to DU
:fistbump:
I sense a veteran of the struggle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Even for those who believe that Dennis Kucinich is the perfect candidate, he has a big flaw:
he couldn't be elected to a statewide office in Ohio much less the entire nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm fired up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. Not true. In 2008 I voted for a candidate I liked very much....
...oh, how I wish that man were President today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. If FDR was running today he wouldn't get any love from some DU'ers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Of course not, because it's not about making a fair evaluation.
It's about trying to get more with verbal bullying of our elected officials. This is why there's a disconnect between the general population of liberals, and the population of liberals on the Internet in terms of their (apparent) approval of Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. He wouldn't be allowed in the nomination debate, Like Kucinich
and his fellow modern "Democrats" would be silently snickering with glee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. I believe many of those you are complaining about/to are also trying to help people n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC