michaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-07-11 06:43 PM
Original message |
| Why would anyone, Democrat or Republican, be allowed to have total access |
|
to this kind of info? Why would anyone even want to put themselves in this position since they could be held accountable if and when a mistake was made? It makes no sense at all that this woman was allowed to do this. We are talking about a person with problems in the past. Unreal to me!
|
| arcane1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-07-11 06:45 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. I'm surprised it's even legal. And she was given IMMUNITY!!! n/t |
| GKirk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-07-11 06:49 PM
Response to Original message |
|
be kind enough to add a link to what you're talking about.
I'm guessing it has to do with the Wisconsin vote but come on
how hard is it to add a link?
|
| michaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-07-11 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. Why would you need me to put up a link to all the posts on here? For God's sake |
| dixiegrrrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-07-11 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 5. Really... I have no idea what the hell is going on. |
|
Not everyone has a tv or is home all the time.
|
| MadMaddie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-07-11 07:11 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. This breaks all IT security rules |
|
This woman has broken IT rules but potentially voting laws.
They need to investigate and they need to prosecute.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:57 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
