Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BIG NEWS! Rupert Murdoch's Newscorp just admitted to phone hacking!!!!!! Blood is in the water now!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:10 PM
Original message
BIG NEWS! Rupert Murdoch's Newscorp just admitted to phone hacking!!!!!! Blood is in the water now!
Edited on Fri Apr-08-11 12:22 PM by Snoutport
THIS is big news! Newscorp has come out publicly saying they had hacked phones and were setting up an account to pay off people whose lives have been damaged. Now, this might sound like they are fessing up but the fact of the matter is the blood is in the water and several new pieces of info have shown that Newscorp's top executives were in on the phone hacking. (Thank you Hugh Grant for taping that reporter!! That tape and the publicity you are bringing has forced Newscorp to admit to hacking).

BUT...I think this is a bait and switch to divert us. I think Newscorp is on the edge of totally imploding and taking a good chunk of the Murdoch controlled media papers with it.

Consider this:

They have already paid off quite a few people to keep hacking charges out of the courts. Last week the courts ordered the police to make public huge amounts of information they had been hiding. Murdoch knows that if he pays off all the new court cases he might be able to keep that information from going public. What he doesn't realize is the left is not going to settle. The government people are putting up a fight over Murdoch's hacking of their phones. Some of these rich celebrities don't need the money, and, best of all, if all 4000 people sue, it could gut the Murdoch media empire.

Murdoch just pulled his son out of England to get him the heck out of there since he is the one who wrote a lot of the checks that bought off witnesses.

The police are under investigation and can no longer protect Newscorp.

There are two tapes now of Newscorp employees admitting to hacking phones/emails and both have named top Murdoch people.

All we need now is ONE tiny little piece of evidence showing the hacking of a US phone number. Just one...and we can start looking at FOX.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. link for apology
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. What a fuckin' piece of shit
Murdoch deserves everything coming to him following this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm with you on that. I read one article that they hacked a rape victim and her friend's phones
just so they could get the scoop on how the girl got raped. Pretty low. She is one of the people I do hope gets a million pound check!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Big news elsewhere, but here ...
a paragraph here, a blurb there ... DONALD TRUMP JUST INSULTED SNOOKI AT THE BRAD PITT PREMIERE PARTY!! STACY JONES IS THERE LIVE!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. DId he make fun of her hair?
cause that would be pretty funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yet there are no investigations by the DOJ across the pond...
interesting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Scotland Yard is being investigated for covering it all up and being on Murdoch's payroll.
The officer in charge of the investigation retired and took a job as a writer for Murdoch! The police are all being investigated now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yet over here....crickets
A sane person would realize that Standard Operating Procedure is pretty much across the board--what they do there, they do here, etc...and start investigating their operations here.

I understand it isn't going to happen...and it is a damned shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. ANONYMOUS? I wish they would look into it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. they should loose all of their fcc licenses immediately
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. i dream of that!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kick them out of business
Fugging criminals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. Were they doing it in 2004?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. according to some past employees, YES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. The names of longtime RW operatives Roger Ailes and Karl Rove come to mind.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. exactly! Ailes was already telling eomployees to lie...so his ethics might be
just a bit skanky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. Rec. No doubt in my mind they were doing something similar in US
EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. This kind of activity should be considered treason.
These vile criminals are evil and they conspire to interfere with the electoral process, undermining democratic systems and causing the public to be harmed.

I think they should have to pay billions but there should be criminal investigations and charges.

They bought off Scotland Yard too? Unbelievable. How can there be any faith in these governments anymore.

Did they buy off our DOJ too? Enquiring minds would like to know.

Thanks for the post, this evil man has probably done more harm to the civilized world than anyone else in recent times.

As for his son running away? Has Interpol issued an arrest warrant yet? I mean they issued a red alert or something on Julian Assange who also has not been charged with anything, just wanted for questioning??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. Why would Fox be in trouble in the U.S.?
Even if they did engage in some legal hanky-panky, our Department of Justice isn't terribly interested in prosecuting certain people, and I should think that Rupert Murdoch and Fox would fit the template of folks who don't have to answer at the bar of federal justice.

I would dearly love to see the Attorney General and the Department of Justice investigate and prosecute corruption and misconduct, but from what I have seen, it's not up to this administration to make those decisions. The decision to prosecute is left to the political cronies of the accused, and unsurprisingly, nobody in that camp wants to see charges brought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. Crooks come to America to live and set up shop. Crooks run our Government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
32. I agree.
I don't think it would matter what Fox News did. There would be no investigations and it wouldn't even appear on the TV news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. So is the British Government investigating how potential blackmail, coercion or inside information
obtained by this phone hacking business over the years may have contributed either politically or socially to Murdoch "getting the green light" to take over this satellite pay-TV group?

I imagine Murdoch by admitting guilt will try to buy the silence of his victims in this regard via compensation, but surely there must a be criminal investigation?



http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/08/newscorp-idUSLDE7371L120110408

The scandal dates back to 2005/6, when the News of the World's royal reporter and a private detective were arrested and later jailed for snooping on the voicemail messages of royal aides.

London's Metropolitan Police launched a new inquiry last January after being severely criticised by some politicians and celebrities who suspected they too had had their voicemail intercepted.

(snip)

Murdoch's News Corp, which also owns The Sun and The Times newspapers, was given the green light by the government to take full control of British satellite pay-TV group BSkyB last month.



Thanks for the thread, Snoutport.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. There have been mentions of police saying "don't investigate or Newscorp will go after you"
that sort of thing. More is going to come out soon. Hugh Grant's taping is going to make it much more public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. Makes you wonder what FOX has on the Dems?
I know that we have speculated on DU before about Murdoch/RNC blackmailing Dems to make them cower to GOP desires.

Hugh Grant's work here adds a piquancy to that view.

To Hugh, Well done!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. it would explain a LOT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. Again: Let me know when Murdoch sits in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. would you settle for him having to sell of some papers to pay legal fees?
this won't put the big snake in jail but it will put some little snakes in jail. it is a start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. So when they admit to wrongdoing, it means we have to forgive them, right?
That's how it works?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. Courts are obsessed with the past. They should let bygones be bygones.
Edited on Fri Apr-08-11 12:48 PM by Boojatta
Of course, this applies to all crimes. That said, the past behavior of criminals in relation to their criminal activities should be a matter of genuine regret.

;)

Edited to add excerpt from the article:
The statement went on: "That said, past behaviour at the News of the World in relation to voicemail interception is a matter of genuine regret.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chaplainM Donating Member (744 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
26. At least we know that our president would NEVER give immunity to wiretapping corporations!
Hey, waitaminute...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Murdoch and Hillary are cozy friends. Imagine they work together on information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
27. wow -- more revelations to come, I'm sure
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
33. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kickysnana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
34. In the US they would give him a bailout for it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC