|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
AlabamaLibrul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 10:54 PM Original message |
Party Over Principle: Democrats Going All Scientology on Nader For 11 Years Now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sudopod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. True enough. There are nuttier figures out there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
white_wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think you mean Gore instead of Kerry. Other than that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlabamaLibrul (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 10:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Yes, I did. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
4. Deleted message |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
5. Nader helped make it possible for bush "win" in 2000. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Overall, his influence on the election was minor, and that grievance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. You could add |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 12:25 AM Response to Reply #12 |
22. I should also add 4. Contested blatantly stolen votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLAprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. No, Katherine Harris, Jeb Bush, and the SCOTUS did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ramulux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 12:36 AM Response to Reply #5 |
24. So you are against democracy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 12:46 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Yes, of course I am. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Lane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 02:33 AM Response to Reply #24 |
40. That's like our saying that you're against the First Amendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
6. Nader: Impeach Obama for 'war crimes' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:27 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Deleted message |
ThomCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. That wall street reform bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 12:02 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. "does not re-install Glass-Steagall, or anything equivalent." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 12:20 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. The Voker rule got watered down to almost nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 12:31 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Nonsense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 12:40 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Got even the slightest bit of evidence for that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:39 AM Response to Reply #18 |
34. Exactly -- and in fact Rahm Emmanuel "crows" to business about how much more they'll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PufPuf23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 12:01 AM Response to Reply #6 |
17. In no way am I calling for POTUS Obama to be impeached |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:40 AM Response to Reply #17 |
35. Obama/Dems have kept these wars going now two years past Bush -- why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:36 AM Response to Reply #6 |
30. The Wall Street Reform Bill is more reform that isn't -- and it's by Sen. Dodd -- !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
7. Nader was great when he was just a consumer advocate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:13 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. There was absolutely no way BushCo was going to let Gore win that election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 12:22 AM Response to Reply #10 |
21. This is very true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:43 AM Response to Reply #7 |
37. Nader has always been concerned with civil rights, human rights, issues of justice ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 09:46 AM Response to Reply #37 |
47. Yeah, he's concerned with busting unions too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:34 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. What businesses did Nader ever run that weren't public citizen organizations? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:07 PM Response to Original message |
8. Nader is for Nader. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:37 AM Response to Reply #8 |
32. Obama is for Obama -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
9. Choicepoint (DBT) stole the election, along with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-05-11 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
11. Bush stole the election - Gore won once count was final. Nader had no effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Second Stone (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
19. Nader is a fraud and always was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:45 AM Response to Reply #19 |
38. Nader has been one of our major truth tellers for decades -- and as we can see right now ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ramulux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 12:40 AM Response to Original message |
25. Democrats dont believe in democray |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:31 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. Truth hurts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
29. Democratic Party scapegoated Nader to avoid having to face questions re 2000 -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:36 AM Response to Original message |
31. Nader doesn't care about achieving progress toward principle, he just cares about pushing whats his. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:38 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. Nader cares -- that's why the Democratic Party wants to knock him out ... too many embarrassing Q's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:42 AM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:46 AM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Deleted message |
ReggieVeggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:38 PM Response to Reply #31 |
51. Calling Nader "fringe left" is like calling Obama a socialist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 02:52 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. I'm not talking specifically about him, but more about what comes out of his mouth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 02:38 AM Response to Original message |
41. How are those conflicting statements? Had Nader not run, there wouldn't have even been a recount. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 07:04 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Like they couldn't steal a paltry and mathematically insignificant number of votes to make up for it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:09 AM Response to Reply #42 |
57. The answer is simple. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReggieVeggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:40 PM Response to Reply #41 |
52. bull shit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:04 AM Response to Reply #52 |
56. Sometimes, an argument is made for 10 years because it is entirely factually true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
43. his arrogance, his taking money from repubs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ReggieVeggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:41 PM Response to Reply #43 |
54. uh, you do realize Democrats take money from Repubs, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBGLuthier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 07:09 AM Response to Original message |
44. Nader is too narrowly principled for democrats to tolerate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 07:12 AM Response to Original message |
45. Nader is an useful idiot's idiot. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 07:17 AM Response to Original message |
46. He's like the ground hog, except he only comes out to see he shadow every 4 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
49. Ralph Nader and his stupid "both parties is the same VOTE FOR MEEEEEEE" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueDemKev (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:26 AM Response to Reply #49 |
58. More like the Pacific Ocean..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
50. Please don't confuse democrats with DU's outrage of the day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-06-11 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
53. Ralph Nader is DU's very own Emmanuel Goldstein. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:39 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC