Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Prosser Up by 7500+ After 'Database Error' Discovered by Controversial Clerk in Republican Waukesha

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 07:21 AM
Original message
Prosser Up by 7500+ After 'Database Error' Discovered by Controversial Clerk in Republican Waukesha
BREAKING: Prosser Up by 7500+ in WI Supreme Court Race After 'Database Error' Discovered by Controversial Clerk in Republican Waukesha County
County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus, a GOP activists, previously criticized and audited for storing election results only on a personal computer in her office
UPDATED: New numbers now put state-sponsored recount just out of reach for Kloppenburg...

As word was floating around this afternoon about a possible "book keeping error" discovered during canvassing of Tuesday's incredibly close Wisconsin Supreme Court election, an error that might give thousands of votes to Justice David Prosser in a race which he trailed by just 204 votes based on unofficial Election Night numbers, we idly wondered if the county in question might turn out to be the very controversial Kathy Nickolaus' Waukesha County.

And, whaddaya know...
BREAKING: Computer Error Could Give Prosser 7,381 More Votes, Victory
April 7, 2011 5:29 P.M. By Christian Schneider

After Tuesday night's Wisconsin Supreme Court election, a computer error in heavily Republican Waukesha County failed to send election results for the entire City of Brookfield to the Associated Press. The error, revealed today, would give incumbent Supreme Court Justice David Prosser a net 7,381 votes against his challenger, attorney Joanne Kloppenburg. On Wednesday, Kloppenburg declared victory after the AP reported she finished the election with a 204-vote lead, out of nearly 1.5 million votes cast.

<snip>

As Schneider notes in the NRO piece, Waukesha's County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus had indeed come under scrutiny for her election procedures in the past. As The BRAD BLOG flagged back in August of 2010, it was discovered that Nickolaus keeps election results on her personal PC in her office, and only on her personal PC.

At a press conference moments ago, Nickolaus is said to have attributed the confusion in numbers to "save error" in Microsoft Access on her computer.

More:
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=8456

Hat-tip to: http://twitter.com/#!/bluegal/status/56146851312836608


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. It would seem to me that votes kept on a personal computer would be invalid
but hey, that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Chain of evidence has been corrupted. I would think those "votes"
would be found to be null and void.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Dammit! I just found 10,000 votes on MY computer! Who do I report this to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Something is really stinky here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. This woman worked for Prosser, too, when he was GOP Senate leader and she knew
of the error on Wed at noon, but didn't say anything until her news conference on Thursday afternoon. Yes, I'd say something is mighty fishy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwishiwas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Did she really know on Wednesday? Also someone on talk
radio today said the Prossed camp announced that Processer has not had contact with her since ??since the late 90's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. lets look at her phone records
and find out. The integrity of the vote is compromised. The "found" votes should be thrown out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. And you believed this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newportdadde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. She keeps them on her personal PC and in Access... Access..
Might as well store them on a napkin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. I just found 100,000 votes on my computer that makes Al Gore
the winner in Florida. They were accidental saved in a folder with my Face book photos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Oh, I am so glad you found these!
I always had the feeling Al probably won that election . . .

Of course, Nicklaus may have a few thousand extra votes for GWB stashed in a stray "Election 2000" folder on her desktop.

I hope we never return to paper ballots -- optical scanning of paper ballots (which can be saved and recounted, giving reproducible results) would just take all the excitement and fun out of elections in the U.S.

Frinstance, Canada has their paper ballots counted and election results posted within four hours or so. Where's the fun in that???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. 2006: WI Clerk Nickolaus Finds "Inexplicably" Misplaced Votes
2006: WI Clerk Nickolaus Finds "Inexplicably" Misplaced Votes
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x842345


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chrisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
12. Oh BS. Time to bring it to court if they try to keep these as official
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. WI Capital Times calls for Federal probe, full recount required in high court race
WI Capital Times calls for Federal probe, full recount required in high court race
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x842472


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. Oddly enough the Vice Chair of the Waukesha Democratic party doesn't
Edited on Fri Apr-08-11 09:20 AM by midnight
see anything wrong with this?


Ramona Kitzinger, the Democratic member of the county board of canvass, defended the process. She agreed with Nickolaus that the board "went over everything and made sure that all the numbers jived up, and they did."

"I'm the Democratic vice chair of Waukesha County, so I'm not going to stand here and tell you something that's not true," Kitzinger said.http://elections.wispolitics.com/2011/04/waukesha-county-clerk-apologizes-for.html

Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus’ response to audit recommendations aimed at improving election security in her office was not a hit with the County Board leaders Monday.

Nickolaus had said she would take the recommendations “into consideration” – sparking concern from members of the Executive Committee and, at one point, a scolding from County Board Chairman Jim Dwyer over what he later categorized as “smirks” during the discussion.

“This is the only audit in my 17 years where there’s no compliance before (the audit reaches) the Executive Committee,” he said at the start of Monday’s audit review.

An audit of last fall’s elections prompted Internal Audit Manager Lori Schubert to conclude that while the clerk’s system generally complies with state and federal guidelines and accuracy of election totals was not at issue, Nickolaus should improve security and backup procedures.

For example, Schubert recommended that Nickolaus stop using the same ID and password for three employees, assigning individual ones instead, as required by county policy, so that an audit trail of each employee’s work exists.Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus’ response to audit recommendations aimed at improving election security in her office was not a hit with the County Board leaders Monday.

Nickolaus had said she would take the recommendations “into consideration” – sparking concern from members of the Executive Committee and, at one point, a scolding from County Board Chairman Jim Dwyer over what he later categorized as “smirks” during the discussion.

“This is the only audit in my 17 years where there’s no compliance before (the audit reaches) the Executive Committee,” he said at the start of Monday’s audit review.

An audit of last fall’s elections prompted Internal Audit Manager Lori Schubert to conclude that while the clerk’s system generally complies with state and federal guidelines and accuracy of election totals was not at issue, Nickolaus should improve security and backup procedures.

For example, Schubert recommended that Nickolaus stop using the same ID and password for three employees, assigning individual ones instead, as required by county policy, so that an audit trail of each employee’s work exists.http://www.forwardlookout.com/2011/04/compiling-information-about-the-waukesha-county-clerk/10233
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
15. High-profile lawyers retained for possible Supreme Court recount
High-profile lawyers retained for possible Supreme Court recount
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4806218

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC