Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If we're serious about cutting spending why are we spending millions dredging the Oregon Inlet?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 07:51 AM
Original message
If we're serious about cutting spending why are we spending millions dredging the Oregon Inlet?
Seriously, why isn't that "on the table?"

Do the people of Wanchese have that much pull?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. There's a simple answer....
BECAUSE WE'RE NOT SERIOUS ABOUT CUTTING SPENDING!!!

It's that simple. This is a dog and pony show and "spending" is short hand for "gutting and cutting things that poor people and (at least in theory) Democrats care about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I guess there aren't many poor people in Rodanthe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indydem Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Is $10 million that much to pay to keep an important waterway open?
"According to a 2006 study by Dare County, the boating and fishing industries generate more than $682 million a year in revenues and support close to 10,000 jobs."

Progressives don't let infrastructure points fill with sand and kill jobs. Only repukes do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. This is corporate welfare
From your own figures: "the boating and fishing industries generate more than $682 million a year in revenues". Are you saying that out of $682 million they can't spend $10 million of that to keep themselves going? This is greed and nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GKirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. Do you feel that the dredging
is a bad idea?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GKirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. So your oringinal post has no concern about the budget
but just your opposition to the dredging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I'm opposed to dredging because it isn't cost effective
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. Are 10,000 jobs reason enough?
An extended closure of Oregon Inlet could seriously affect the Outer Banks’ fishing and boating industries, estimated in a 2006 Dare County report to annually produce more than $682 million and support 9,851 jobs. The inlet is the only route to the Atlantic Ocean between Hampton Roads and Hatteras Inlet.


http://www.dredgingtoday.com/2011/03/14/usa-coast-guard-to-close-oregon-inlet/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. If it's an estimate, how did they come up with the number 9,851?
Seriously, what an odd number.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Do you question that many jobs are impacted by closing the inlet? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Based on what?
do you disagree that the charter fishing industry is a huge money maker in that region?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I question it because I haven't seen anything to give me reason not to question it
A link from Dredgingtoday isn't exactly objective.

Charter fishermen could use Hatteras Inlet just as easily as Oregon Inlet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. I crack up when I see a convoy of tractors, bushhogs, trucks and a myriad
of workers waging war on grass in the median of not so travelled roads that is perhaps 8 inches in height. It's a war on chlorophyll, the same chlorophyll that helps remove Co2 from the air, the same machines that are belching it out are taking down the grasses that help remove it. We are smart, are we not? Not to mention the cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
16. No, developers do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC