Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question for techies about electronic voting, relating to Wisconsin:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 07:32 PM
Original message
Question for techies about electronic voting, relating to Wisconsin:
Edited on Fri Apr-08-11 07:41 PM by Zorra
Please, be gentle, I am profoundly technically challenged:-)

Is it possible to clone, and/or distribute votes tallied on a computer?

Could a county clerk say, in Waukesha County, send some votes for the candidate she wanted to win to another county clerk's system in Marathon County? And then some to another county clerks system in Crawford County, and some to a county clerks system in Menominee County? And so on, until she had distributed a significant enough number of votes to other counties and thereby insured a win for her candidate?

Then the county clerk posts the votes for her own county a little late, and for a missing vote total for a precinct in her county the next day?

Would this be possible without the county clerks in the other counties knowing?

Or, could/would the other county clerks have to open their systems to receive the votes from Waukesha?

I was just wondering if this was a possible way to commit voter fraud.

If this is possible, a dishonest, partisan county clerk could increase the overall vote total for the candidate she wanted to win and never get caught...unless, of course, some clueless technical idiot on a political forum got real lucky and figured out what she was doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Possible, yes. Probable, no. There are easier ways to rig the results. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is an irrelevant question...
Because Wisconsin doesn't have electronic voting. It has paper ballot voting with an electronic OCR scanner. When the inevitable recount occurred, the paper ballots would be seen to not match the electronic count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No, not irrelevant. County clerk in Waukesha apparently had the votes saved on her personal
computer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not my point
It doesn't matter how devious the clerk was; the adjusted votes wouldn't survey a hand recount of the paper ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. What exactly does "adjusted votes wouldn't survey a hand recount of paper ballots" mean?
I don't understand.

How can votes survey something?

Definitions of survey:

1. To examine or look at comprehensively.
2. To inspect carefully; scrutinize: "Two women were surveying the other people on the platform" (Thomas Wolfe). See Synonyms at see1.
3. To determine the boundaries, area, or elevations of (land or structures on the earth's surface) by means of measuring angles and distances, using the techniques of geometry and trigonometry.
4. Chiefly British To inspect and determine the structural condition of (a building).
5. To conduct a statistical survey on.
6. To range one's gaze leisurely over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. sorry, meant "survive"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Anything on the computer would have to match the physical, recountable paper ballots. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No, I understand this about Nickolaus' computer.
None of these responses so far even remotely answers my original question except for the first response.

Apparently I either did not word the OP clearly enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC