Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Raskin, Granholm eyed for consumer agency: source

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:41 PM
Original message
Raskin, Granholm eyed for consumer agency: source
Raskin, Granholm eyed for consumer agency: source

WASHINGTON — The White House is considering Federal Reserve Governor Sarah Raskin and former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm to head a new agency charged with protecting consumers of financial products, a source aware of the process said on Tuesday.

Raskin, who was recently named by President Barack Obama to a seat on the Fed's board, is viewed as readily able to win the needed Senate confirmation to the office, which was created by legislation that overhauled U.S. financial regulation.

Raskin, a former state regulator and former staffer on the Senate Banking Committee, is also seen by the White House as a candidate that would be acceptable to the financial services industry, the source added.

The source did not say whether other candidates in addition to Raskin and Granholm were under consideration.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35624500
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. "acceptable to the financial services industry"?!??
Why the bloody hell would that be considered a criterion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northoftheborder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Because that is the criterion for the position. Hadn't you heard?
The Banksters must be happy. They hate Elizabeth Warren, because she is fair to her clients, the consumers. She will be marginalized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. for Senate confirmation. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Appointing another political hack, why am I no longer surprised?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-05-11 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm pretty sure Granholm...
has no interest in the position. She has already said her plans for the year are set.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC