Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What did we get for $39 Billion dollars?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 09:15 AM
Original message
What did we get for $39 Billion dollars?
Zippo. Nada. Zero. Bupkis.


Out-fucking-maneuvered yet again.

Cut the god-damned defense budget, then you'll see progress on the deficit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obama got a photo op! Four more years!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. JUST ONE RONALD RAY-GUN CAN DESTROY AMERICA
Edited on Sat Apr-09-11 10:36 AM by HowHasItComeToThis
IT ALL STARTED WITH THAT SOB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. 1.02% reduction in spending for the next ~6 months

and an increase in human suffering, we can't forget that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Republicans gave up their insistence on a Unicorn Tax.
"You shall not crucify this nation upon a cross of Unicorn Taxes!" Harry Reid thundered, and there was napalm in his eyes when he said it. The Republicans got up to reply but then one by one they thought better of it and sat back down. Oh yes, our lads stood their ground and made the other side blink. And no one will have to pay Unicorn Taxes next year!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. But Planned Parenthood was saved.
What do you call that in negotiations?

When you put something out and pretend that it is terribly important to you, then let the other side follow you down that rabbit hole.

Meanwhile you more quietly increase the demands for what you really want -- then in the end give-up on the "important" item and call the whole deal a "compromise"?

I'm sure there is an actual term for this ploy.

And, that is what the Planned Parenthood controversy really was.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Planned Parenthood isn't important?
I wouldn't give the pubs the edge on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. It's a red herring. It is an issue that the GOP picked up to pull the conversation
Into their direction. They didn't really care about that. But they demanded it so that our compromise would move closer to their end under the illusion that they actually wanted it. In the end they got almost everything they wanted and it makes it look like we "won" because we "saved" so much they didn't really want. That's what the person above is saying I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I disagree. It was used to promote the rightwing abortion stance.
PP was very much worth the save.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. They aren't saying that it wasn't worth saving but that the GOP wasn't actually thinking they'd get
It.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I disagree.
I'll leave it at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. It is not a ploy
A poly is something that they would not do but pretend to do for effect. If they could have gotten the votes they would have cut PP off. I assure you this will be back along with alot more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. It is a ploy.
Abortion as a social issue has been a ploy of the Repuglicans since Reagan.
They use it to keep their right-wing religious base pumped-up and inflamed.

Why would they ever give that up by actually doing something decisive on that issue?

Meanwhile, thousands of federal employees are going to lose their jobs, and aid from programs to help people is going to go away because of these cuts.

"Saving Planned Parenthood" is the 'face saving' issue for the Democrats ... but the teabaggers got 80 percent of what they wanted in cuts, more than they ever should have reasonably expected.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. You are applying YOUR view of planned parent-hood to them.
If you were to read the right wing blogs, you'll find that they are very pissed that planned parenthood survived. They see it as critical.

And to suggest that the GOP isn't attacking abortion rights in a "decisive" way, you are wrong. Their entire strategy is to dismantle it piece by piece. That's why you have many states, thanks to newly elected tea bag jerks, passing restrictions on abortion. Its wht the GOP attacked abortion during the health care debate, and its why they attacked PP now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SusanaMontana41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. Glad they're pissed, but
taking food out of the mouths of my unemployed niece and her children does not a victory make. The War on Women won last night, Planned Parenthood or no Planned Parenthood.

You don't negotiate with hijackers.

Obama apparently is afflicted with the disease to please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. You're failing to distinguish those whose strings are being pulled from those doing the pulling.
Yes, many rightwing voters care about it. That's why they are vulnerable to the ploy. The wealthy corporatists don't really care about it, they merely use it as a string to pull to get ordinary rightwingers to be rightwingers and vote against their own interests on everything else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. repub "demands" were just throwaways they were willing to dump to get their slashes in budget nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
13. "We" should have thought of that before giving the Republicans a license to cut in election 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. Here ya go...
The full list of policy riders in HR1 includes: (from http://www.ombwatch.org/files/budget/OMB_Watch-HR1_Poli ... ):

Policy Riders in H.R. 1

Sec. 1284 - Prohibits funding for fresh fruits and vegetables in the school lunch program. under section 19 of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act.

Sec. 4013 - Prohibits funds to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., or any of its affiliates.

Sec. 1112 - Prohibits transferring detainees from Guantanamo Bay.
Sec. 2237 - Prohibits HUD funding for rental assistance to the elderly.
Sec. 4006 - Blocks the FCC from implementing Net Neutrality.

Sec. 1802 - Prohibits funding new Job Corp centers.
Sec. 4017 - Strips funding for any provision of the health care reform law.
Sec. 4030 - Prohibits BATF from collecting information on multiple rifle/shotgun sales to the same person.

Sec. 1590 - Prohibits DC from using its own, non-federal funds, for abortion services.
Sec. 4046 - Prohibits finding for a govt-sponsored consumer product complaints database
Sec. 1746 - Prohibits funding for EPA efforts to regulate greenhouse gases

Sec. 4027 - Prohibits funds to carry out medical loss ratio restrictions in the health care reform law. (These provisions require insurers to spend at least a certain percent of their premium revenues on medical care.)

Sec. 4009 - Prohibits funds to pay the salaries and expenses of the following Presidential czars: Obama Care Czar, Climate Change Czar, Global Warming Czar, Green Jobs Czar, Car Czar, Guantanamo Bay Closure Czar, Pay Czar and Fairness Doctrine Czar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egalitariat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. We're winning. $39 Billion is chump change. We've grown the budget substantially since 2009.
Giving back a few billion dollars now, after adding 20x that or more in the last couple of years, shouldn't be seen as a loss.

It's like fretting over adding a couple of pounds at Thanksgiving after you've spent the last 12 months losing 50.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. We? You must be a military contractor n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC