Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If I were President

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 11:51 AM
Original message
If I were President



Here is how I would fix this:

Bring home military from 3 wars.
Treat all income, including capital gains, as earned income.
Close offshore tax shelters.
Raise tax rates on the wealthiest 5% to pre-Reagan era rates.
Cut military budget by 50%.


Take all of this savings and:

Invest in repair and rebuild projects for America's infrastructure and environment.
Develop and apply clean energy sources like roof top solar, hydrogen, etc...via decentralized energy distribution solutions rather than centralized corporate slavery..
Implement a universal public health system.
Apply strict hiring laws so that this is all done with union scale and benefits which helps American citizen labor first.


---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. That would do it! I would write you in!
BTW - the DOE has already decided that wind is cheaper than nuclear, and the same as coal:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. this sounds great, but I'm afraid you'd have to be dictator or king,
rather than President.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It has been said that the best form of government is a ...
benevolent dictator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Dictators are only benevolent to those who agree with them
Edited on Sun Apr-10-11 02:33 PM by MineralMan
If you do not agree, you will be a subject of dictates.

Can you name a benevolent dictator from any large country? I'll wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. O.K. I'll give it a shot ...

Singapore Leads the Good Life Under a Benevolent Dictator

Singapore has achieved the American dream, but not in the American way. It is a prosperous, clean city, with imposing skyscrapers and glittering shopping centers. The multinational corporations of the world are welcome here; you can buy any brand name you've ever heard of. The highways are lined with tropical flowers and crowded with BMWs. And at the head of this thriving free-market state is a clever, socialist dictator.

Just forty years ago Singapore was a war-battered British port on an island off the southern tip of Malaysia. It had a rapidly growing, poor, uneducated population living mostly in slums and houseboats. Singapore struggled along until 1965, when it became an independent nation with Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew in firm control.

In the next twenty years Singapore's economy grew eightfold. Average income per capita rose more than fourfold. The percentage of families living in poverty dropped to 0.3% (in the U.S. it is near 20%). Singaporeans' average life expectancy is now 71 years. No one is homeless. Population has stabilized. Virtually everyone has a job. The place runs like a Swiss watch.

Lee Kuan Yew would appreciate that analogy. Switzerland is his model. Singapore Airlines aims to outdo Swissair. Singapore likes to list its statistics alongside Switzerland's (its divorce rate is one-third that of Switzerland, its per capita calorie supply is equal, its movie attendance rate is six times higher). Lee's chief economic goal is to reach the per capita GNP of Switzerland, which will happen in one more economic doubling -- about 10 years, if past growth rates continue.
http://www.sustainer.org/dhm_archive/index.php?display_article=vn210singaporeed



Lee Kuan Yew

Lee Kuan Yew, GCMG, CH (English name: Harry, Chinese: 李光耀; pinyin: Lǐ Guāngyào; POJ: Lí Kong-iāu; born 16 September 1923; also Lee Kwan-Yew) is a Singaporean statesman.<2><3><4><5> He was the first Prime Minister of the Republic of Singapore, governing for three decades. By the time he chose to step down to enable a stable leadership renewal, he had become the world's longest-serving Prime Minister.<6>

As the co-founder and first secretary-general of the People's Action Party (PAP), he led the party to eight victories from 1959 to 1990, and oversaw the separation of Singapore from Malaysia in 1965 and its subsequent transformation from a relatively underdeveloped colonial outpost with no natural resources into a "First World" Asian Tiger. He has remained one of the most influential political figures in South-East Asia.<7>

***snip***

Legacy

During the three decades in which Lee held office, Singapore grew from being a developing country to one of the most developed nations in Asia, despite its small population, limited land space and lack of natural resources. Lee has often stated that Singapore's only natural resources are its people and their strong work ethic. He is widely respected by many Singaporeans, particularly the older generation, who remember his inspiring leadership during independence and the separation from Malaysia.

On the other hand, many Singaporeans have criticized Lee as being authoritarian and intolerant of dissent, citing his numerous mostly successful attempts to sue political opponents and newspapers who express an unfavorable opinion. International media watchdog Reporters Without Borders has asked Lee, and other senior Singaporean officials, to stop taking libel actions against journalists <29>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Kuan_Yew#Legacy


Of course, you could argue that since Singapore has a population of only 5.1 million, it doesn't qualify as a large country. However it is one of the four Asain tigers.


The Four Asian Tigers or Asian Dragons are the highly developed economies of Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan (Republic of China) . These regions were the first newly industrialized countries, noted for maintaining exceptionally high growth rates and rapid industrialization between the early 1960s and 1990s. In the 21st century, all four regions have since graduated into advanced economies and high-income economies. However, attention has increasingly shifted to other Asian economies which are now experiencing faster economic transformation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Asian_Tigers




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Singapore? Have you checked their civil rights history?
Look, I said that dictators were fine if you follow their dictates. If you don't, odds are you'll suffer some pretty harsh punishments. How does that sound to you? Try chewing gum in Singapore, for example.

And, no, it is not a large country. We have more people in single cities here in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Dictators are dictators and at the best they have faults ...
No, Lee Kuan Yew wasn't a wonderful fellow but he did lead his country in a good direction. Obviously many people disagree with his tactics, but plenty of people in the United States have disagreed with the leadership of our Presidents of both parties.

Would I want to live in Singapore? Hell no. I prefer our type of government with all its faults. In order to survive, a dictator has to be somewhat of a bad ass. Fortunately we currently limit the "rule" of our Presidents to eight years. Imagine if Bush the Junior had been able to rule our nation for three decades, or for that matter even Bill Clinton. Over time power tends to corrupt a leader which is why it is difficult to find any examples of a dictator who has been considered to the benevolent. Many Americans considered Franklin D. Roosevelt a dictator when he was President and he may be the closest our country ever came to having one. Yet I believe that he was one of our greatest Presidents if not the greatest.


Criticism of Franklin D. Roosevelt

Both during and after his terms, and continuing today, there has been much criticism of Franklin D. Roosevelt. Critics have questioned not only his policies and positions, but also the general consolidation of power that occurred due to his responses to the crises of the Depression and World War II. Also controversial was the unprecedented length of his tenure as President.

By the middle of his second term, much criticism of Roosevelt centered on fears that he was heading toward a dictatorship, by attempting to seize control of the Supreme Court in the Court-packing incident of 1937, attempting to eliminate dissent within the Democratic party in the South during the 1938 elections, and by breaking the tradition established by George Washington of not seeking a third term when he again ran for re-election in 1940. As two historians explain, "In 1940, with the two-term issue as a weapon, anti-New Dealers... argued that the time had come to disarm the "dictator" and to dismantle the machinery."<1> These criticisms largely ended after the Attack on Pearl Harbor.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Franklin_D._Roosevelt


If you look back at the posts I made, I stated, "It has been said that the best form of government is a benevolent dictator." I didn't say that I believed it. Some people have said the original person who said this was Plato, but I was unable to come up with a solid source for this comment.

I accepted your challenge for kicks and grins. It was fun to practice my Google-fu and actually proved to be educational.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's good to be the king.
However, one needs must bear the Legislative Branch in mind.

I just wish we had a president who would at least propose those things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds like a good plan to me
I might tweak a thing or two, but I am in overall agreement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GReedDiamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. President SHRED...
...I like the sound of that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Keith Bee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. You could do #1
The res you'd need Congressional approval for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Re-regulation -especially TV NEWS!
Edited on Sun Apr-10-11 12:57 PM by upi402
Trade laws have been made via corruption - re-work trade law too.

Sustainable energy (and power grid) is critical - from jobs to our lone planet with life.

k/r Love the "If I were king of the forest" threads!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. And how would you do all those things in a constitutional
republic which defines your powers? Answer me that, SHRED.

Every action requires a method. What would your methods be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. GEt thee to the next political caucus and get that written into your party's platform
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Ah, but that's too much trouble for many people. It's easier to
sit at a keyboard and muse about things. Good suggestion, though. Of course, I'm saying that as a DFL precinct chair, so I'm sorta biased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'd declare holy war...
on the Pusherman.
I'd shoot him if he run
I'd cut him if he stand..
I'd cut him with my Bible, my razor, and my gun...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. What are you gonna do about gas prices?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. How are you gonna get universal healthcare through congress?
We barely got "insurance reform" and couldn't get even a public option.
Not because of republicans, but because of democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC