Has Ms. Nickolaus' "Human error" ever benefitted a Democrat?

[Hailtothechimp]

If yes, please point me in that direction so I can see for myself.

If no, I think we can call this one voter fraud.

[socialist_n_TN]

1. Not just her "human error"...........

There have been NO electoral "human errors" that have benefitted Dems to my knowledge. ANYWHERE.

[Tippy]

3. Got that right.....

[BzaDem]

5. That's actually not true at all. In Al Franken's election, the tally on the night of the election

was that Coleman was up by somewhat close to a thousand votes. Then, over the next few days, various canvassing errors were fixed, and the total was reduced to fewer than 300 (if I remember correctly). That switch was what allowed Franken to win after the recount, which in turned allowed HCR and Financial Reform and the Stimulus to pass.

So the correction of human error has sometimes benefited Democrats tremendously.

[Abq_Sarah]

2. how is it fraud

If the results weren't certified? What's her name left a city off the preliminary vote totals transmitted to the state. It was caught so those people aren't going to be disenfranchised. Unfortunately, that particular city went for the repub but it easily could have been a different area with a different total.

[Hailtothechimp]

4. The fact that she worked for this man in the past doesn't trouble you?

It surely troubles me.

She has a history of electoral hijinks, and they always seem to turn out the republican's way. You'd think the law of averages would also favor the dems on occasion. But it doesn't seem to work like that, does it?